Page 4 of 4
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 18 Nov 2021, 13:22
by ironbeard
jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 13:08
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 13:04
bobcatbox wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 10:59
Jimmy McDonnell, man, I don’t think that’s super fair. Canelo beat every belt holder at 168. Froch had an awesome and fun career but let’s be honest did he beat anybody that you think Canelo couldn’t have handled just as easily?
I know we’re comparing apples to oranges here, but I’m not sure Froch could’ve beaten Callum Smith or Billy Joe. Smith would have been a formidable opponent for Froch, and BJS’s style is a really tough matchup for the Cobra.
Pascal
Taylor
Johnson
Bute
Groves
Taylor would have been a tricky one, at either 160 or 168, people write Taylor off now, but he was a great boxer, and had some very good physical gifts, he was somewhat on the slide, by the time he got to Froch, but he still had great boxing skills.
Johnson, - too one dimensional, but he'd have given Canelo 12 hard paced rounds for certain, as he was rock hard.
Groves, yeah, never quite sure how to rate groves, had a serious dig, could box, but not sure how great he really was, though he certainly handled Eubank Jr with ease.
Bute, looked a million dollars until Froch spiked his career. Good call.
Pascal, good fighter, and went on to do good things at 175 too, a very aggressive fighter, and Froch went to war with him and won.
Groves was better than Smith when Froch done him.
Pascal was rock hard. The version that lost to BHop would be an extremely tough fight for Canelo.
Taylor at his best would give Canelo fits.
Bute in top form would be very dangerous for Canelo.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 01:35
by bobcatbox
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 13:04
bobcatbox wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 10:59
jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 04:14
Let's calm down here.
At 168, Canelo has done nowhere near enough to suggest he would have beaten Froch with ease.
Jimmy McDonnell, man, I don’t think that’s super fair. Canelo beat every belt holder at 168. Froch had an awesome and fun career but let’s be honest did he beat anybody that you think Canelo couldn’t have handled just as easily?
I know we’re comparing apples to oranges here, but I’m not sure Froch could’ve beaten Callum Smith or Billy Joe. Smith would have been a formidable opponent for Froch, and BJS’s style is a really tough matchup for the Cobra.
Pascal
Taylor
Johnson
Bute
Groves
Pascal - easy Canelo victory
Taylor - a tough one but Canelo would’ve smoked him
Johnson - bro come on
Bute - again…
Groves - would’ve given Canelo hell and gotten himself knocked out by the fifth round
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 11:21
by jamesmcdonnell
bobcatbox wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021, 01:35
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 13:04
bobcatbox wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 10:59
Jimmy McDonnell, man, I don’t think that’s super fair. Canelo beat every belt holder at 168. Froch had an awesome and fun career but let’s be honest did he beat anybody that you think Canelo couldn’t have handled just as easily?
I know we’re comparing apples to oranges here, but I’m not sure Froch could’ve beaten Callum Smith or Billy Joe. Smith would have been a formidable opponent for Froch, and BJS’s style is a really tough matchup for the Cobra.
Pascal
Taylor
Johnson
Bute
Groves
Pascal - easy Canelo victory
Taylor - a tough one but Canelo would’ve smoked him
Johnson - bro come on
Bute - again…
Groves - would’ve given Canelo hell and gotten himself knocked out by the fifth round
I think you vastly overrate Canelo and underrate everybody else that has ever campaigned at 168.
It took him 11 rounds to catch up with plant, yet he would have smoked Groves in 5? Based on what?
Canelo has had a grand total of 3 fights at 168, one of those against a feather fisted 160 lb fighter coming up in weight for a retirement payday.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 11:32
by ironbeard
bobcatbox wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021, 01:35
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 13:04
bobcatbox wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021, 10:59
Jimmy McDonnell, man, I don’t think that’s super fair. Canelo beat every belt holder at 168. Froch had an awesome and fun career but let’s be honest did he beat anybody that you think Canelo couldn’t have handled just as easily?
I know we’re comparing apples to oranges here, but I’m not sure Froch could’ve beaten Callum Smith or Billy Joe. Smith would have been a formidable opponent for Froch, and BJS’s style is a really tough matchup for the Cobra.
Pascal
Taylor
Johnson
Bute
Groves
Pascal - easy Canelo victory
Taylor - a tough one but Canelo would’ve smoked him
Johnson - bro come on
Bute - again…
Groves - would’ve given Canelo hell and gotten himself knocked out by the fifth round
Thanks for your opinion.
Though I disagree with most of what you say, the only big problem I have with it is your disrespect for Johnson and Bute. While it is true that Canelo would very likely defeat them, neither fight would be easy, and both fighters would compete strongly with anyone Canelo has fought at SMW.
Canelo has defeated no one like Carl Froch at SMW.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 12:00
by bobcatbox
I respect Johnson but not enough to believe that in 2011 - at the time he fought and lost to Froch - that he would have posed much of a fight for Canelo. He lost three in a row after losing a close decision to Froch. Canelo would have smoked him.
I simply agree to disagree on Bute being a hard fight for Canelo.
While I do agree that the body of work is limited at 168, is there a doubt that if he stuck around and defended his undisputed title he would likely lose to anyone else? Benavidez gives him a good fight but Canelo enters that at least a 3:1 favorite.
I do not believe that, with the exception of Andre Ward, the 168 pound division was immensely better in 2009-13 than it is today. But I’m fine to disagree on that as well.
Let me put it this way perhaps. If Canelo had entered the Super Six tourney, is there a doubt he would have beaten everyone (or at the very least been an odds on favorite to beat everyone) except Ward?
And tbh, in my opinion, I think Canelo beats Ward in what would be a very good fight.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 12:15
by apollo creed
Bute had some decent wins like Andrade, Bika and Berrio.
Anyway Pascal, Kessler and prime Groves are top notch wins for Froch.
Dirrell wasn't a clear win for Froch.
Taylor was a decent win.
Bute was an ok-ish win.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 12:21
by adislav123
what if ward punches him in the nuts until there's no tomorrow?
beef boi got an iron cased marble sack?
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 15:20
by jamesmcdonnell
bobcatbox wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021, 12:00
I respect Johnson but not enough to believe that in 2011 - at the time he fought and lost to Froch - that he would have posed much of a fight for Canelo. He lost three in a row after losing a close decision to Froch. Canelo would have smoked him.
I simply agree to disagree on Bute being a hard fight for Canelo.
While I do agree that the body of work is limited at 168, is there a doubt that if he stuck around and defended his undisputed title he would likely lose to anyone else? Benavidez gives him a good fight but Canelo enters that at least a 3:1 favorite.
I do not believe that, with the exception of Andre Ward, the 168 pound division was immensely better in 2009-13 than it is today. But I’m fine to disagree on that as well.
Let me put it this way perhaps. If Canelo had entered the Super Six tourney, is there a doubt he would have beaten everyone (or at the very least been an odds on favorite to beat everyone) except Ward?
And tbh, in my opinion, I think Canelo beats Ward in what would be a very good fight.
Ward would be a nightmare style for Canelo, he's like a bigger, rougher dirtier version of Floyd.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 20:03
by brilo33
apollo creed wrote: ↑11 Nov 2021, 06:33
brilo33 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2021, 19:44
Steven Metro wrote: ↑10 Nov 2021, 19:21
Canelo is a legitimate elite fighter, however, he has obviously benefitted from some dodgy decisions and cherry picking of opponents. His supposed win and draw over GGG, according to a majority of fans, polls, and non official judges should have been losses. Its also important to point out that he fought Golovkin when Golovkin was 37 years old, and had started to look vulnerable for the first time in his career in the Kell Brook fight. Canelo's team purposely timed the fights with GGG to once GGG reached late 30's and was starting to decline just a bit. Even fighting an older GGG, a majority of people thought Canelo lost both fights.
The same can be said of his fight VS Kovalev, fighting Kovalev when the Russian was late 30's and at least 3, possibly 5 years removed from his prime. I do think a Kovalev of 2012-15 would have KO'd Canelo personally but that's neither here nor there. In fairness to Canelo, its not a fair matchup to begin with if both were in their prime because Sergey is a much bigger man. I do feel today, Bivol or Beterbiev would defeat Canelo at 175.
Froch in his prime VS Canelo in his prime at 168, I gotta go with Froch personally, mainly on account of his size advantage he would carry into the fight. Wouldnt be a fair fight because of that. Hypothetically if it happened I could actually see Froch stopping Canelo late. Canelo hits harder but Froch was one of the roughest pressure fighters there was and I could see that pressure getting to the smaller man in late rounds. Arthur Abraham would be a winnable fight for Canelo I think. Mikkel Kessler would be a 50/50, I personally might lean a touch towards Canelo. Andre Ward I think would win a comfortable decision over Canelo at 168.
Once again tho, none of those are "fair fights" because Canelo is not a natural 168er.
yea but you have to give credit to canelo
in the 2nd fight for bringing it to triple g, un thinkable shows how versatile of a boxer saul is , i dont think height would be a big thing as usaly it comes with naturally being heavier which i dont think carl would have over saul, also i doubt carl would be fighting at range like plant , i think carl would have to go center of the ring and hold it ,he is very capable froch of winning, but at this time i go saul i think wins, 2 years down the line we might see what the weakness of saul is and then in a furture history fight froch will know his weakness
A
37 y/o GGG vs a
27-28 y/o Canelo and G still gave Canelo fists.
G was old and past of his prime.
Prime Cobra would be a big problem for the smaller Canelo @168. S6 Ward, Dirrell and Kessler too.
Canelo would beat Bika, Abraham, Taylor, Green and Bute.
what was tripple gs prime age though, thats a tough call as well he bashed macklin and Geale but they never fought back to give us enuff info though mack did well against martinze geale beat strum
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 20 Nov 2021, 00:46
by jezzamundo
brilo33 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021, 20:03
apollo creed wrote: ↑11 Nov 2021, 06:33
brilo33 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2021, 19:44
yea but you have to give credit to canelo
in the 2nd fight for bringing it to triple g, un thinkable shows how versatile of a boxer saul is , i dont think height would be a big thing as usaly it comes with naturally being heavier which i dont think carl would have over saul, also i doubt carl would be fighting at range like plant , i think carl would have to go center of the ring and hold it ,he is very capable froch of winning, but at this time i go saul i think wins, 2 years down the line we might see what the weakness of saul is and then in a furture history fight froch will know his weakness
A
37 y/o GGG vs a
27-28 y/o Canelo and G still gave Canelo fists.
G was old and past of his prime.
Prime Cobra would be a big problem for the smaller Canelo @168. S6 Ward, Dirrell and Kessler too.
Canelo would beat Bika, Abraham, Taylor, Green and Bute.
what was tripple gs prime age though, thats a tough call as well he bashed macklin and Geale but they never fought back to give us enuff info though mack did well against martinze geale beat strum
Excellent post Steve Metro - I disagree with nothing there, although I scored GGG-Canelo 2 a draw.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 20 Nov 2021, 03:09
by apollo creed
brilo33 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021, 20:03
apollo creed wrote: ↑11 Nov 2021, 06:33
brilo33 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2021, 19:44
yea but you have to give credit to canelo
in the 2nd fight for bringing it to triple g, un thinkable shows how versatile of a boxer saul is , i dont think height would be a big thing as usaly it comes with naturally being heavier which i dont think carl would have over saul, also i doubt carl would be fighting at range like plant , i think carl would have to go center of the ring and hold it ,he is very capable froch of winning, but at this time i go saul i think wins, 2 years down the line we might see what the weakness of saul is and then in a furture history fight froch will know his weakness
A
37 y/o GGG vs a
27-28 y/o Canelo and G still gave Canelo fists.
G was old and past of his prime.
Prime Cobra would be a big problem for the smaller Canelo @168. S6 Ward, Dirrell and Kessler too.
Canelo would beat Bika, Abraham, Taylor, Green and Bute.
what was tripple gs prime age though, thats a tough call as well he bashed macklin and Geale but they never fought back to give us enuff info though mack did well against martinze geale beat strum
Probably 2012-2015. But the top fighters like Martinez , JCCJr and Cotto were avoiding him.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 01:29
by 583829
Yeah, right ... Like he would be too much for Golovkin. Didn't dare to prove that.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 25 Nov 2021, 19:33
by brilo33
apollo creed wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021, 03:09
brilo33 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021, 20:03
apollo creed wrote: ↑11 Nov 2021, 06:33
A
37 y/o GGG vs a
27-28 y/o Canelo and G still gave Canelo fists.
G was old and past of his prime.
Prime Cobra would be a big problem for the smaller Canelo @168. S6 Ward, Dirrell and Kessler too.
Canelo would beat Bika, Abraham, Taylor, Green and Bute.
what was tripple gs prime age though, thats a tough call as well he bashed macklin and Geale but they never fought back to give us enuff info though mack did well against martinze geale beat strum
Probably 2012-2015. But the top fighters like Martinez , JCCJr and Cotto were avoiding him.
yea also Felix Sturm , so the ko of Gabriel Rosado era , i think his first fight with saul was the best ggg ive seen
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 26 Nov 2021, 07:17
by apollo creed
brilo33 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021, 19:33
apollo creed wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021, 03:09
brilo33 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021, 20:03
what was tripple gs prime age though, thats a tough call as well he bashed macklin and Geale but they never fought back to give us enuff info though mack did well against martinze geale beat strum
Probably 2012-2015. But the top fighters like Martinez , JCCJr and Cotto were avoiding him.
yea also Felix Sturm , so the ko of Gabriel Rosado era , i think his first fight with saul was
the best ggg ive seen
Well, thats true. Even in the second fight vs Canelo, G was good for a 36 y/o fighter.
Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."
Posted: 26 Nov 2021, 15:48
by dan28uk
I think some people on here are underestimating Canelo’s 168 wins against Callum smith was a good win and bjs win was great Caleb plant could go on and win titles again that would make canelos Win better although I did think he’d get him out of there 6-9 .as of froch he didn’t know when he was beaten and was tough as old boots and I think his best performances were Abraham and the bute fights but he did just get by in some wins like dirrell and Taylor ,at sm his are better than Alvarez but like others have said it was a better period than , ward would of outboxed Canelo , groves would have been stopped mid/late and Kessler Would have been beaten closely I feel
I think froch could of given canelo a serious fight but favour canelo 115-113