BoxRec

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 13:19 Absurd.

If that's your idea of a rebuttal I'm very glad you're not my defense attorney. I'd probably end up strapped into 'Old smokey' having been charged for jaywalking.

candyslim wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 04:58

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 13:19 Absurd.

If that's your idea of a rebuttal I'm very glad you're not my defense attorney. I'd probably end up strapped into 'Old smokey' having been charged for jaywalking.

candyslim wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 04:58

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 13:19 Absurd.

If that's your idea of a rebuttal I'm very glad you're not my defense attorney. I'd probably end up strapped into 'Old smokey' having been charged for jaywalking.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑19 Jan 2019, 11:42

I know purses are never posted in the UK unless it’s PPV..

In the US, the commissions alway post them.. then writers like Dan Rafael post them on their articles.

Thoughts on this?

I'd much rather see politicians' purses and who is "donating" to them and how much. Also I'd much rather examine the off the books "donations" that certain referees and judges get after certain high profile fights, say in Las Vegas.

I like to know the purses. It tells a lot about a boxer’s following and popularity. Boxing doesn’t give money away like most pro sports. Boxers in most cases earn every dollar the hardest way. Why not post it?

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 14:07

candyslim wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 04:58

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 13:19 Absurd.

If that's your idea of a rebuttal I'm very glad you're not my defense attorney. I'd probably end up strapped into 'Old smokey' having been charged for jaywalking.

Well I guess expecting you to back up your absurd comment with intelligent reasoning would be way too much to ask of the man who debates in pictures, one emoticon at a time.

No don't bother. I know what's coming ....

candyslim wrote: ↑28 Jan 2019, 03:39

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 14:07

candyslim wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 04:58

If that's your idea of a rebuttal I'm very glad you're not my defense attorney. I'd probably end up strapped into 'Old smokey' having been charged for jaywalking.

Well I guess expecting you to back up your absurd comment with intelligent reasoning would be way too much to ask of the man who debates in pictures, one emoticon at a time.

No don't bother. I know what's coming ....

I'm not going to waste time with you on one of your silly tangents. You ignore any rebuttal and claim they were never given. I couldn't think of a less 'important' topic. I get it though, you want to know everything about wilder.

it's not like it's critically important, but having a choice I'd rather say yes..

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑28 Jan 2019, 09:18

candyslim wrote: ↑28 Jan 2019, 03:39

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 14:07

Well I guess expecting you to back up your absurd comment with intelligent reasoning would be way too much to ask of the man who debates in pictures, one emoticon at a time.

No don't bother. I know what's coming ....

I'm not going to waste time with you on one of your silly tangents. You ignore any rebuttal and claim they were never given. I couldn't think of a less 'important' topic. I get it though, you want to know everything about wilder.

I don't ignore any rebuttal unless you consider a or a to be a rebuttal, and quite clearly you do.

If you condemn someone's post as 'absurd' the least you can do is explain why. There is nothing I said in that post that is controversial, it is all a matter of record. If You have no interest, or my post is not worth your valuable time, then why even bother to comment?

When you are asked to back up your comments but you can't or you don't, how do you think that makes you look?

I already did. You seem desperate for my approval. How do you think that makes you look? Anyway, have fun.

In your dreams my friend, and only in your dreams.

You already did what? Posted a smiley? Well done.