Re: The Marvelous One has died
Posted: 14 Mar 2021, 13:23
Again show respect, that is what I'm asking for. Thanks
Again show respect, that is what I'm asking for. Thanks
Wasn't saying it to be disrespectful.Old bones Ian wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 13:23Again show respect, that is what I'm asking for. Thanks
The rumours will continue to fly unless it is categorically stated that he had not received the vaccine in the last few days.Tarquin Tarpaulin IV wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 13:22 From the Mail Online: Anti-vaxxers hijack boxing legend Marvin Hagler's death after rival Tommy Hearns said he was 'in ICU fighting after-effects of vaccine': Boxer's family says 66-year-old actually died of natural causes at home.
Hagler's son James told TMZ his father was rushed to hospital with chest pains and was experiencing trouble breathing before dying about four hours later.
Tommy Hearns posts: 'Our love and respect to Marvin and his family, this is not an anti vaccine campaign.. it's outrageous to have that in mind during the passing of a King, Legend, Father, Husband and so much more.'
Hopkins would have feigned injury and tried to get the marvellous one disqualified.high tower 1 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 14:24 Best middleweight since ray robinson for me. People were talking up Hopkins record over him but I could only see him putting a beating on Hopkins.
That's a nice way of putting it. I was just going to say that I rate Monzon as the best Middleweight ever.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 14:58 If Monzon ruled the 70s, Hagler certainly ruled 5 years of the 80s!
Yeah, Monzon was the best.Jimmy2020 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:07That's a nice way of putting it. I was just going to say that I rate Monzon as the best Middleweight ever.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 14:58 If Monzon ruled the 70s, Hagler certainly ruled 5 years of the 80s!
I must of missed something about monzon, the fights I’ve seen of his I’ve not been impressed. He wasn’t even in a great era unlike Hagler.Jimmy2020 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:07That's a nice way of putting it. I was just going to say that I rate Monzon as the best Middleweight ever.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 14:58 If Monzon ruled the 70s, Hagler certainly ruled 5 years of the 80s!
Monzon's era was great. Double wins over Benvenuti, Griffith and Valdez along with the schooling of Briscoe were bigger, than the best achievements of the great Hagler.smiling assassin wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:14I must of missed something about monzon, the fights I’ve seen of his I’ve not been impressed. He wasn’t even in a great era unlike Hagler.Jimmy2020 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:07That's a nice way of putting it. I was just going to say that I rate Monzon as the best Middleweight ever.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 14:58 If Monzon ruled the 70s, Hagler certainly ruled 5 years of the 80s!
I have Monzon number 1. One of my favorite fighters ever.DrDuke wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:22Monzon's era was great. Double wins over Benvenuti, Griffith and Valdez along with the schooling of Briscoe were bigger, than the best achievements of the great Hagler.smiling assassin wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:14I must of missed something about monzon, the fights I’ve seen of his I’ve not been impressed. He wasn’t even in a great era unlike Hagler.
Yeah, I remember, that we agree on this.oogiebe wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:24I have Monzon number 1. One of my favorite fighters ever.DrDuke wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:22Monzon's era was great. Double wins over Benvenuti, Griffith and Valdez along with the schooling of Briscoe were bigger, than the best achievements of the great Hagler.smiling assassin wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:14
I must of missed something about monzon, the fights I’ve seen of his I’ve not been impressed. He wasn’t even in a great era unlike Hagler.
If you know what you’re looking at, Monzon mastered distance, timing and ring generalship better than any fighter in history.smiling assassin wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:14I must of missed something about monzon, the fights I’ve seen of his I’ve not been impressed. He wasn’t even in a great era unlike Hagler.Jimmy2020 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:07That's a nice way of putting it. I was just going to say that I rate Monzon as the best Middleweight ever.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 14:58 If Monzon ruled the 70s, Hagler certainly ruled 5 years of the 80s!
Sorry my mistake his era was full of greats but he did not fight them all in their prime. My dad always said the Valdez fight should of happened years before. Benvenuti was past his best. I’m not saying people shouldn’t rate him as the best MW just that I don’t think he looked spectacular.DrDuke wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:22Monzon's era was great. Double wins over Benvenuti, Griffith and Valdez along with the schooling of Briscoe were bigger, than the best achievements of the great Hagler.smiling assassin wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:14I must of missed something about monzon, the fights I’ve seen of his I’ve not been impressed. He wasn’t even in a great era unlike Hagler.
He didn’t look spectacular. That’s why he’s so good!smiling assassin wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:50Sorry my mistake his era was full of greats but he did not fight them all in their prime. My dad always said the Valdez fight should of happened years before. Benvenuti was past his best. I’m not saying people shouldn’t rate him as the best MW just that I don’t think he looked spectacular.DrDuke wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:22Monzon's era was great. Double wins over Benvenuti, Griffith and Valdez along with the schooling of Briscoe were bigger, than the best achievements of the great Hagler.smiling assassin wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 15:14
I must of missed something about monzon, the fights I’ve seen of his I’ve not been impressed. He wasn’t even in a great era unlike Hagler.