Page 4 of 4
Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 21:48
by Tarquin Tarpaulin IV
Good scrap but Matts uppercuts looked suspiciously like inside of the glove and they don'e score.
Williams for me but a draw wouldn't have seen me complaining!
Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 22:14
by Max Molyneux
I wonder how the fornicate Toney can get away with being a fat bastard but the proper heavies can't!
Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 22:20
by Neri
Max Molyneux wrote:I wonder how the smeg Toney can get away with being a fat bastard but the proper heavies can't!
Steroids?
Posted: 26 Feb 2006, 01:25
by johnswan1
lvlarc_uk wrote:My T Sharp wrote:lvlarc_uk wrote:Fai result I think. Top stuff
WTF I thought they gave it to Skelton
I typed Skelton when I heard 116-113
Valuev will give Danny a good hiding
I actually thought they announced Skelton as winner, hearing must of went for a second
Must 'have', not must 'of', you knobhead.
Posted: 26 Feb 2006, 01:26
by johnswan1
Posted: 26 Feb 2006, 01:27
by johnswan1
Max Molyneux wrote:Should of been 10 - 8 to Danny My T sharp in the 12th.
How the hell can you say the ref was disgraceful? He was very generous to Skelton.
Yeah I agree a rematch would be good and it deserves one.
Should 'have' not should 'of', you knobhead.
Posted: 26 Feb 2006, 01:34
by Cannibal
johnswan1 wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Should of been 10 - 8 to Danny My T sharp in the 12th.
How the hell can you say the ref was disgraceful? He was very generous to Skelton.
Yeah I agree a rematch would be good and it deserves one.
Should 'have' not should 'of', you knobhead.
What are you? The grammar police? It's a boxing forum not a grammar rodeo.
Posted: 26 Feb 2006, 04:22
by Razor
All i have to say what way did williams win the fight? In none if you ask me, Skelton stook to his gameplan which was to get into his head and fornicate him up which seemed to work, Danny seemed like a scared kid who was fighting for his life. Skelton would have more a chance against Valuev because Valuev will be thinkin wtf is this boxing or K1. Matt's style is awkward because hes used to that in K1 but its also clever, he's using the grappling skills from k1 in his boxing, which we all seen last night. Im pissed of cause Valuev will just scare Danny to a TKO 5
Posted: 26 Feb 2006, 07:20
by Neri
johnswan1 wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Should of been 10 - 8 to Danny My T sharp in the 12th.
How the hell can you say the ref was disgraceful? He was very generous to Skelton.
Yeah I agree a rematch would be good and it deserves one.
Should 'have' not should 'of', you knobhead.
Who cares ? I could still understand what they where saying.
Posted: 26 Feb 2006, 19:14
by Max Molyneux
johnswan1 wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Should of been 10 - 8 to Danny My T sharp in the 12th.
How the hell can you say the ref was disgraceful? He was very generous to Skelton.
Yeah I agree a rematch would be good and it deserves one.
Should 'have' not should 'of', you knobhead.
Errrm it's either and never quote me on grammer.