Page 4 of 4
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 15:52
by oogiebe
tiny_acres wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 15:51
GGG has faced his 3 best fighters in his last 3 fights. He deserves an easy touch in this short negotiation period.
Brook, Jacobs and Canelo were all big tough fights.
I'm not going to be pissed if he fights Joe Schmo in this fight
Absolutely not. Unless I purchased the fight and haven't gotten a refund! lol!
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 15:59
by Shirow
Double post
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 16:02
by Shirow
I understood from an interview that I heard with Tom that Derevyanchenko is still an option but with so little money being available due to this no longer being PPV that he was reluctant to go ahead with it as they would be so much more cash in a properly promoted event.
Derevyanchenko is totally unknown to all but the hardcore and having DiBella as a promoter won't change that so when the threat of belt removal thrown in I hope he just goes ahead and makes the best of a bad situation of Canelo's creation and accepts short money in exchange for an exciting bout and to keep the belt.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 16:03
by apollo creed
Golovkin vs Salka fight needs to happen.

Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 16:05
by oogiebe
apollo creed wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:03
Golovkin vs Salka fight needs to happen.
LOL! or my 9y/o daughter.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 17:22
by boxing_rocks
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:05
apollo creed wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:03
Golovkin vs Salka fight needs to happen.
LOL! or my 9y/o daughter.
Nice to see two idiots agreeing with each other. Boxrec should get you participation trophies.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 17:22
by SenorPipino
apollo creed wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:03
Golovkin vs Salka fight needs to happen.
Will Golovkin be offended if Salka wears his patented "Build the Wall" trunks??
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 18:43
by oogiebe
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 17:22
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:05
apollo creed wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:03
Golovkin vs Salka fight needs to happen.
LOL! or my 9y/o daughter.
Nice to see two idiots agreeing with each other. Boxrec should get you participation trophies.
Thanks for the knock. After all, I must have insulted you what? like never? WTF is wrong with you? Mommy take away your chew toy? Come back at me and we can get it on now, you f'n cockroach.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 19:57
by SenorPipino
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:43
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 17:22
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:05
LOL! or my 9y/o daughter.
Nice to see two idiots agreeing with each other. Boxrec should get you participation trophies.
Thanks for the knock. After all, I must have insulted you what? like never? WTF is wrong with you? Mommy take away your chew toy? Come back at me and we can get it on now, you f'n cockroach.
This should be interesting.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 15 Apr 2018, 20:29
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 19:57
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:43
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 17:22
Nice to see two idiots agreeing with each other. Boxrec should get you participation trophies.
Thanks for the knock. After all, I must have insulted you what? like never? WTF is wrong with you? Mommy take away your chew toy? Come back at me and we can get it on now, you f'n cockroach.
This should be interesting.
Senor - I usually don't get myself upset like that. But, today brought out all the trolls on the internet.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 16 Apr 2018, 01:46
by apollo creed
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:43
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 17:22
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:05
LOL! or my 9y/o daughter.
Nice to see two idiots agreeing with each other. Boxrec should get you participation trophies.
Thanks for the knock. After all, I must have insulted you what? like never? WTF is wrong with you? Mommy take away your chew toy? Come back at me and we can get it on now, you f'n cockroach.
boxing_cocks is just an angry troll.

Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 16 Apr 2018, 01:50
by apollo creed
SenorPipino wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 17:22
apollo creed wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:03
Golovkin vs Salka fight needs to happen.
Will Golovkin be offended if Salka wears his patented "Build the Wall" trunks??
Golovkin : " this is serious situation .... this is street fight..... thanks to my promotions... thanks my coach Abel Sanchez"
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 16 Apr 2018, 02:15
by Deleted_Scenes
SenorPipino wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 14:44
Deleted_Scenes wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 07:42
jamamb wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 07:06
its gonna be low, they have very little to go around,
Exactly. HBO are offering peanuts, whoever the opponent is.
Unless they want to make a guaranteed loss, the fight has to be against someone who's willing to fight for almost nothing.
Nobody with any sense is going to put on an event where they're guaranteed to make a loss...
What's peanuts for Spike?
$200,000 -$250,000?
That's terrific money for a guy who has no name, no title.
Desensitized fans have become so accustomed to Mayweather/Pacquiao paydays, that they blithely dismiss a few hundred thousand dollars as "peanuts."
Most fighters will never come anywhere close to making that much for a fight.
But I do understand that if Spike has been promised an even more lucrative Canelo fight within the next year by GB, why he would suddenly bolt.
If it's true HBO were only offering $1m for the entire card (Golovkin, Spike, plus probably 4 undercard fighters), there's no chance in hell Spike would have been offered $200k.
A PPV event, even doing as low as 150k buys, brings in more than 10x that amount.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 16 Apr 2018, 02:25
by Ilya Muromets
i made a post on this thread and it disappeared.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 16 Apr 2018, 09:22
by SenorPipino
x2x wrote: ↑16 Apr 2018, 02:25
i made a post on this thread and it disappeared.
Maybe the mods are trying to tell you something.
Re: I think Golovkin is really on a decline way because they still looking for that soft opponent for him
Posted: 16 Apr 2018, 10:27
by boxing_rocks
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 20:29
SenorPipino wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 19:57
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:43
Thanks for the knock. After all, I must have insulted you what? like never? WTF is wrong with you? Mommy take away your chew toy? Come back at me and we can get it on now, you f'n cockroach.
This should be interesting.
Senor - I usually don't get myself upset like that. But, today brought out all the trolls on the internet.
Exactly. That Salka discussion is between trolls.