Page 4 of 7

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 07:50
by danconnollyeire
I think everyone's missing the obviously here. It's probably the Fury insult that did it. If they didn't act fast and Fury was furious, then they'd lose MTK sponsorship and channel would be fvcked

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 07:54
by Matt W
keirw wrote: 04 Feb 2020, 21:34
Muttley wrote: 04 Feb 2020, 06:36 Never heard of him but this is a perfect example of why I left the sport and journalism in general a while ago . No disrespect to those boxing/sports writers/journos but this is what happens when untrained 'journalists' are let loose with a camera and a dictation phone. Of course I know the profession has changed and I changed with it. But in my day we had to go to college/University and work our way up on the local papers and radio stations. We were trained properly and respected boundaries but that does not happen nowadays.

That said I trained and worked with some excellent young sports journalists over the years and am very proud of them so there are some really good young and talented people in the profession as well. I just wish boxing promoters PR companies would vet people properly
100% true, so many online 'joirnalist' care less about reporting facts and more about shouting their mouths off and being as controversial as possible.

Youtube has lowered standards across the board, though.

My kids used to watch cartoons, they were crap, but at least they had some sort of story element to them and often had underline messages about helping others or working as a team.

Now they watch videos of grown adults acting like kids. It makes my skin crawl.
To be fair though, in my day we had Timmy Mallett. And Jimmy Savile.

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 07:59
by danconnollyeire
https://twitter.com/DavidMCov92/status/ ... 05/photo/1

Fowler being very hypocritical. Both abhorrent tbf

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 09:15
by samwbr
danconnollyeire wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 07:59 https://twitter.com/DavidMCov92/status/ ... 05/photo/1

Fowler being very hypocritical. Both abhorrent tbf
Unfortunately there is a large element who would agree with Fowlers incoherent twaddle, and this IFL kid.

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 10:38
by danconnollyeire
samwbr wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 09:15
danconnollyeire wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 07:59 https://twitter.com/DavidMCov92/status/ ... 05/photo/1

Fowler being very hypocritical. Both abhorrent tbf
Unfortunately there is a large element who would agree with Fowlers incoherent twaddle, and this IFL kid.
Yeah these days everyone seems to have to pick a side where in reality, they're both dicks

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 11:13
by Glass Joe
banjo wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 05:22 IFL is the boxing equivalent of those football channels like Goldbridge, blobby Robby the Arsenal fan and the human baboon experiment that is Stephen Howson.
I actually saw Goldridge the first time when his Burnley video went viral on twitter. Watched a few of his best bits, he's clearly acting to bring in the views.

You don't really need to go uni to get into journalism if going down the Youtube route, it's just about being entertaining and bringing in the views. Hearn carries IFL tv for the last 2 years.

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 11:35
by MarkMcBurney
Matt W wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 07:54
keirw wrote: 04 Feb 2020, 21:34
100% true, so many online 'joirnalist' care less about reporting facts and more about shouting their mouths off and being as controversial as possible.

Youtube has lowered standards across the board, though.

My kids used to watch cartoons, they were crap, but at least they had some sort of story element to them and often had underline messages about helping others or working as a team.

Now they watch videos of grown adults acting like kids. It makes my skin crawl.
To be fair though, in my day we had Timmy Mallett. And Jimmy Savile.
Nah us cool kids were busy listening to Gary Glitter. Ah sh!t....!

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 11:43
by Glass Joe
Rolf Harris and his didgeridoo for me :KO: :KO: :KO:

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 12:31
by Glass Joe
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sport ... weets.html

Daily Mail writer must not be a fan of youtube lot for him to publish that.




Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 13:41
by Twinkle Toes
Things must have gotten bad, he's had to turn the heating off

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 13:50
by smiling assassin
Kids got to be so careful growing up in today's world. Social media can come back and hurt you years down the line. Glad I missed it early doors

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 15:35
by Glass Joe
Just let it blow over it will be yesterday's news in April, people will be talking about something else then. Sure he can come back for the DDD - Joyce fight. Kugan will only get rid of him if his sponsors all go.

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 15:36
by Stuarty
Twinkle Toes wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 13:41 Things must have gotten bad, he's had to turn the heating off
:lol:

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 15:37
by Stuarty
Where's his fancy watch in his apology video.... Cash converters :yay:

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 15:54
by smiling assassin
Stuarty wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:37 Where's his fancy watch in his apology video.... Cash converters :yay:
It was jekyll anyway :lol:

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 15:59
by Stuarty
smiling assassin wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:54
Stuarty wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:37 Where's his fancy watch in his apology video.... Cash converters :yay:
It was jekyll anyway :lol:
Wonder if his Mrs has patched him yet. She is well tidy :TU:

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 15:59
by margaret thatcher
All seems a bit blown over the top?

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 16:00
by Stuarty
Tweets came back to haunt him like a Harvey Weinstein rape :yay:

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 16:21
by smiling assassin
Stuarty wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:59
smiling assassin wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:54

It was jekyll anyway :lol:
Wonder if his Mrs has patched him yet. She is well tidy :TU:
You can't say that without a pic up mate. Me cock is in hand waiting

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 16:32
by Stuarty
smiling assassin wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 16:21
Stuarty wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:59

Wonder if his Mrs has patched him yet. She is well tidy :TU:
You can't say that without a pic up mate. Me cock is in hand waiting
:lol: :lol: I've got new comp and haven't a clue how to post pics with it. Whenever i try it doesn't work. Laura Deacon i think her name is or google Umar ifl girlfriend lol

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 16:37
by Glass Joe
Umar can just avoid going to Liverpool. FW and Hennessy have avoided going there for years :OhYes: :OhYes: :OhYes: In fact i don't think Hennessy has ever promoted a show in Liverpool :maybe: :maybe:

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 16:54
by cormack
cant feel sorry for anyone who puts their name to such disgusting diatribe .

that said i had no clue who the guy is - I mean was :D

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 17:51
by Boxerbeetle
margaret thatcher wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:59 All seems a bit blown over the top?
A rarity indeed for Twitter.

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 18:00
by 3132DW
margaret thatcher wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:59 All seems a bit blown over the top?
I’d agree with you - problem for him is the Scousers are offended at everything and as soon as you say anything about them they go hunting in packs.

He’s entitled to his opinion about Liverpool fans just the same way Anthony Fowler is about Muslims - doesn’t mean either are right but it’s his opinion (also when he was 16)

What one of us wouldn’t have said or done something stupid at 16.

To me it seems a bit of a witch hunt because Liverpool fans don’t like anyone daring to question them - they have short memories about Heysel.

Re: Umar IFL Umar

Posted: 05 Feb 2020, 19:48
by TheGman
3132DW wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 18:00
margaret thatcher wrote: 05 Feb 2020, 15:59 All seems a bit blown over the top?
I’d agree with you - problem for him is the Scousers are offended at everything and as soon as you say anything about them they go hunting in packs.

He’s entitled to his opinion about Liverpool fans just the same way Anthony Fowler is about Muslims - doesn’t mean either are right but it’s his opinion (also when he was 16)

What one of us wouldn’t have said or done something stupid at 16.

To me it seems a bit of a witch hunt because Liverpool fans don’t like anyone daring to question them - they have short memories about Heysel.
Do some research before you open your uneducated mouth,liverpool hold a memorial every year and have a banner on the clubs website which reads "in memoria e Amicizia"
May 29th 1985