BoxRec

Susej_SOG wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 12:50 115-113 to Canelo

GGG face was destroyed, GGG was too precavide, Canelo landed better.shots and was better in defense

Canelo did not land better shots, and he landed fewer shots. Golovkin took a challenge of Team Alvarez saying that he was one-dimensional and outboxed Canelo in the second fight.

So what if his face was destroyed?

Some boxers mark up more than others and quicker as well. What's your point?

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 12:57 So what if his face was destroyed?

Some boxers mark up more than others and quicker as well. What's your point?

... and it gets worse with age.

canelo won the rematch about 7-5, no one was destroyed

jamamb wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 15:11 canelo won the rematch about 7-5, no one was destroyed

. . . in either fight.

ggg always marks up, he looked worse after rosado then he did vs canelo

jamamb wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 15:11 canelo won the rematch about 7-5, no one was destroyed

Golovkin won the rematch about 7-5, no one was destroyed.

Split the difference and say the 2nd fight was the rightful draw, and I wouldn't argue that.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 15:17 Golovkin won the rematch about 7-5, no one was destroyed.

Split the difference and say the 2nd fight was the rightful draw, and I wouldn't argue that.

And GGG won the first?

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 15:58 And GGG won the first?

Clear as day. Canelo fought like a guy just trying to last the distance first time around.

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 12:53 Canelo did not land better shots, and he landed fewer shots. Golovkin took a challenge of Team Alvarez saying that he was one-dimensional and outboxed Canelo in the second fight.

Your post makes no sense.

So Canelo landed less shots but GGG looked like a train hit him and Canelo looked fine?

Canelo landed the better shots.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 12:57 So what if his face was destroyed?

Some boxers mark up more than others and quicker as well. What's your point?

Swelling, bruising, and bleeding are objective markers to use when analyzing punches and their effect. GGG wasn't marked in the 1st Canelo fight (when many GGG fanboys say Canelo cheated) nor was GGG marked up against Jacobs. In fact GGG was never remotely marked up like he was against Canelo in the rematch.

jamamb wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 15:16 ggg always marks up, he looked worse after rosado then he did vs canelo

This is just GGG fanboyism. And it's flat out wrong

totally trash post bruh, if i were a ggg fan boy i wouldnt be emphasizing how a total mediocre gatekeeper marked him up or posting that canelo beat him, you obviously havent read many of my opinions on ggg

Where are these stupid new posters like Bjl12 coming from? How can you not understand that different people have different skin and soft tissue sensitivity? Some people get bruises from a touch. Plus bruising becomes worse with age.