Page 4 of 4
Re: Carl Froch
Posted: 14 Nov 2018, 13:58
by Loynesy
I heard Costello/Bunce afterwards too. As someone that had a decent amount of money on an Usyk victory, my eyes told me from minute one my money was safe. My Fitbit told me the only time my heart rate changed was in Round 8....
Re: Carl Froch
Posted: 14 Nov 2018, 14:04
by jamamb
i dont see what basis there is to say bellew was a tougher fight then briedis, briedis went the full 12, won more rounds, and had a bigger moment then bellew ever did. bellew boxed well but the writing was starting to get on the wall as soon as round 4-5
funny enough bridies just looked like sh!T, whereas a guy usyk had an easier time with (glowacki) looked pretty good. they are fighting next in the wbss, so at least one of the season 2 wbss finalists will be a usyk victim
Re: Carl Froch
Posted: 14 Nov 2018, 14:48
by MightyWarrior
Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑13 Nov 2018, 20:52
PredatorHayds wrote: ↑13 Nov 2018, 08:56
Carl doesn’t really follow boxing.
He’s going to get found out in these us shows. There’s some divisions where he will know ZERO champions.
I’d wager good money he doesn’t know who Dogboe or Berchelt are.
He didn’t even know who Spence was
during the Brook fight - he kept calling him Spencer. Just shows how fvcking amateurish the whole Sky boxing production is that they don’t bother getting in pundits who actually follow boxing or do the slightest bit of research. And that the producers couldn’t even be bothered to get the message to Froch that he was pronouncing the name of one of the main event participants incorrectly, even given the ample opportunity they would have had as they were cutting to commercials between rounds even though it was a PPV.
Still, nice work if you can get it, eh.
Well put, The whole sky boxing production is fornicating diabolical - it may as well be run by a team of blue arsed baboons.
Re: Carl Froch
Posted: 15 Nov 2018, 06:05
by whiskey
Re: Carl Froch
Posted: 15 Nov 2018, 07:33
by jamamb
didnt froch only give usyk 1 round? he certainly didnt give him 3 because in the 6th he had given usyk 0 rounds, not even the 5th where the tide was clearly turning and he stopped bellew in his tracks with a nice left cross that was a easily the fights best punch till then
Re: Carl Froch
Posted: 15 Nov 2018, 07:43
by Counter-puncher
Loynesy wrote: ↑14 Nov 2018, 13:58
I heard Costello/Bunce afterwards too. As someone that had a decent amount of money on an Usyk victory, my eyes told me from minute one my money was safe. My Fitbit told me the only time my heart rate changed was in Round 8....
I doubt Usyk's heartrate was extended too much more than that
Re: Carl Froch
Posted: 15 Nov 2018, 08:55
by Ruthless-RKO
jamamb wrote: ↑15 Nov 2018, 07:33
didnt froch only give usyk 1 round? he certainly didnt give him 3 because in the 6th he had given usyk 0 rounds, not even the 5th where the tide was clearly turning and he stopped bellew in his tracks with a nice left cross that was a easily the fights best punch till then
He basically gave Bellew all the rounds. And had 2 rounds even. He did not give Usyk a winning round. Or maybe he gave him the 7th? But after 6 rounds, Usyk never had a single 10-9 round.
Re: Carl Froch
Posted: 15 Nov 2018, 09:12
by samwbr
When are sky showing the card again?
