Posted: 31 May 2006, 03:10
after the first fight, i guess anything would've been a bit disappointing. i too got the sense that while dlh was boxing neatly in the rematch, that he was just deferring the moments that mosley would come in & get him with the better, harder shots. these kind of fights - skill/workrate vs cleaner punching - always coax different interpretations (like the first 2 toney-mccallums, which incidentally were fought at a much higher level of skill) & are so often won down the stretch. mosley def closed the better & have have no prooblem with his winvagabundo55 wrote:I understand what you mean. It wasn't a particularly good performance by them. A bit like Margarito vs Santos in that neither fighter looked exceptionally impressive.Decagon wrote:I scored it for Mosley. Overall, watching the fight, I had the feeling that De la Hoya won, but on a round-by-round basis, I had Mosley clearly ahead. For too many rounds, Oscar was just throwing that pitty-pat jab, using it for range, rather than trying to hurt Mosley. Neither man did particularly much in that fight, and I wouldn't consider it a great performance for either man. It was almost like De la Hoya was fighting to Compubox and the HBO commentators. Heck, that's what a smart fighter does, and that easily could have given him the fight, but Mosley was in there to do damage, and that's what got him the fight on my card.