lvlarc
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871 Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24
Post
by lvlarc » 10 Mar 2007, 20:01
Matthews is a dirty fvcker. He should have been DQ'd a long time ago!
steve689
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660 Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50
Post
by steve689 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:02
Duke has started whining a bit. Matthews should write the book of fouls, very dirty.
steve689
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660 Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50
Post
by steve689 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:05
Matthews should be kicked out. He fell on Simpson and started whacking him as they both got up
That cut is getting pretty horrific.
Last edited by
steve689 on 10 Mar 2007, 20:05, edited 1 time in total.
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933 Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
Post
by My T Sharp » 10 Mar 2007, 20:05
Rd 10
Looks like Matthews needs at least a knock down, Duke Mckenzie has Simpson 3 in front, with 3 to go.
Cleaner work from Matthews, Simpson maybe taking a break.
Matthews 10-9
Simpson (96-94)
O'Connell, Paris and Rogers are the judges.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150 Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Post
by hitman_hatton1 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:06
steve689 wrote: Matthews should be kicked out. He fell on Simpson and started whacking him as they both got up
vann did sod all after that one either.
simpson should be stopped with that cut.
armageto
Heavyweight
Posts: 5260 Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15
Post
by armageto » 10 Mar 2007, 20:06
The promotion favors Matthews, correct?
steve689
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660 Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50
Post
by steve689 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:07
armageto wrote: The promotion favors Matthews, correct?
Correct Thomas
armageto
Heavyweight
Posts: 5260 Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15
Post
by armageto » 10 Mar 2007, 20:08
steve689 wrote: armageto wrote: The promotion favors Matthews, correct?
Correct Thomas
I see Matthews winning a close one then....
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933 Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
Post
by My T Sharp » 10 Mar 2007, 20:09
Rd 11
Will Simpson have to decide on keeping the British or WBU????
Not alot of work from Simpson.
Matthews 10-9
(Simpson 105-104)
Last edited by
My T Sharp on 10 Mar 2007, 20:10, edited 1 time in total.
JC
Heavyweight
Posts: 4559 Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04
Post
by JC » 10 Mar 2007, 20:09
Matthews' use of the laces would make Fitzie Zivic blush.
steve689
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660 Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50
Post
by steve689 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:09
Me too, Matthews is so cynical pushing his head into Simpson's cut it's pretty disgraceful. It's close now though into round 12.
armageto
Heavyweight
Posts: 5260 Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15
Post
by armageto » 10 Mar 2007, 20:11
Simpson might be killing his own cause here by not letting his hands go in the championship rounds......
steve689
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660 Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50
Post
by steve689 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:13
Simpson seemed to touch down but he didnt go, Simpson won that round he was busier IMO Matthews hasn't impressed me at all he is very ordinary and was very reluctant to shake Simpsons hand dont know why the dirty c**t.
Simpson wins on the 689 card!
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933 Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
Post
by My T Sharp » 10 Mar 2007, 20:14
Duke McKenzie has Simpson 1 up, John Rawling has it even, Barry McGuigan has Matthews 1 up...going into last round
Rd 12
Matthews slams Simpson against the ropes, did he touch down...
Mickey Vann says no, fight on
Fight goes the distance
Matthews 10-9
114-114
McKenzie & McGuigan gave the round to Simpson
steve689
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660 Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50
Post
by steve689 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:15
Barry McGuigan had it even but it doesn't matter what he thinks as he has zero credibility anymore anyway :P Duke went for Simpson, Rawling for Matthews.
The moment of truth awaits....
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933 Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
Post
by My T Sharp » 10 Mar 2007, 20:16
Quick decision from Michael Pass
118-112 O'Connell
117-110 Paris
113-111 Rogers
Matthews wins
JC
Heavyweight
Posts: 4559 Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04
Post
by JC » 10 Mar 2007, 20:16
Those scores are total bullshit, should be investigated.
steve689
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660 Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50
Post
by steve689 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:16
118-112, 117-110 & 113-111
118-112 and 117-110 what type of home fighter, home promotion scoring is that. fornicating terrible.
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871 Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24
Post
by lvlarc » 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
Totally corrupt scores. FARCE!
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933 Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
Post
by My T Sharp » 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
Was that impossible with the scoring??
1 knock down and 2pts deducted
armageto
Heavyweight
Posts: 5260 Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15
Post
by armageto » 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
My T Sharp wrote: Quick decision from Michael Pass
118-112 O'Connell
117-110 Paris
113-111 Rogers
Matthews wins
I'm glad he won for my parlay, but those scores look like utter B.S. My theory of the promotional fighter holds true again....
Romi
Heavyweight
Posts: 227 Joined: 30 Oct 2006, 23:58
Post
by Romi » 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
WOWWWWWWWWWW!!!!! My fcking heart stopped about 10 times the past 45 mins... MANY Thx for the updates EVERYBODY!!!!!!
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660 Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43
Post
by jomothepure » 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
118-112 O'Connell
117-110 Paris
fornicate off. Matthews was a dirty little prick too. Simpson did extremely well up until the cut - for a "challenger" that is
steve689
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660 Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50
Post
by steve689 » 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
Wasn't it Dave Parris that scored 117-112 for Lenny Daws V Barry Morrison? He needs to be dismissed under the trade descriptions act for posing as a judge.
armageto
Heavyweight
Posts: 5260 Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15
Post
by armageto » 10 Mar 2007, 20:18
Thanks for the RBR...bad judging strikes again!!