Page 4 of 6

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:08
by oogiebe
dagilechia wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:03 Female boxing makes as much sense as making chess tournament for idiots
That could prove quite entertaining though. :maybe:

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:09
by samdance
dagilechia wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:03 Female boxing makes as much sense as making chess tournament for idiots
Good luck with the tournament

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:11
by Enlightened-One
oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 14:50 First off that is NOT what I'm essentially saying for the umpteenth time, you retarded arse! How could I be even remotely say that while you also say I haven't even mentioned Ann Wolfe!

You make a delusional conclusion from my original post, which was a good faith response to your own post, and then accuse me of ducking a question from that delusional conclusion as if that was my exact post or something. What in the hell is wrong with you?

I am familiar with her work and who she is and have no desire to 'prove' any of that with you. My patience is at an end. My Lord! No wonder everyone makes fun of you! :lol:
Do you need me to quote your own words from your initial response to my questions?

You have a chance to avoid embarrassment, so I’d advise you to take it.

You still continue to avoid answering any questions related to Ann Wolfe.

You have been reminded to answer the same questions six times but you won’t answer them.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:12
by jamamb
samdance wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:09 Good luck with the tournament
:clap:

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:12
by dagilechia
samdance wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:07Why?
female champion is the best among the worst, female sports generally make no sense, male champion is the best human in the world, female champion is the best human in the world excluding thousands or sometimes probably even dozens of thousands males. it makes no sense. female boxing championship bout is like watching #965 vs #1478 man fighting, at best.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:13
by oogiebe
Enlightened-One wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:11 Do you need me to quote your own words from your initial response to my questions?

You have a chance to avoid embarrassment, so I’d advise you to take it.

You still continue to avoid answering any questions related to Ann Wolfe.

You have been reminded to answer the same questions six times but you won’t answer them.
Yes. Please give me your interpretation of my words and let's see if you really understood my response or maybe you'll just keep on being EO, or Verlicht or whatever your name is.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:16
by oogiebe
oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 13:55 We have very different bodies. I want my trainer to completely understand what's happening to me in that ring. If I get hit low, I want a guy who knows what that feels like to be in my corner, not some woman who tells me to walk it off. It's more than getting direction. The trainer needs to be completely in tune with me during the rounds. Having a different sex in my corner takes away from that.
Dear EO,

This was my first response to your original question. My response to your subsequent question on Wolfe is this: There are always exceptions.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:20
by samdance
dagilechia wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:12 female champion is the best among the worst, female sports generally make no sense, male champion is the best human in the world, female champion is the best human in the world excluding thousands or sometimes probably even dozens of thousands males. it makes no sense. female boxing championship bout is like watching #965 vs #1478 man fighting, at best.
So with that logic lomochenko is terrible...whats the point in watching him if he can't even beat the 500th heavyweight

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:22
by oogiebe
samdance wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:20 So with that logic lomochenko is terrible...whats the point in watching him if he can't even beat the 500th heavyweight
That conclusion from the other poster's words is non-sensical. Maybe if Woman's Boxing adopted the same format, it would be better. MMA is a great example. Both men and women are equally entertaining.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:24
by jamamb
its just very entertaining imo, very little firepower or drama to the fights , also little depth. what interesting opponents does shields keep fighting in a division with 31 ppl

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:26
by oogiebe
jamamb wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:24 its just very entertaining imo, very little firepower or drama to the fights , also little depth. what interesting opponents does shields keep fighting in a division with 31 ppl
You meant NOT very entertaining. Yes?

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:29
by samdance
oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:22 That conclusion from the other poster's words is non-sensical. Maybe if Woman's Boxing adopted the same format, it would be better. MMA is a great example. Both men and women are equally entertaining.
Sorry are you the guy who said he wouldn't have a women in his corner because she doesn't have testicles?

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:32
by oogiebe
samdance wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:29 Sorry are you the guy who said he wouldn't have a women in his corner because she doesn't have testicles?
LMFAO!!!

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:33
by oogiebe
samdance wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:29 Sorry are you the guy who said he wouldn't have a women in his corner because she doesn't have testicles?
So you are putting yourself in the EO category! :lol:

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:41
by Enlightened-One
oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:16 Dear EO,

This was my first response to your original question. My response to your subsequent question on Wolfe is this: There are always exceptions.
Yet your quote doesn’t directly address ann Wolfe.

The reason why I mentioned her name, was because she is a very competent trainer, but you claimed that women couldn’t be, because they didn’t appreciate the sort of pain men endured due to low blows.

Ann Wolfe wouldn’t be an exception if more men gave females an opportunity to train them.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:45
by oogiebe
Enlightened-One wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:41 Yet your quote doesn’t directly address ann Wolfe.

The reason why I mentioned her name, was because she is a very competent trainer, but you claimed that women couldn’t be, because they didn’t appreciate the sort of pain men endured due to low blows.

Ann Wolfe wouldn’t be an exception if more men gave females an opportunity to train them.
Nope, not my point. Try again.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:47
by Enlightened-One
oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:45 Nope, not my point. Try again.
Did you say the following?

We have very different bodies. I want my trainer to completely understand what's happening to me in that ring. If I get hit low, I want a guy who knows what that feels like to be in my corner, not some woman who tells me to walk it off.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:51
by oogiebe
Enlightened-One wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:47 Did you say the following?

We have very different bodies. I want my trainer to completely understand what's happening to me in that ring. If I get hit low, I want a guy who knows what that feels like to be in my corner, not some woman who tells me to walk it off.
Not full context.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:52
by SenorPipino
oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:08 That could prove quite entertaining though. :maybe:
Yes. There's a few guys here who might want to sign up.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:53
by Enlightened-One
oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:51 Not full context.
Yet you repeatedly cite the very same words time and time again.

Do you need me to quote each instance or would you prefer to defend your stance honestly?

You kept avoiding commenting on Ann Wolfe... and you still won’t directly address my questions about her ability as being an effective trainer of male pugilists.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:53
by Onetimeonly
oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:33 So you are putting yourself in the EO category! :lol:
I believe he thinks with 10,000 hours of practice any of us could be world champion.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:53
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:52 Yes. There's a few guys here who might want to sign up.
Apparently I'm fully engaged with one of them right here in this thread! :lol:

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:55
by oogiebe
Enlightened-One wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:53 Yet you repeatedly cite the very same words time and time again.

Do you need me to quote each instance or would you prefer to defend your stance honestly?

You kept avoiding commenting on Ann Wolfe... and you still won’t directly address my questions about her ability as being an effective trainer of male pugilists.
Frankly, I'm losing interest. Not sure what your goal is here. She was successful with Kirkland. That's one.

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 15:56
by oogiebe
Onetimeonly wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:53 I believe he thinks with 10,000 hours of practice any of us could be world champion.
LOL! :lol:

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Posted: 21 Apr 2019, 16:34
by dagilechia
samdance wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 15:20 So with that logic lomochenko is terrible...whats the point in watching him if he can't even beat the 500th heavyweight
and that is why HW is the most popular and most important division