Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 20:23
caught what?
I caught him saying this but denies it, and is now trying to shift the blame on whoever he can get his mitts on.evndrbsn wrote:"Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?"RazorKO wrote: I have exposed you as a Boxrec hunter.
RazorKO wrote:I caught him saying this but denies it, and is now trying to shift the blame on whoever he can get his mitts on.evndrbsn wrote:"Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?"RazorKO wrote: I have exposed you as a Boxrec hunter.
Rory McCloskey wrote:caught what?
RazorKO believed one of our members to be Razor Ruddock and he tried to convince him to lose a bit of his clothes.RazorKO wrote: Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?
Caught! To be crappy fighters.BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock
I see you are regretting having said the quote. I have exposed you, how do you feel?evndrbsn wrote:Rory McCloskey wrote:caught what?RazorKO believed one of our members to be Razor Ruddock and he tried to convince him to lose a bit of his clothes.RazorKO wrote: Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?
Why would I regret that you think Ruddock is chiseled? It is your opinion and you are entitled to it.RazorKO wrote:I see you are regretting having said the quote. I have exposed you, how do you feel?evndrbsn wrote:Rory McCloskey wrote:caught what?RazorKO believed one of our members to be Razor Ruddock and he tried to convince him to lose a bit of his clothes.RazorKO wrote: Ooooh Ruddock, you are so chiseled. Can you take your shirt off for me again?
I will say it AGAINevndrbsn wrote:Why would I regret that you think Ruddock is chiseled? It is your opinion and you are entitled to it.RazorKO wrote:I see you are regretting having said the quote. I have exposed you, how do you feel?evndrbsn wrote: RazorKO believed one of our members to be Razor Ruddock and he tried to convince him to lose a bit of his clothes.
And really, stop. I'm flattered and all that you think so highly of me, but stop trying to draw me into your little rainbow sprinkled world. I'm just not that way. I like women and always have, nothing will change that.
Stick to what you have - I'm sure Ruddock and CoAtzee are good mates for you.
josh576 wrote:BB you're killing me with this Dave Jaco stuff
Razor actually lost to that glass-jawed tomato can
all together now....PATHETIC!
I TOLD you, I am not interested!RazorKO wrote:I will say it AGAINevndrbsn wrote:Why would I regret that you think Ruddock is chiseled? It is your opinion and you are entitled to it.RazorKO wrote: I see you are regretting having said the quote. I have exposed you, how do you feel?
And really, stop. I'm flattered and all that you think so highly of me, but stop trying to draw me into your little rainbow sprinkled world. I'm just not that way. I like women and always have, nothing will change that.
Stick to what you have - I'm sure Ruddock and CoAtzee are good mates for you.
How do you feel?
Abe Simon KO6 Jersey Joe WalcottBrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock
Cap, now I know there are a lot of conspracy theorists among boxing fans but this is a classic one, mate. Any shred of evidence to back your claim? Anything at all?Cap wrote:I will go to my grave believing that Ken Norton beat Larry Holmes. The corrupt powers of boxing at the time looked at the matchup and saw dollar signs if Holmes remained unbeaten, while Norton was on the downslide. Why have two fighters with losses when you can have a new heavyweight champ with a perfect record? That decision was bought and paid for and only a knockout would have gotten Norton a win.
Cap
Collins2000 wrote:Abe Simon KO6 Jersey Joe WalcottBrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock
Hahahahaha, Abe Freakin Simon!
No doubt you'll have a real good nut-hugging excuse for this, Brocky. Let me guess, it will be along the lines of "he wasn't in his prime so it doesn't matter"...
Tell me again about those posters you have on your bedroom wall that you fondle and talk to... That was classic.
Tell me again about those posters you have on your bedroom wall that you fondle and talk to... That was classic.
About as much as most conspiracy therorists. Just the evidence of my own eyes and subsequent events. It helps that we all know how corrupt boxing is and has been since the first prize fighter slipped on a pair of leather mitts. The big future money was with Holmes. And we're not talking thousands of dollars or pounds here, but millions and millions. More than enough vig to grease the right palms.Collins2000 wrote:Cap, now I know there are a lot of conspracy theorists among boxing fans but this is a classic one, mate. Any shred of evidence to back your claim? Anything at all?Cap wrote:I will go to my grave believing that Ken Norton beat Larry Holmes. The corrupt powers of boxing at the time looked at the matchup and saw dollar signs if Holmes remained unbeaten, while Norton was on the downslide. Why have two fighters with losses when you can have a new heavyweight champ with a perfect record? That decision was bought and paid for and only a knockout would have gotten Norton a win.
Cap
i agree, but walcott was the better ring technicician than holmes. then again, walcott was one of the best heavyweight ring technicians in heavyweight history.marchegiano007 wrote:Holmes was a much better fighter than walcott and conn and he was bigger than those little guys.
Yes, but I'm not saying Ruddock was anything special. Yet you are on here 4 times a day ranting on about how Walcott was some sort of superman.
BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Yes, but I'm not saying Ruddock was anything special. Yet you are on here 4 times a day ranting on about how Walcott was some sort of superman.
i rate walcott in my top 15 heavyweights, how is that a superhuman??
i simply say in terms of boxing skills wise, walcott was one of the best ring techncians in the heavyweight division of all time which is the truth.
i never said he could beat foreman,holmes ,tyson. i was simply talkking about how remarkable his cutie tricks looked on film and how much skill he had at his peak.
abe simon was very ugly
collins,
i simply joke on poster "razor" , thats why i use the jaco-ruddock thing.
its clear to both me and you walcott and ruddock lost to simon and jaco FAR BEFORE THERE PRIMES and when they were lighter.
Very true Collins. He likes to make fun of Ruddock being stopped by Jaco despite Ruddock suffering an asthma attack in the middle of the ring and he likes to make fun of Coetzee where he was floored early in his career. But Walcott was starched by fat Abe Simon!Collins2000 wrote:Abe Simon KO6 Jersey Joe WalcottBrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:Frank Bruno KO 1 Gerrie Coatzee
Dave Jaco TKO 7 Razor Ruddock
Hahahahaha, Abe Freakin Simon!
No doubt you'll have a real good nut-hugging excuse for this, Brocky. Let me guess, it will be along the lines of "he wasn't in his prime so it doesn't matter"...
Tell me again about those posters you have on your bedroom wall that you fondle and talk to... That was classic.