BoxRec

oogiebe wrote: ↑16 May 2018, 19:49 Ok, I'm done here..."comparing fighters from other eras" version 999,999,999

asta la vista then.

man wrote: ↑17 May 2018, 16:34

gilgamesh wrote: ↑16 May 2018, 15:00Mayweather ranks higher than Pac. He beat him head to head, and had an easy time with Pac's main rival Marquez whom Pac always struggled with.

i am in the camp that believes floyd
managed his career extremely well,
while pac took on crazy risk after crazy
risk in his prime.

don't want to dig too deep into this, since
there are really enough pac-pbf threads
already in existence.

I agree. He never had to fight a 'duran' like leanard did. the first time around To someone's point, not mine, that's the type of figher that would give Mayweather fits. (check one two...am I on the right thread?)

man wrote: ↑17 May 2018, 16:34

gilgamesh wrote: ↑16 May 2018, 15:00Mayweather ranks higher than Pac. He beat him head to head, and had an easy time with Pac's main rival Marquez whom Pac always struggled with.

i am in the camp that believes floyd
managed his career extremely well,
while pac took on crazy risk after crazy
risk in his prime.

don't want to dig too deep into this, since
there are really enough pac-pbf threads
already in existence.

You're right about that, but he was also just plain better than Pacquiao. Which is why he beat him when he's the older fighter. Now I don't doubt that Pac could've beaten him possibly if they'd fought in say 2009 or 2010, but I think Mayweather's career overall is certainly better, but yeah you're right there's enough discussion about this already.

Pac definitely had a marvelous run, and is an All Time Great no question so we're just splitting hairs here. They're both great fighters, and easily rank among the very best of the 21st century so far.

1 and 2 in all likelihood. With B-Hop, and guys like that in the conversation as well.