Do you think it is acceptable to claim it from a fighter’s purse?
It would depend on what exactly is the fighters purse.
Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
It isn't but is that what happened? Did someone maybe do it by mistake? It's possible it could have been by mistake or Barry didn't know anything about it. That's two possibilities right there. It's not right but it's hardly a felony.
Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
you can't and if you try to it's a pants excuse.
Does Bob Monkhouse help you with your replies.
only since 2003
Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation
Posted: 04 Jan 2024, 17:36
by Cask
handsofstone wrote: ↑04 Jan 2024, 14:02
I remember before this all come out with Frampton most people had the upmost respect for all the McGuigan's but there was a few who had met Barry and said he wasn't what he seemed which from my view was a proper boxing man who cared about all fighters not his own, since then my view and more importantly his reputation has plummeted, stealing from someone you considered a son, doesn't get much lower
Think I've mentioned several hundred times on here that I'm named Barry purely because my dad was a fan and it was when he was in his pomp, not something I like to mention as much these days but I used to be quite chuffed, the truth will come out in the end I suppose, the guys a rat
Everybody knew McGuigan was an untrustworthy prick who says one thing for the cameras and another behind the scenes, what do you think the whole embarrassing Mr Eastwood thing was about?? Eastwood cleaned him in court, Harry took bad advice from his brother (tragically committed suicide over 30 years ago now I think)
handsofstone wrote: ↑04 Jan 2024, 14:02
I remember before this all come out with Frampton most people had the upmost respect for all the McGuigan's but there was a few who had met Barry and said he wasn't what he seemed which from my view was a proper boxing man who cared about all fighters not his own, since then my view and more importantly his reputation has plummeted, stealing from someone you considered a son, doesn't get much lower
Think I've mentioned several hundred times on here that I'm named Barry purely because my dad was a fan and it was when he was in his pomp, not something I like to mention as much these days but I used to be quite chuffed, the truth will come out in the end I suppose, the guys a rat
Everybody knew McGuigan was an untrustworthy prick who says one thing for the cameras and another behind the scenes, what do you think the whole embarrassing Mr Eastwood thing was about?? Eastwood cleaned him in court, Harry took bad advice from his brother (tragically committed suicide over 30 years ago now I think)
We need one for Frampton now
Thank you very much Mr.Kinahan!!
What advice did he take from his brother and where did you get that information from?
handsofstone wrote: ↑04 Jan 2024, 14:02
I remember before this all come out with Frampton most people had the upmost respect for all the McGuigan's but there was a few who had met Barry and said he wasn't what he seemed which from my view was a proper boxing man who cared about all fighters not his own, since then my view and more importantly his reputation has plummeted, stealing from someone you considered a son, doesn't get much lower
Think I've mentioned several hundred times on here that I'm named Barry purely because my dad was a fan and it was when he was in his pomp, not something I like to mention as much these days but I used to be quite chuffed, the truth will come out in the end I suppose, the guys a rat
Everybody knew McGuigan was an untrustworthy prick who says one thing for the cameras and another behind the scenes, what do you think the whole embarrassing Mr Eastwood thing was about?? Eastwood cleaned him in court, Harry took bad advice from his brother (tragically committed suicide over 30 years ago now I think)
We need one for Frampton now
Thank you very much Mr.Kinahan!!
What advice did he take from his brother and where did you get that information from?
Well aware of that but I'm asking you for your evidence that he was involved in the Eastwood case more than a substance less stock answer.
I think it would be "insensitive" to get into right here, but you'se fucked up more than once by now eh, slither back away under the rock
Fill your boots. Get right into it. You're the one that referenced it so let's hear it. You say you know something and I'm asking you to explain the details and where you got that information from but you seem to be side stepping. As for slithering under a rock. Not happening.
Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation
Posted: 04 Jan 2024, 18:38
by SeanBrennan
why don't we agree to disagree, it's only a forum.
Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation
Posted: 04 Jan 2024, 18:42
by 1303629
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑04 Jan 2024, 18:38
why don't we agree to disagree, it's only a forum.
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑04 Jan 2024, 18:38
why don't we agree to disagree, it's only a forum.
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
you're talking to the wrong person, check the thread. You can apologise after you have....
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑04 Jan 2024, 18:38
why don't we agree to disagree, it's only a forum.
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
you're talking to the wrong person, check the thread. You can apologise after you have....
Well why the hell are you chipping in with agree to disagree then?
1303629 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2024, 18:42
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
you're talking to the wrong person, check the thread. You can apologise after you have....
Well why the hell are you chipping in with agree to disagree then?
because it is a forum and any member can speak on it. I'll comment on what I like, don't get your Mrs Mcguigan's in a twist.