Canelo did not land better shots, and he landed fewer shots. Golovkin took a challenge of Team Alvarez saying that he was one-dimensional and outboxed Canelo in the second fight.
If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101191
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
So what if his face was destroyed?
Some boxers mark up more than others and quicker as well. What's your point?
Some boxers mark up more than others and quicker as well. What's your point?
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
... and it gets worse with age.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 12:57 So what if his face was destroyed?
Some boxers mark up more than others and quicker as well. What's your point?
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
canelo won the rematch about 7-5, no one was destroyed
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
ggg always marks up, he looked worse after rosado then he did vs canelo
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101191
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
Clear as day. Canelo fought like a guy just trying to last the distance first time around.
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
Your post makes no sense.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 12:53 Canelo did not land better shots, and he landed fewer shots. Golovkin took a challenge of Team Alvarez saying that he was one-dimensional and outboxed Canelo in the second fight.
So Canelo landed less shots but GGG looked like a train hit him and Canelo looked fine?
Canelo landed the better shots.
Swelling, bruising, and bleeding are objective markers to use when analyzing punches and their effect. GGG wasn't marked in the 1st Canelo fight (when many GGG fanboys say Canelo cheated) nor was GGG marked up against Jacobs. In fact GGG was never remotely marked up like he was against Canelo in the rematch.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 12:57 So what if his face was destroyed?
Some boxers mark up more than others and quicker as well. What's your point?
This is just GGG fanboyism. And it's flat out wrong
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
totally trash post bruh, if i were a ggg fan boy i wouldnt be emphasizing how a total mediocre gatekeeper marked him up or posting that canelo beat him, you obviously havent read many of my opinions on ggg 
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: If GGG looks good vs Rolls I'd like to see him fighting Andrade or Jermall!
Where are these stupid new posters like Bjl12 coming from? How can you not understand that different people have different skin and soft tissue sensitivity? Some people get bruises from a touch. Plus bruising becomes worse with age.