Page 4 of 4
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 30 Jan 2026, 18:11
by Coco
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 17:03
Spud MK2 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 23:03
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026, 18:07
I spent time with him last summer at the hotel he stayed at ahead of the Barnsley show where Simpson fought Chelli (pure coincidence, I was meeting my mother in law there as they were over from Oz), and he said he was done with promoting and was just managing fighters. No idea if that has changed now.
mick is working as an advisor for shalom
Ben is in good hands then Mick is a decent human being
But not a successful promoter!
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 30 Jan 2026, 18:14
by SeanBrennan
Coco wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 18:11
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 17:03
Spud MK2 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 23:03
mick is working as an advisor for shalom
Ben is in good hands then Mick is a decent human being
But not a successful promoter!
Always respect your opinion Coco I thought he did ok and was loyal, the likes of Froch and Tyson lacked that. Just my opinion.
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 30 Jan 2026, 19:03
by CaptainSpacerod
Is Mick ok healthwise ? Noticed him wearing sunglasses indoors at a couple of shows recently and he doesn’t come across as the kind of dafty who does that for show
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 10 Feb 2026, 21:18
by Spud MK2
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 18:14
Coco wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 18:11
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 17:03
Ben is in good hands then Mick is a decent human being
But not a successful promoter!
Always respect your opinion Coco I thought he did ok and was loyal, the likes of Froch and Tyson lacked that. Just my opinion.
mick is a top bloke …. i am convinced that if tyson fury hadn’t been CONTROVERSIALLY denied the David Haye fight … a victory would have shown even more mick could deliver the big fights amd more boxers would have signed with him.
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 14 Mar 2026, 04:14
by johnmanchester
Any news on the JW court case? Been awfully quiet.
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 14 Mar 2026, 07:09
by Twinkle Toes
It's going to be settled out of court in my opinion.
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 14 Mar 2026, 13:35
by SeanBrennan
Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑14 Mar 2026, 07:09
It's going to be settled out of court in my opinion.
I heard they're settling it on the cobbles, undercard of Froch-Fury
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 14 Mar 2026, 13:42
by skanksta
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑14 Mar 2026, 13:35
Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑14 Mar 2026, 07:09
It's going to be settled out of court in my opinion.
I heard they're settling it on the cobbles, undercard of Froch-Fury
Not after what Adam Smith did to The Cobra on the cobbles !

Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 14 Mar 2026, 14:02
by SeanBrennan
skanksta wrote: ↑14 Mar 2026, 13:42
SeanBrennan wrote: ↑14 Mar 2026, 13:35
Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑14 Mar 2026, 07:09
It's going to be settled out of court in my opinion.
I heard they're settling it on the cobbles, undercard of Froch-Fury
Not after what Adam Smith did to The Cobra on the cobbles !
good point, and GAD did him with a leg kick, he's 0 and 2 on the hard road
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 14 Mar 2026, 14:08
by skanksta
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 14 Mar 2026, 14:13
by SeanBrennan
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 14:53
by Spud MK2
Frostieballs wrote: ↑04 Jan 2026, 14:50
Come on Spud. Tell us what you know.
Who else was meant to be involved in Blue Wolf Sports?
👌
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 14:55
by Spud MK2
johnmanchester wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 07:40
Sky won't be making any settlements seeing as Sky isn't even involved in a court case.
I'd be interested to learn if any sides who are involved in the court case have been making offers to settle though.
Often quite instructive to see which side of a case is making offers to settle. Good indicator of how strong they feel their case is + their chances of winning in open court.
The whole discovery process should have been completed by now so both sides and the court have access to each other's evidence and relevant materials.
Also at this point there will have been a costs hearing /costs decision regarding who is liable to pay costs depending on outcome of case, and what % of costs may be recoverable. Gonna be expensive for Boxxer if the court hasn't awarded them 100% costs, that solicitors firm they're using is very pricey.
Maybe the resident boxxer spokesman on the forum can find out for us.
Either way, I'm sure we will see a resolution quite soon.
😉
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 14:56
by Spud MK2
Spud MK2 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 08:17
Spud MK2 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 08:12
johnmanchester wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 07:40
Sky won't be making any settlements seeing as Sky isn't even involved in a court case.
WRONG
😉
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 14:58
by Spud MK2
:bag:
Spud MK2 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 08:12
johnmanchester wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 07:40
Sky won't be making any settlements seeing as Sky isn't even involved in a court case.
I'd be interested to learn if any sides who are involved in the court case have been making offers to settle though.
Often quite instructive to see which side of a case is making offers to settle. Good indicator of how strong they feel their case is + their chances of winning in open court.
The whole discovery process should have been completed by now so both sides and the court have access to each other's evidence and relevant materials.
Also at this point there will have been a costs hearing /costs decision regarding who is liable to pay costs depending on outcome of case, and what % of costs may be recoverable. Gonna be expensive for Boxxer if the court hasn't awarded them 100% costs, that solicitors firm they're using is very pricey.
Maybe the resident boxxer spokesman on the forum can find out for us.
Either way, I'm sure we will see a resolution quite soon.
You think you are being clever with the contents of this post.
you keep saying sky are not involved … are you sure??😉
you keep hinting that one side will not have the funds for the % of the costs … relax relax and relax😉
you hint at the resolution being near? i said march sky would return to boxing o the strict condition the case doesn’t bring up to many embarrassing points.
my reliable source tells me … one side should be waiting for the knock on the a very important delivery is due
Interesting
Re: Ed Robinson & John Whichusen
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 15:59
by johnmanchester
What are you babbling about now?
I can't even make sense of what you're posting because it seems like you quote-posted yourself then replied "Interesting" to your own post. It's a mess lol.
Anyway - at the time I posted "Sky aren't involved", Sky wasn't involved - they weren't listed as a defendant. So Sky was at that time quite literally not involved in the court case.
Now they are.
The rest of it, my opinion hasn't changed. They won't be settling anything and your "£15 million" figure is ridiculous.
That said... Sky did get added to the docket in the end, which you did predict in January.
Maybe you're the brains behind all this..? Are you like a consultant /1-1 advisory on this? Would explain all the multilayered strategy chess being played at the top level. Hidden hand. Veteran insider.