Page 4 of 4
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 13:36
by b_hammersley
I'll tell you why Daws should be worried from Muttley, cause Muttley would be far too strong for him! He showed me a lot in that fight, great fighter just got beaten by a better one. Muttley would be far too much for Daws, can't ever see them taking that fight, the first big hook would finish Daws.
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 13:44
by Jacko11
b_hammersley wrote:I'll tell you why Daws should be worried from Muttley, cause Muttley would be far too strong for him! He showed me a lot in that fight, great fighter just got beaten by a better one. Muttley would be far too much for Daws, can't ever see them taking that fight, the first big hook would finish Daws.
Ando impressed me last night showed WHY you should NEVER give up, but i disagree Hammersly...Mutley was the better boxer by far ... Kev had the better engine on the night...dont forget it was ONE punch that finished it really

Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 14:30
by spud66
One punch that started it but there were a few pretty hurtful punches after that

Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 14:37
by kerrminator
After watching the fight again today sobre I scored it
Mutley-Anderson
1- 10-10
2- 10-8
3- 9-10
4- 10-9
5- 10-9
6- 10-9
7- 10-10
8- 9-10
9- 9-10
10- 8-10
95-95
and if Mutt got up from the knockdown Kev was clearly going to get in the tenth I could honestly see Kev taking the last two rounds and winning on points which would be a grand total of 113-115
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 15:57
by Jacko11
kerrminator wrote:After watching the fight again today sobre I scored it
Mutley-Anderson
1- 10-10
2- 10-8
3- 9-10
4- 10-9
5- 10-9
6- 10-9
7- 10-10
8- 9-10
9- 9-10
10- 8-10
95-95
and if Mutt got up from the knockdown Kev was clearly going to get in the tenth I could honestly see Kev taking the last two rounds and winning on points which would be a grand total of 113-115
Are you Jim Watt's nephew or cousin hahahahaha..... un real mate unreal
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 16:35
by Horse
Jacko11 wrote:kerrminator wrote:After watching the fight again today sobre I scored it
Mutley-Anderson
1- 10-10
2- 10-8
3- 9-10
4- 10-9
5- 10-9
6- 10-9
7- 10-10
8- 9-10
9- 9-10
10- 8-10
95-95
and if Mutt got up from the knockdown Kev was clearly going to get in the tenth I could honestly see Kev taking the last two rounds and winning on points which would be a grand total of 113-115
Are you Jim Watt's nephew or cousin hahahahaha..... un real mate unreal
Let's see your scorecard then.
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 17:06
by jimcook
b_hammersley wrote:I'll tell you why Daws should be worried from Muttley, cause Muttley would be far too strong for him! He showed me a lot in that fight, great fighter just got beaten by a better one. Muttley would be far too much for Daws, can't ever see them taking that fight, the first big hook would finish Daws.
i think thats being a bit unfair to daws.daws swallowed plenty of big punches in his last fight,from a sharp and fast southpaw opponent.didnt stop him coming forward tho. maybe daws would prove less easy to hit than anderson was.im not taking anything away from either anderson or muttley,but come on muttleys not kostya zoo is he.
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 18:45
by b_hammersley
Come on mate, ok, as you say Muttley isn't Kosta, but neither is Daws! Maybe Daws did take some shots from the southpaw but he wasn't/ isn't as good as Muttley. Muttley would be too strong for Daws imo. Kev did take more shots than normal, but would Daws take less, who knows? But I do know he wouldn't have got back up from Muttleys 2nd round left hand. Okay a couple of the guys have been saying Muttley was the better fighter on the night, sorry how can that be, he lost? He may have been "winning" on the judges score cards but he got nailed so in my book he wasn't better

I would give Daws big respect if he took on Muttley but it aint going to happen.
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 23:13
by Jacko11
He out boxed Kev till the later rounds it was on tv mate most of the country saw it, Kev won he stopped him....one punch then an onslaught did it, how was Kev the better BOXER on the night
Posted: 03 Jun 2006, 02:08
by kerrminator
Jacko11 wrote:He out boxed Kev till the later rounds it was on tv mate most of the country saw it, Kev won he stopped him....one punch then an onslaught did it, how was Kev the better BOXER on the night
Because boxing is ultimately first and foremost about beating your opponent and if im not mistaken thats what Kev did, is it not?
Posted: 03 Jun 2006, 02:10
by kerrminator
Jacko11 wrote:kerrminator wrote:After watching the fight again today sobre I scored it
Mutley-Anderson
1- 10-10
2- 10-8
3- 9-10
4- 10-9
5- 10-9
6- 10-9
7- 10-10
8- 9-10
9- 9-10
10- 8-10
95-95
and if Mutt got up from the knockdown Kev was clearly going to get in the tenth I could honestly see Kev taking the last two rounds and winning on points which would be a grand total of 113-115
Are you Jim Watt's nephew or cousin hahahahaha..... un real mate unreal
Well why dont you tell us what rounds you think are different than the ones I scored(the 1st round might go to Mutt for landing 1 big punch but its not all about landing 1 shot when it comes to scoring, is it?)
Posted: 03 Jun 2006, 05:49
by Jacko11
End of the day mate Kev won fair and sqaure....i aint gonna get into a sily debate i boxed my self for years and i know what the word boxing means.... making ur oponent miss,using the ring....dominating....knocking ur opponent down...Thats waht the Mut did for 8 rounds....end of story
like i say Kev won i hope he goes on to do his counrty proud
Posted: 03 Jun 2006, 11:11
by kerrminator
Its not a silly debate mate, its pretty much how the rounds actually went(plenty of fans both sides of the match have agreed with me)
You might have boxed but so have loads of people on the boxing forums.
as I said, its my opinion of the scores and im pretty sure its not too far away from the truth.
any thoughts anyone
Posted: 03 Jun 2006, 14:23
by Top Dog
I agree with you Kerrminator, the score was a lot closer than 5 rounds, but with 3 english judges and an english ref what do you expect. It would have been a lot closer if the blind ref hadn't ruled out Andersons legit knock down of Mutley in the second, a slip, my arse. Do you think Muttelys crew would have been happy with 3 scottish judges and a scottish ref, don't think so! Ok, Kev got caught with a bone cruncher of a hook, but credit where it due, he postively bounced back up with no sign of a wobble and then got tore into Muttley. The only reason he boxed sub par (for him) was cause his rythm had gone, took him a couple of rounds to get it back. And lets face it, it was hardly a lucky one punch that took Muttley out, the shot was a cracker followed up by sheer drive and power to take Muttley out impressively. Got schooled my arse, one hot day don't make a summer. Well done Kev my son, tighten the defence up, get the head moving a little more and take out that wee pumped up dud Michael Jennings. Ando will tear him to bits!!!!!! Bow down all yee doubters

Especially DG

Posted: 05 Jun 2006, 08:57
by MightyWarrior
What an amazing fight. Huge credit to both fighters, not a fight anyone will forget in a long time.
There seemed no way back for Anderson, and I still can't believe Muttley lost it, after looking the real deal for most of the fight. Poor guy must be absolutely gutted - hope he can come back even stronger.
Anderson pulled off a truly amazing win, and showed a great chin and unbelievable heart to pull it out late on, but he took a hell of a pounding for 10 rounds or so - a long rest must be needed.
If ever there needed to be a rematch this is it. Who would be favorite 2nd time round? In fact Muttley might be a slight favorite with the bookies, who may see it as a once in a life time lucky punch Anderson landed.
Impossible to call really.
Posted: 05 Jun 2006, 12:53
by Jacko11
MightyWarrior wrote:What an amazing fight. Huge credit to both fighters, not a fight anyone will forget in a long time.
There seemed no way back for Anderson, and I still can't believe Muttley lost it, after looking the real deal for most of the fight. Poor guy must be absolutely gutted - hope he can come back even stronger.
Anderson pulled off a truly amazing win, and showed a great chin and unbelievable heart to pull it out late on, but he took a hell of a pounding for 10 rounds or so - a long rest must be needed.
If ever there needed to be a rematch this is it. Who would be favorite 2nd time round? In fact Muttley might be a slight favorite with the bookies, who may see it as a once in a life time lucky punch Anderson landed.
Impossible to call really.
According to kerrminator he had it 95 -95 going into the 10th......One punch Anderson? dont say that to Kermy
Posted: 05 Jun 2006, 17:49
by kerrminator
If you read the post Jacko you will see I had it 95-95 considering the 10th was counted,
ie. had Mutt taken a knee to give himself a little breathing space it would have been level on my card.
Mutt had a great 1st half of the fight but Kev was clearly getting back into it in the latter rounds.
I can see where you would suggest Mutt was dominating as I only gave Kev 1 round between the first and seventh rounds (with the 1st and 7th shared)
its really not that unbelievable, again, why not put your scorecard up?
Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 08:44
by Top Dog
Th rematch wont happen cause by Muttleys own words, Anderson turned out to be too strong in the end. The Mutt is moving back down to L/W anyway, if he can keep the strength from that fight I can't see anyone beating him, far too good for Daws etc. I think Anderson would win a rematch anyway cause Muttley boxed out of his skin, probably never be as good, whereas Anderson didn't box anywhere near his potential and was still too good in the end. To catch Muttley with a peach of a punch and then go into overdrive to finish him was impressive, especially after 10 rounds, super fit guy.
Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 09:05
by TerribleTerry
Kudos to Kevin on an excellent win - but I fear it exposed his limitations. He certainly doent have the skills to compete for a genuine world title IMO. I am glad to see a few of you jocks are belatedly giving The Mutt his dues now.
Before the fight people were saying he couldnt punch, was a poor boxer etc etc. I think he proved his worth last Thursday, even if ultimately he came up short.
Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 10:48
by kerrminator
TerribleTerry wrote:Kudos to Kevin on an excellent win - but I fear it exposed his limitations. He certainly doent have the skills to compete for a genuine world title IMO. I am glad to see a few of you jocks are belatedly giving The Mutt his dues now.
Before the fight people were saying he couldnt punch, was a poor boxer etc etc. I think he proved his worth last Thursday, even if ultimately he came up short.
I certainly rate Mutt higher than I did before as I really only gave him a punchers chance.
However, I dont really think its fair to say Kev has met his limitations as he has only just turned 23 and has a long time to fulfill his potential.
Both fighters will take more from a fight like that one than any 10 fights against easy opponents and if they put it to good use in training there will be plenty more good fights from them both yet to come.
Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 10:54
by TerribleTerry
kerrminator wrote:TerribleTerry wrote:Kudos to Kevin on an excellent win - but I fear it exposed his limitations. He certainly doent have the skills to compete for a genuine world title IMO. I am glad to see a few of you jocks are belatedly giving The Mutt his dues now.
Before the fight people were saying he couldnt punch, was a poor boxer etc etc. I think he proved his worth last Thursday, even if ultimately he came up short.
I certainly rate Mutt higher than I did before as I really only gave him a punchers chance.
However, I dont really think its fair to say Kev has met his limitations as he has only just turned 23 and has a long time to fulfill his potential.
Both fighters will take more from a fight like that one than any 10 fights against easy opponents and if they put it to good use in training there will be plenty more good fights from them both yet to come.
Lets hope so!!
It was a splendid scrap and both deserve to get plenty of worthy assignments off the back of it...
Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 19:08
by Top Dog
Agree with you there Terry, Muttley certainly gets a thumbs up from me now after that. He was defo looking the real deal before Anderson burst into life, shouldn't have broken the wee mans tooth

Think Anderson can go a lot further, he didn't box anywhere near his potential, will be a better fighter for this one. As for the Mutt, I actually like the guy now, he put up a great fight and showed a lot of heart so will be on his side next time
