Its the correct decision. Fury now needs to get back in the ring and get fighting again. I cannot see Fury ever holding that title again by becoming the undisputed champ again, its not going to happen imo. But will be interesting once he steps back in the ring.
Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
-
wesshaw1985
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
It should only go to a unified champ. Until someone wins them all, it should remain vacant. Wilder has the most legit title win and that was Stiverne! The other two are ridiculous.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Wlad never won them all.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:06 It should only go to a unified champ. Until someone wins them all, it should remain vacant. Wilder has the most legit title win and that was Stiverne! The other two are ridiculous.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Ok, I'll accept AJ, Parker, Wilder sorting it out. Forget Charr. Mike Tyson never won them all.dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:10Wlad never won them all.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:06 It should only go to a unified champ. Until someone wins them all, it should remain vacant. Wilder has the most legit title win and that was Stiverne! The other two are ridiculous.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
A bit of a difference between not fighting Charr and not fighting the long reigning WBC champion, with actually a fair claim to being considered the #1 in the division for quite a large period. Yet no one seem to have had a problem with Wlad being Ring Champ.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:19Ok, I'll accept AJ, Parker, Wilder sorting it out. Forget Charr. Mike Tyson never won them all.dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:10Wlad never won them all.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:06 It should only go to a unified champ. Until someone wins them all, it should remain vacant. Wilder has the most legit title win and that was Stiverne! The other two are ridiculous.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Nice try. First WBO heavy champ was Damiani in 1989, Tyson was WBA, WBC and IBF champ from two years earlier. He had all belts in existencemickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:19Ok, I'll accept AJ, Parker, Wilder sorting it out. Forget Charr. Mike Tyson never won them all.dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:10Wlad never won them all.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:06 It should only go to a unified champ. Until someone wins them all, it should remain vacant. Wilder has the most legit title win and that was Stiverne! The other two are ridiculous.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
So Mike wasn't undisputed when he boxed Spinks or Douglas? He had about a year as champ?tobyh5 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:53Nice try. First WBO heavy champ was Damiani in 1989, Tyson was WBA, WBC and IBF champ from two years earlier. He had all belts in existencemickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:19Ok, I'll accept AJ, Parker, Wilder sorting it out. Forget Charr. Mike Tyson never won them all.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Spinks was in 1988.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 07:07So Mike wasn't undisputed when he boxed Spinks or Douglas? He had about a year as champ?tobyh5 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:53Nice try. First WBO heavy champ was Damiani in 1989, Tyson was WBA, WBC and IBF champ from two years earlier. He had all belts in existencemickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:19
Ok, I'll accept AJ, Parker, Wilder sorting it out. Forget Charr. Mike Tyson never won them all.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
So he had it a year until Damiani came along?
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
No, clearly the WBO being brand new at the time with some fat Italian as their title holder was not considered a real champion at the time. It was dismissed.
What is your point mickey? You were wrong and a "fair enough, I was mistaken" would normally suffice
What is your point mickey? You were wrong and a "fair enough, I was mistaken" would normally suffice
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
I don't see how a title won from Charles Martin, stolen from its owner, is more valid than Damianis.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
I did not mention that nor AJ nor give a shite mate, I am just talking about Tyson (the Mike variety) and your statement that Tyson never had all the belts when he actually did, lock stock the lot.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 09:42I don't see how a title won from Charles Martin, stolen from its owner, is more valid than Damianis.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
He did, briefly.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16773
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
AJ is ranked number 1 in the world by everyone except you. He's the man, you're going to have to live with it.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 09:42I don't see how a title won from Charles Martin, stolen from its owner, is more valid than Damianis.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Mickey will be like one of those Japanese soldiers on desert islands in the 70's refusing to accept the war was over .
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Seriously, I think Parker and Wilders title wins were better.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 10:16AJ is ranked number 1 in the world by everyone except you. He's the man, you're going to have to live with it.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 09:42I don't see how a title won from Charles Martin, stolen from its owner, is more valid than Damianis.
-
wesshaw1985
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
-
wesshaw1985
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Out for that long and your comeback is a freak show v a shot pensioner. 
-
wesshaw1985
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Maybe
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
And he will still get 10m for AJ after!
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Tyson did. The WBO meant nothing at all back in his prime days. Infact, the WBO heavyweight title didn’t even exist when Tyson was undisputed champ.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:19Ok, I'll accept AJ, Parker, Wilder sorting it out. Forget Charr. Mike Tyson never won them all.dirk2686 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:10Wlad never won them all.mickey1975 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 06:06 It should only go to a unified champ. Until someone wins them all, it should remain vacant. Wilder has the most legit title win and that was Stiverne! The other two are ridiculous.
It didn’t gain equal standing with the other three until mid 00’s
Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - April 2018
Is Fury going to sort out his voice - I don't think his video do him any justice with the casual fans cos he still sounds ill (or living a hard life).... I guess him singing after the fight will be a thing of the past.