Ha ha ha.The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:41 Did someone say 'Nigel Farage' 3 times to get Shallowland to appear?![]()
Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
-
Callowland
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 408
- Joined: 30 Sep 2011, 17:56
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
He didn’t know whether it was a poem or a speech and he also didn’t know who wrote it. He was seemingly given it to read by someone else and didn’t bring it himself. If he thought it may be a poem and didn’t know who wrote it then it makes me think he didn’t know what was in it.Callowland wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:44At best, shouldn't he have checked and vetted what he was reading well in advance, and made a considered decision to withdraw from any participation in it, as it clearly in my opinion makes reference to segregation. I contend there's a strong possibility that he had a discussion about it well in advance, knew what he was going to read, and did it because he may have agreed with it. I can't believe that he turned up and read it off the cuff. That wouldn't make any sense.maverick23 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:32At the start of the speech AJ made clear whose letter/speech he was reading. If those words had been his own then perhaps I’d have thought differently but they weren’t. It was probably the first time he’d even read those words.Callowland wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:21
I don't disagree Fury made comments to which got him into trouble. That's fact and there was media outrage at the time.
Of course your interpretation of Joshua's comments are liberal. I take a different view because part of that speech in my opinion had a 1930's feel to it, asking people to abstain from spending money in 'their' shops and economies and invest in Black owned businesses. That to most people is a fairly highly charged segregationist statement. Joshua is a very well known celebrity and should have known better. If Fury had said to deliberately avoid Black and Asian businesses do you really think he would get off scot free. I think he would have been prosecuted and imprisoned.
I am comfortable with my interpretation of that speech.
I’d fee exactly the same if Fury had said those words if they weren’t his and he was referencing non-Gypsies.
He spoke his own words before going into the speech and I think spoke fairly well saying that it wasn’t black vs white etc and thanking non-Afro Caribbean people for their support.
Should he have read it before speaking those words publicly. Of course not and I’m sure he won’t do that again.
-
Callowland
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 408
- Joined: 30 Sep 2011, 17:56
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Probably a lesson learnt in hindsight.maverick23 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:59He didn’t know whether it was a poem or a speech and he also didn’t know who wrote it. He was seemingly given it to read by someone else and didn’t bring it himself. If he thought it may be a poem and didn’t know who wrote it then it makes me think he didn’t know what was in it.Callowland wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:44At best, shouldn't he have checked and vetted what he was reading well in advance, and made a considered decision to withdraw from any participation in it, as it clearly in my opinion makes reference to segregation. I contend there's a strong possibility that he had a discussion about it well in advance, knew what he was going to read, and did it because he may have agreed with it. I can't believe that he turned up and read it off the cuff. That wouldn't make any sense.maverick23 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:32
At the start of the speech AJ made clear whose letter/speech he was reading. If those words had been his own then perhaps I’d have thought differently but they weren’t. It was probably the first time he’d even read those words.
I’d fee exactly the same if Fury had said those words if they weren’t his and he was referencing non-Gypsies.
He spoke his own words before going into the speech and I think spoke fairly well saying that it wasn’t black vs white etc and thanking non-Afro Caribbean people for their support.
Should he have read it before speaking those words publicly. Of course not and I’m sure he won’t do that again.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Definitely. When I first saw it (just the video of him reading the speech) I thought it was bad in the same way you probably did but the extended video shows it was probably more him being really naive rather than him having a vendetta against white people.Callowland wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 13:07Probably a lesson learnt in hindsight.maverick23 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:59He didn’t know whether it was a poem or a speech and he also didn’t know who wrote it. He was seemingly given it to read by someone else and didn’t bring it himself. If he thought it may be a poem and didn’t know who wrote it then it makes me think he didn’t know what was in it.Callowland wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:44
At best, shouldn't he have checked and vetted what he was reading well in advance, and made a considered decision to withdraw from any participation in it, as it clearly in my opinion makes reference to segregation. I contend there's a strong possibility that he had a discussion about it well in advance, knew what he was going to read, and did it because he may have agreed with it. I can't believe that he turned up and read it off the cuff. That wouldn't make any sense.
He spoke his own words before going into the speech and I think spoke fairly well saying that it wasn’t black vs white etc and thanking non-Afro Caribbean people for their support.
Should he have read it before speaking those words publicly. Of course not and I’m sure he won’t do that again.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Oh here we go. Doofy, the 'boxing fan' who doesn't even post about big fights like Joyce v Zhang, or anything else boxing related, suddenly gets his willy out and starts smacking it around at the mere mention of Anthony Joshua. To think he tried to insinuate that others were attracted to AJ.
Dirty old man.
Dirty old man.
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 12:41 Did someone say 'Nigel Farage' 3 times to get Shallowland to appear?![]()
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9664
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
there are some odd people. it's not a fan club to not whine about someone making a comment years ago. I think some people like to try to point score about nothing.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
I'm glad I never made it as a famous painter. Fk me, the stupid shit I used to write in drunken txt messages years ago...urgh, what a complete dipshit! ![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
The troll becomes hysterical.The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 14:05 Oh here we go. Doofy, the 'boxing fan' who doesn't even post about big fights like Joyce v Zhang, or anything else boxing related, suddenly gets his willy out and starts smacking it around at the mere mention of Anthony Joshua. To think he tried to insinuate that others were attracted to AJ.![]()
Dirty old man.
Did Joshua’s comments on Mugabe and the “superior race” tip you over the edge?
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Theroux’s just done a programme with one who lives with his Mum and raps about guns.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
There you go again, proving my point...Joshua Joshua Joshua (with the occasional repetitive post about Usyk when reminded about Fury ducking him). To call someone else a troll when that is ALL you ever post about, now that's hypocritical and quite hysterical. You're a funny guy Doofy, in a not meaning to be funny way.BigDoofus wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:27The troll becomes hysterical.The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 14:05 Oh here we go. Doofy, the 'boxing fan' who doesn't even post about big fights like Joyce v Zhang, or anything else boxing related, suddenly gets his willy out and starts smacking it around at the mere mention of Anthony Joshua. To think he tried to insinuate that others were attracted to AJ.![]()
Dirty old man.
Did Joshua’s comments on Mugabe and the “superior race” tip you over the edge?
What's also quite hypocritical is you insinuating that some of the posters on here are attracted to AJ (I can admit he's a good looking guy, in a non gay way though), when you prance around the stage half naked, fawning, pawing and cuddling Iron Mike whilst looking like a regular from The Blue Oyster Bar.
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
I watched this last night - as expected it was a good interview.
Louis Theroux put Joshua on the spot with some very direct questions and criticisms. Such as him being gun-shy etc.
The only question I think Theroux missed was about Joshua's racist posts and remarks.
Overall I think Joshua came across very well (apart from his cringe rapping) He clearly has desire to regain the belts and the money seems an aside to this.
Louis Theroux put Joshua on the spot with some very direct questions and criticisms. Such as him being gun-shy etc.
The only question I think Theroux missed was about Joshua's racist posts and remarks.
Overall I think Joshua came across very well (apart from his cringe rapping) He clearly has desire to regain the belts and the money seems an aside to this.
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9664
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
be interesting to know if they were briefed not to ask certain questions. Seeing Louis though, he would ask them anyway. Remember him interviewing that crazy church guy, I thought he was going to be lynched, ditto the KKK people.
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Theroux is very good at getting people to open up. He uses lots of communication skills which probably go unnoticed. His use of silence is often perfectly done.
He would do a good interview with Tyson Fury. Theroux is clever enough to know deflections and bullsh1t, and experienced enough to keep on the right lines of conversation to get to the honest answers he wants .. for those reasons I'd imagine Fury would avoid the interview with Theroux as he would a WADA rep with a plastic bottle in his hand
He would do a good interview with Tyson Fury. Theroux is clever enough to know deflections and bullsh1t, and experienced enough to keep on the right lines of conversation to get to the honest answers he wants .. for those reasons I'd imagine Fury would avoid the interview with Theroux as he would a WADA rep with a plastic bottle in his hand
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9664
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
good point re the silences, as people nearly always felt compelled to fill the silence as there's something about silence that makes people feel uncomfortable.tonyevs wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 07:00 Theroux is very good at getting people to open up. He uses lots of communication skills which probably go unnoticed. His use of silence is often perfectly done.
He would do a good interview with Tyson Fury. Theroux is clever enough to know deflections and bullsh1t, and experienced enough to keep on the right lines of conversation to get to the honest answers he wants .. for those reasons I'd imagine Fury would avoid the interview with Theroux as he would a WADA rep with a plastic bottle in his hand
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Yes - most people feel awkward with silence and will feel easier speaking to avoid it. It's a proper skill to use silence correctly. Over done and without other active listening skills it can feel like intimidation. Theroux does it very well.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 07:18good point re the silences, as people nearly always felt compelled to fill the silence as there's something about silence that makes people feel uncomfortable.tonyevs wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 07:00 Theroux is very good at getting people to open up. He uses lots of communication skills which probably go unnoticed. His use of silence is often perfectly done.
He would do a good interview with Tyson Fury. Theroux is clever enough to know deflections and bullsh1t, and experienced enough to keep on the right lines of conversation to get to the honest answers he wants .. for those reasons I'd imagine Fury would avoid the interview with Theroux as he would a WADA rep with a plastic bottle in his hand
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
The Gratest troll spends his day posting laughing emojis.The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:40There you go again, proving my point...Joshua Joshua Joshua (with the occasional repetitive post about Usyk when reminded about Fury ducking him). To call someone else a troll when that is ALL you ever post about, now that's hypocritical and quite hysterical. You're a funny guy Doofy, in a not meaning to be funny way.BigDoofus wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:27The troll becomes hysterical.The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 14:05 Oh here we go. Doofy, the 'boxing fan' who doesn't even post about big fights like Joyce v Zhang, or anything else boxing related, suddenly gets his willy out and starts smacking it around at the mere mention of Anthony Joshua. To think he tried to insinuate that others were attracted to AJ.![]()
Dirty old man.
Did Joshua’s comments on Mugabe and the “superior race” tip you over the edge?
What's also quite hypocritical is you insinuating that some of the posters on here are attracted to AJ (I can admit he's a good looking guy, in a non gay way though), when you prance around the stage half naked, fawning, pawing and cuddling Iron Mike whilst looking like a regular from The Blue Oyster Bar.
Somebody posts links to his favourite pin-up boy's comments on race and Robert Mugabe and he has a meltdown.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Why don't you post something about boxing rather than repetitive posts about Joshua or Usyk?BigDoofus wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 08:28The Gratest troll spends his day posting laughing emojis.The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:40There you go again, proving my point...Joshua Joshua Joshua (with the occasional repetitive post about Usyk when reminded about Fury ducking him). To call someone else a troll when that is ALL you ever post about, now that's hypocritical and quite hysterical. You're a funny guy Doofy, in a not meaning to be funny way.
What's also quite hypocritical is you insinuating that some of the posters on here are attracted to AJ (I can admit he's a good looking guy, in a non gay way though), when you prance around the stage half naked, fawning, pawing and cuddling Iron Mike whilst looking like a regular from The Blue Oyster Bar.
Somebody posts links to his favourite pin-up boy's comments on race and Robert Mugabe and he has a meltdown.
You're the biggest troll on here Doofy
Now off you scuttle to the Blue Oyster Bar.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Can we get back on topic now please?
I haven't watched the interview yet but intend to.
I haven't watched the interview yet but intend to.
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
I asked him to discuss Japanese light flyweights, but he declined.The Gratest wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 09:05Why don't you post something about boxing rather than repetitive posts about Joshua or Usyk?BigDoofus wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 08:28The Gratest troll spends his day posting laughing emojis.The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:40
There you go again, proving my point...Joshua Joshua Joshua (with the occasional repetitive post about Usyk when reminded about Fury ducking him). To call someone else a troll when that is ALL you ever post about, now that's hypocritical and quite hysterical. You're a funny guy Doofy, in a not meaning to be funny way.
What's also quite hypocritical is you insinuating that some of the posters on here are attracted to AJ (I can admit he's a good looking guy, in a non gay way though), when you prance around the stage half naked, fawning, pawing and cuddling Iron Mike whilst looking like a regular from The Blue Oyster Bar.
Somebody posts links to his favourite pin-up boy's comments on race and Robert Mugabe and he has a meltdown.
You're the biggest troll on here Doofy![]()
Now off you scuttle to the Blue Oyster Bar.
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9664
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
My wife uses it well. I just lob a preemptive sorry in to cover the base.tonyevs wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 07:33Yes - most people feel awkward with silence and will feel easier speaking to avoid it. It's a proper skill to use silence correctly. Over done and without other active listening skills it can feel like intimidation. Theroux does it very well.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 07:18good point re the silences, as people nearly always felt compelled to fill the silence as there's something about silence that makes people feel uncomfortable.tonyevs wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 07:00 Theroux is very good at getting people to open up. He uses lots of communication skills which probably go unnoticed. His use of silence is often perfectly done.
He would do a good interview with Tyson Fury. Theroux is clever enough to know deflections and bullsh1t, and experienced enough to keep on the right lines of conversation to get to the honest answers he wants .. for those reasons I'd imagine Fury would avoid the interview with Theroux as he would a WADA rep with a plastic bottle in his hand
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Does she not get fed up getting woken up at 3am mate?SeanBrennan wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 16:35My wife uses it well. I just lob a preemptive sorry in to cover the base.tonyevs wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 07:33Yes - most people feel awkward with silence and will feel easier speaking to avoid it. It's a proper skill to use silence correctly. Over done and without other active listening skills it can feel like intimidation. Theroux does it very well.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 07:18
good point re the silences, as people nearly always felt compelled to fill the silence as there's something about silence that makes people feel uncomfortable.
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9664
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
We have 5 cats and a 12 year old daughter, we're woken up regularly with one of them whining so it's all good. And my CPAP machine ensures she never really gets a decent sleep.The Gratest wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 16:40Does she not get fed up getting woken up at 3am mate?SeanBrennan wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 16:35My wife uses it well. I just lob a preemptive sorry in to cover the base.
I spoil her.