Page 4 of 4

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Posted: 08 Dec 2018, 11:02
by ironbeard
Stuarty wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 10:57
ironbeard wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 10:20
Stuarty wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 10:02

Aye that pricks pockets would've been bulging on the way out the Staples Centre last week :lol:
To bring this pity party back to reality; if the KDs had not happened it would have depended on who the Mexican judge scored those two rounds for that would have determined whether his card would have been for Wilder, Fury, or a draw.

1. 115-113 Wilder = if the KDs did not happen and he scored both rounds for Wilder.

2. 114-114 Draw = if the KDs did not happen and he split those rounds between them.

3. 115-113 Fury = if the KDs did not happen and he scored both rounds for Fury.

4. If the KDs had not happened, how the Mexican judge scored the fight would not have mattered. It would have been at minimum a split decision for Fury and quite possibly a UD.

Conclusion = the Mexican judge’s card was entirely legitimate. There was no robbery.

Resume pathetic pity party.
Hardly a pity party. It's my opinion Fury won the fight clearly knockdowns or not. Wilders body language at the bell said it all. He thought he'd lost and he should've. The cards were abysmal.
If Fury could have stood through 12, he’d have had his win. Wilder made sure that did not happen.

Fury lost clearly in my view. Did a great schooling of Wilder there from his back on the canvas.

Difference is I recognize that a draw is a legitimate result. Who is the biased ones again on here?

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Posted: 08 Dec 2018, 11:11
by Stuarty
ironbeard wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 11:02
Stuarty wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 10:57
ironbeard wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 10:20
To bring this pity party back to reality; if the KDs had not happened it would have depended on who the Mexican judge scored those two rounds for that would have determined whether his card would have been for Wilder, Fury, or a draw.

1. 115-113 Wilder = if the KDs did not happen and he scored both rounds for Wilder.

2. 114-114 Draw = if the KDs did not happen and he split those rounds between them.

3. 115-113 Fury = if the KDs did not happen and he scored both rounds for Fury.

4. If the KDs had not happened, how the Mexican judge scored the fight would not have mattered. It would have been at minimum a split decision for Fury and quite possibly a UD.

Conclusion = the Mexican judge’s card was entirely legitimate. There was no robbery.

Resume pathetic pity party.
Hardly a pity party. It's my opinion Fury won the fight clearly knockdowns or not. Wilders body language at the bell said it all. He thought he'd lost and he should've. The cards were abysmal.
If Fury could have stood through 12, he’d have had his win. Wilder made sure that did not happen.

Fury lost clearly in my view. Did a great schooling of Wilder there from his back on the canvas.

Difference is I recognize that a draw is a legitimate result. Who is the biased ones again on here?
You must've been watching a different fight from me bro :maybe:

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Posted: 08 Dec 2018, 11:32
by ironbeard
Stuarty wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 11:11
ironbeard wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 11:02
Stuarty wrote: 08 Dec 2018, 10:57

Hardly a pity party. It's my opinion Fury won the fight clearly knockdowns or not. Wilders body language at the bell said it all. He thought he'd lost and he should've. The cards were abysmal.
If Fury could have stood through 12, he’d have had his win. Wilder made sure that did not happen.

Fury lost clearly in my view. Did a great schooling of Wilder there from his back on the canvas.

Difference is I recognize that a draw is a legitimate result. Who is the biased ones again on here?
You must've been watching a different fight from me bro :maybe:
:OhYes: obviously.