BoxRec

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 08:19**

Clarke looks young in the face. I think he'll find his level long before his age becomes a factor.

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 08:53**

Can anyone see any upsets for the home fighters ? All look nailed on but must be a chance to make a quid on someone

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 09:17**

i hope so, but he's 31 later this year and even a baby face (even got the bald baby head---he really does look like a big baby lol) is only peak for so long. this crappy debut fight in the scheme of things wont make a difference really, i just hope going forward he is matched ambitiously.

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 09:56**

tony1234 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 08:53 Can anyone see any upsets for the home fighters ? All look nailed on but must be a chance to make a quid on someone

Jonas.

Jonas has lost to Obaneuf and is going up a few weight classes.

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 10:44**

610567 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 10:20
tony1234 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 08:53 Can anyone see any upsets for the home fighters ? All look nailed on but must be a chance to make a quid on someone
No. worst undercard for a ppv event ever

But fighters like Hassan Azim are packing glass jaws so you never know

Do you hold Usyks loss to Shaun Crawford against him as well?

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 10:49**

mickey1975 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 10:44
610567 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 10:20
tony1234 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 08:53 Can anyone see any upsets for the home fighters ? All look nailed on but must be a chance to make a quid on someone
No. worst undercard for a ppv event ever

But fighters like Hassan Azim are packing glass jaws so you never know

Do you hold Usyks loss to Shaun Crawford against him as well?

You mean Shawn Porter, right?

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 10:59**

Yeah, it's not great.

Another thing stopping me paying up the £20 fee.

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 11:27**

589555 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 10:49
mickey1975 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 10:44
610567 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 10:20

No. worst undercard for a ppv event ever

But fighters like Hassan Azim are packing glass jaws so you never know

Do you hold Usyks loss to Shaun Crawford against him as well?
You mean Shawn Porter, right?

Yes.

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 11:47**

Clarke fight seems like a bit of a joke. Why didnt they find someone months ago and give them chance for a camp?

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 16:43**

If it ends like Warington-Lara II a good undercard would lessen the blow.

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 16:48**

Cholo_cws wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:43 If it ends like Warington-Lara II a good undercard would lessen the blow.

You can see something controversial coming .

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 16:54**

I nearly bought but was strong and won’t!

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 17:06**

Dioufy wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:54 I nearly bought but was strong and won’t!

From what I've seen it's been uncompetitive and awful so far .
Spending more time on here tells you all you need to know .

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 17:07**

rd350lc wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 17:06
Dioufy wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:54 I nearly bought but was strong and won’t!
From what I've seen it's been uncompetitive and awful so far .
Spending more time on here tells you all you need to know .

I did go to Warrington v Lara II and that main event has scarred me.
Top undercard there though that eased the 3hr car journey home.

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 17:09**

rd350lc wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:48
Cholo_cws wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:43 If it ends like Warington-Lara II a good undercard would lessen the blow.
You can see something controversial coming .

Strange the odds on a draw seem unusually low, especially as the bookies favour the fight to end inside the distance. Talk of a rematch seemed to spring up more this week. Maybe there'll be another Crawford-Khan ending

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 17:20**

Ok
Can someone sort me out for reliable stream?
Cheers

Posted: **19 Feb 2022, 18:19**

Wow this was so bad. An experienced international heavyweight beating up a fat guy who had never had an amateur or pro fight. Then a fat bird moving up three weights to win a world title against someone who hadn’t had a win in three years. Wow. We are witnessing history here guys. We will talk about this night to our grandkids….

Posted: **20 Feb 2022, 08:01**

JamesPhilips wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 18:19 Wow this was so bad. An experienced international heavyweight beating up a fat guy who had never had an amateur or pro fight. Then a fat bird moving up three weights to win a world title against someone who hadn’t had a win in three years. Wow. We are witnessing history here guys. We will talk about this night to our grandkids….

The Jonas fight just seemed like the biggest set up in history.

Anything just to get her a world title.

Seemed like a very desperate move.

I like Jonas, I really do and i was happy for her. But just the hype behind it, gets on my tits.

BoxRec

Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard