Page 4 of 4
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 15 Nov 2017, 16:24
by Taansend
craigjenkins05 wrote: ↑09 Nov 2017, 18:13
jamamb wrote: ↑09 Nov 2017, 18:11
i read josh made about 10m pounds for takam. so about 10x what wilder and parker make
Yeah so sure he won't be earning 15m minimum every fight it was a mandatory with IBF so he was guaranteed 75% plus at Wembley so a lot more revenues can't see him getting 15m£ for every fight
I read that he got 15m for each of his last 2 fights.
Klitschko also got 15m. Pulev was due to get 5m.
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 27 Dec 2017, 21:54
by Taansend
It sounds like they've agreed around 67/33 split. Fight be announced soon hopefully.
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 27 Dec 2017, 22:02
by KiwiRider
Taansend wrote: ↑27 Dec 2017, 21:54
It sounds like they've agreed around 67/33 split. Fight be announced soon hopefully.
Yeah, that was on our local news. Good stuff. The best thing is, that it sets a precedent in regards to Wilder. He ain't worth 50/50 but he is worth a bit more than Parker. Because when AJ does go to try an make a deal with Detonay (I'm all about unification) Wilder, AJ will have 3/4 belts
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 27 Dec 2017, 23:44
by Taansend
KiwiRider wrote: ↑27 Dec 2017, 22:02
Taansend wrote: ↑27 Dec 2017, 21:54
It sounds like they've agreed around 67/33 split. Fight be announced soon hopefully.
Yeah, that was on our local news. Good stuff. The best thing is, that it sets a precedent in regards to Wilder. He ain't worth 50/50 but he is worth a bit more than Parker. Because when AJ does go to try an make a deal with Detonay (I'm all about unification) Wilder, AJ will have 3/4 belts
I think Parker will be a tougher fight than many realise. They shouldn't worrying about Wilder just yet.
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 28 Dec 2017, 04:05
by lillywhite14
Taansend wrote: ↑27 Dec 2017, 23:44
KiwiRider wrote: ↑27 Dec 2017, 22:02
Taansend wrote: ↑27 Dec 2017, 21:54
It sounds like they've agreed around 67/33 split. Fight be announced soon hopefully.
Yeah, that was on our local news. Good stuff. The best thing is, that it sets a precedent in regards to Wilder. He ain't worth 50/50 but he is worth a bit more than Parker. Because when AJ does go to try an make a deal with Detonay (I'm all about unification) Wilder, AJ will have 3/4 belts
I think Parker will be a tougher fight than many realise. They shouldn't worrying about Wilder just yet.
It’ll be interesting.
I think he turns Parker upside down personally. Wilder carries more of a threat but might end up being the easier fight of the two.
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 28 Dec 2017, 06:07
by Ruthless-RKO
Higgins said in a rematch, Parker could get 55% or 50% ..
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 28 Dec 2017, 10:17
by Taansend
lillywhite14 wrote: ↑28 Dec 2017, 04:05
Taansend wrote: ↑27 Dec 2017, 23:44
KiwiRider wrote: ↑27 Dec 2017, 22:02
Yeah, that was on our local news. Good stuff. The best thing is, that it sets a precedent in regards to Wilder. He ain't worth 50/50 but he is worth a bit more than Parker. Because when AJ does go to try an make a deal with Detonay (I'm all about unification) Wilder, AJ will have 3/4 belts
I think Parker will be a tougher fight than many realise. They shouldn't worrying about Wilder just yet.
It’ll be interesting.
I think he turns Parker upside down personally. Wilder carries more of a threat but might end up being the easier fight of the two.
I get what you're saying.
Parker does the fundamentals well. Has a decent chin. Wilder often looks shite but has crazy power and unorthodox style
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 28 Dec 2017, 11:02
by josco
3 titles on line (not counting g IBO) - therfore two thirds AJ, one third JP.
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 28 Dec 2017, 11:41
by Taansend
josco wrote: ↑28 Dec 2017, 11:02
3 titles on line (not counting g IBO) - therfore two thirds AJ, one third JP.
Not that simple, mate.
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 28 Dec 2017, 12:21
by Nightmare Roy
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑28 Dec 2017, 06:07
Higgins said in a rematch, Parker could get 55% or 50% ..
Ain't gonna be no rematch!
Re: Parkers Cut
Posted: 28 Dec 2017, 15:25
by josco
Taansend wrote: ↑28 Dec 2017, 11:41
josco wrote: ↑28 Dec 2017, 11:02
3 titles on line (not counting g IBO) - therfore two thirds AJ, one third JP.
Not that simple, mate.
You are right of course - the percentage that Eddie screws JP down to should perhaps be incorporated into the return clause (I know ; what return clause??) as in JP's favour should he win. Don't suppose Eddie would even risk that. though. Looking forward to the fight though, should it happen.