Page 4 of 6

Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 20:23
by Rory McCloskey
caught what?

Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 21:08
by RazorKO
evndrbsn wrote:
RazorKO wrote: I have exposed you as a Boxrec hunter.
"Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?"
I caught him saying this but denies it, and is now trying to shift the blame on whoever he can get his mitts on.

Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 21:10
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
RazorKO wrote:
evndrbsn wrote:
RazorKO wrote: I have exposed you as a Boxrec hunter.
"Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?"
I caught him saying this but denies it, and is now trying to shift the blame on whoever he can get his mitts on.

Dave Jaco TKO 7 Ruddock

Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 22:30
by evndrbsn
Rory McCloskey wrote:caught what?
RazorKO wrote: Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?
RazorKO believed one of our members to be Razor Ruddock and he tried to convince him to lose a bit of his clothes.

Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 22:39
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock

Posted: 27 Nov 2005, 00:21
by evndrbsn
BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock
Caught! To be crappy fighters.

Posted: 27 Nov 2005, 19:13
by RazorKO
evndrbsn wrote:
Rory McCloskey wrote:caught what?
RazorKO wrote: Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?
RazorKO believed one of our members to be Razor Ruddock and he tried to convince him to lose a bit of his clothes.
I see you are regretting having said the quote. I have exposed you, how do you feel?

Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 00:26
by evndrbsn
RazorKO wrote:
evndrbsn wrote:
Rory McCloskey wrote:caught what?
RazorKO wrote: Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?
RazorKO believed one of our members to be Razor Ruddock and he tried to convince him to lose a bit of his clothes.
I see you are regretting having said the quote. I have exposed you, how do you feel?
Why would I regret that you think Ruddock is chiseled? It is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

And really, stop. I'm flattered and all that you think so highly of me, but stop trying to draw me into your little rainbow sprinkled world. I'm just not that way. I like women and always have, nothing will change that.

Stick to what you have - I'm sure Ruddock and CoAtzee are good mates for you.

Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 06:09
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
all i have to say is......



dave jaco TKO 7 ruddock

Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 17:00
by RazorKO
evndrbsn wrote:
RazorKO wrote:
evndrbsn wrote: RazorKO believed one of our members to be Razor Ruddock and he tried to convince him to lose a bit of his clothes.
I see you are regretting having said the quote. I have exposed you, how do you feel?
Why would I regret that you think Ruddock is chiseled? It is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

And really, stop. I'm flattered and all that you think so highly of me, but stop trying to draw me into your little rainbow sprinkled world. I'm just not that way. I like women and always have, nothing will change that.

Stick to what you have - I'm sure Ruddock and CoAtzee are good mates for you.
I will say it AGAIN


How do you feel?

Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 17:48
by josh576
BB you're killing me with this Dave Jaco stuff

Razor actually lost to that glass-jawed tomato can

all together now....PATHETIC!

Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 19:50
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
josh576 wrote:BB you're killing me with this Dave Jaco stuff

Razor actually lost to that glass-jawed tomato can

all together now....PATHETIC!



can u imagine

dave jaco TKO 7 joe louis

Dave jaco TKO 7 rocky marciano



no that doesnt fit does it

Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 19:55
by Broncano
jesus, you guys still in this thread? :-?

Posted: 29 Nov 2005, 12:37
by evndrbsn
RazorKO wrote:
evndrbsn wrote:
RazorKO wrote: I see you are regretting having said the quote. I have exposed you, how do you feel?
Why would I regret that you think Ruddock is chiseled? It is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

And really, stop. I'm flattered and all that you think so highly of me, but stop trying to draw me into your little rainbow sprinkled world. I'm just not that way. I like women and always have, nothing will change that.

Stick to what you have - I'm sure Ruddock and CoAtzee are good mates for you.
I will say it AGAIN


How do you feel?
I TOLD you, I am not interested!

Posted: 10 Dec 2005, 11:28
by Cap
I will go to my grave believing that Ken Norton beat Larry Holmes. The corrupt powers of boxing at the time looked at the matchup and saw dollar signs if Holmes remained unbeaten, while Norton was on the downslide. Why have two fighters with losses when you can have a new heavyweight champ with a perfect record? That decision was bought and paid for and only a knockout would have gotten Norton a win.

Cap

Posted: 10 Dec 2005, 16:01
by Collins2000
BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock
Abe Simon KO6 Jersey Joe Walcott

Hahahahaha, Abe Freakin Simon!

No doubt you'll have a real good nut-hugging excuse for this, Brocky. Let me guess, it will be along the lines of "he wasn't in his prime so it doesn't matter"...

Tell me again about those posters you have on your bedroom wall that you fondle and talk to... That was classic.

:TU:

Posted: 10 Dec 2005, 17:43
by Collins2000
Cap wrote:I will go to my grave believing that Ken Norton beat Larry Holmes. The corrupt powers of boxing at the time looked at the matchup and saw dollar signs if Holmes remained unbeaten, while Norton was on the downslide. Why have two fighters with losses when you can have a new heavyweight champ with a perfect record? That decision was bought and paid for and only a knockout would have gotten Norton a win.

Cap
Cap, now I know there are a lot of conspracy theorists among boxing fans but this is a classic one, mate. Any shred of evidence to back your claim? Anything at all?

:o

Posted: 11 Dec 2005, 01:02
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
Collins2000 wrote:
BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock
Abe Simon KO6 Jersey Joe Walcott

Hahahahaha, Abe Freakin Simon!

No doubt you'll have a real good nut-hugging excuse for this, Brocky. Let me guess, it will be along the lines of "he wasn't in his prime so it doesn't matter"...

Tell me again about those posters you have on your bedroom wall that you fondle and talk to... That was classic.

:TU:

why would u say abe simon instead of al ettore? you just ruined your possible good comeback by saying abe simon instead of al ettore who also knocked out walcott.


i would rather be knocked out by the strong durabe simon than the wimpy dave jaco




so once again dave jaco TKO 7 ruddock still has u beat














Tell me again about those posters you have on your bedroom wall that you fondle and talk to... That was classic.


heres the poster I have up on my wall







http://www.expats.co.za/extra/images/me ... oetzee.jpg

and



http://www.onlinesports.com/images/ssg-lh-8d.gif



and





http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/ ... oonort.jpg

Holmes tko in 12th over louis

Posted: 11 Dec 2005, 04:10
by marchegiano007
Holmes was a much better fighter than walcott and conn and he was bigger than those little guys.

Posted: 11 Dec 2005, 10:40
by Cap
Collins2000 wrote:
Cap wrote:I will go to my grave believing that Ken Norton beat Larry Holmes. The corrupt powers of boxing at the time looked at the matchup and saw dollar signs if Holmes remained unbeaten, while Norton was on the downslide. Why have two fighters with losses when you can have a new heavyweight champ with a perfect record? That decision was bought and paid for and only a knockout would have gotten Norton a win.

Cap
Cap, now I know there are a lot of conspracy theorists among boxing fans but this is a classic one, mate. Any shred of evidence to back your claim? Anything at all?

:o
About as much as most conspiracy therorists. Just the evidence of my own eyes and subsequent events. It helps that we all know how corrupt boxing is and has been since the first prize fighter slipped on a pair of leather mitts. The big future money was with Holmes. And we're not talking thousands of dollars or pounds here, but millions and millions. More than enough vig to grease the right palms.

Cap

Re: Holmes tko in 12th over louis

Posted: 11 Dec 2005, 12:04
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
marchegiano007 wrote:Holmes was a much better fighter than walcott and conn and he was bigger than those little guys.
i agree, but walcott was the better ring technicician than holmes. then again, walcott was one of the best heavyweight ring technicians in heavyweight history.



and walcott is not little, hes a jacked 6' 197lb. holmes is only 13lb heavier. so i doubt u ever seen a picture of walcott if u call him a little guy!

Posted: 11 Dec 2005, 14:48
by Collins2000
Brocky says "i would rather be knocked out by the strong durabe simon than the wimpy dave jaco"...

Yes, but I'm not saying Ruddock was anything special. Yet you are on here 4 times a day ranting on about how Walcott was some sort of superman.

Abe Freakin Simon! Hahahahaha. That's classic.

What's that thing you say to your poster of Marciano? Wasn't it something totally weird like "Be with me today"?



:TU:

Posted: 11 Dec 2005, 15:46
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
Yes, but I'm not saying Ruddock was anything special. Yet you are on here 4 times a day ranting on about how Walcott was some sort of superman.

i rate walcott in my top 15 heavyweights, how is that a superhuman??




i simply say in terms of boxing skills wise, walcott was one of the best ring techncians in the heavyweight division of all time which is the truth.


i never said he could beat foreman,holmes ,tyson. i was simply talkking about how remarkable his cutie tricks looked on film and how much skill he had at his peak.









abe simon was very ugly









collins,



i simply joke on poster "razor" , thats why i use the jaco-ruddock thing.



its clear to both me and you walcott and ruddock lost to simon and jaco FAR BEFORE THERE PRIMES and when they were lighter.

Posted: 11 Dec 2005, 16:57
by Collins2000
BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
Yes, but I'm not saying Ruddock was anything special. Yet you are on here 4 times a day ranting on about how Walcott was some sort of superman.

i rate walcott in my top 15 heavyweights, how is that a superhuman??




i simply say in terms of boxing skills wise, walcott was one of the best ring techncians in the heavyweight division of all time which is the truth.


i never said he could beat foreman,holmes ,tyson. i was simply talkking about how remarkable his cutie tricks looked on film and how much skill he had at his peak.









abe simon was very ugly









collins,



i simply joke on poster "razor" , thats why i use the jaco-ruddock thing.



its clear to both me and you walcott and ruddock lost to simon and jaco FAR BEFORE THERE PRIMES and when they were lighter.

Brocky,

You ever seen that interview with Henry Cooper where he is talking about how him and Wicks used to go through a list of heavies and work out who would make a good opponent for Henry?

If Wicks thought the opponent was too dangerous for Cooper, he wouldn't actually say that. He'd just say "No, he's too ugly".

I thought that was amusing.

:o

Posted: 11 Dec 2005, 17:31
by RazorKO
Collins2000 wrote:
BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock
Abe Simon KO6 Jersey Joe Walcott

Hahahahaha, Abe Freakin Simon!

No doubt you'll have a real good nut-hugging excuse for this, Brocky. Let me guess, it will be along the lines of "he wasn't in his prime so it doesn't matter"...

Tell me again about those posters you have on your bedroom wall that you fondle and talk to... That was classic.

:TU:
Very true Collins. He likes to make fun of Ruddock being stopped by Jaco despite Ruddock suffering an asthma attack in the middle of the ring and he likes to make fun of Coetzee where he was floored early in his career. But Walcott was starched by fat Abe Simon!