Page 4 of 4
Re: Sr gives cold replies to HW topics?
Posted: 08 Dec 2020, 18:27
by Steveh583
coghaugen11 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2020, 18:16
Steveh583 wrote: ↑05 Dec 2020, 16:25
coghaugen11 wrote: ↑05 Dec 2020, 12:54
Not according to professional judges. None were close to true gifts apart from one (Schommer) in reality, and that can be forgiven for flying 48hrs and fighting 7k ft above sea etc, fasting for 72hrs before et al.
They were all in the top 10. Almost all fighting for other versions too.
ray close beat him if i remember rightly. and I'm sure there were others. maybe it was sugar boy malinga but i'd have to watch it again.
Laughable.
jesus are you still trying to talk about chris eubank. your obsession is genuinely unhealthy,
Re: Sr gives cold replies to HW topics?
Posted: 08 Dec 2020, 19:55
by Coco
Dan Schommer was a clear winner.
Eubank gave us some of the greatest nights against Benn and Watson and also redeemed himself against Thompson.
However he gave us many terrible nights where the only entertainment was the ringwalk!
During his world tour, I dunno if it was his heavy schedule, weight making, thoughts of Watson or the motorway worker, he was usually well below par and was fortunate to get decisions.
Against Wharton and Rochianni we did well but largely he was poor.
Re: Sr gives cold replies to HW topics?
Posted: 09 Dec 2020, 03:45
by Steveh583
Coco wrote: ↑08 Dec 2020, 19:55
Dan Schommer was a clear winner.
Eubank gave us some of the greatest nights against Benn and Watson and also redeemed himself against Thompson.
However he gave us many terrible nights where the only entertainment was the ringwalk!
During his world tour, I dunno if it was his heavy schedule, weight making, thoughts of Watson or the motorway worker, he was usually well below par and was fortunate to get decisions.
Against Wharton and Rochianni we did well but largely he was poor.
don't say that mate, this guys now stalking me from thread to thread cos i dare insult Eubank. He'll have it in for you too.
you are 100% correct tho