Page 4 of 6

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:01
by lvlarc
Matthews is a dirty fvcker. He should have been DQ'd a long time ago!

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:02
by steve689
Duke has started whining a bit. Matthews should write the book of fouls, very dirty.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:05
by steve689
Matthews should be kicked out. He fell on Simpson and started whacking him as they both got up :o

That cut is getting pretty horrific.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:05
by My T Sharp
Rd 10

Looks like Matthews needs at least a knock down, Duke Mckenzie has Simpson 3 in front, with 3 to go.

Cleaner work from Matthews, Simpson maybe taking a break.

Matthews 10-9

Simpson (96-94)

O'Connell, Paris and Rogers are the judges.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:06
by hitman_hatton1
steve689 wrote:Matthews should be kicked out. He fell on Simpson and started whacking him as they both got up :o
vann did sod all after that one either.

simpson should be stopped with that cut.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:06
by armageto
The promotion favors Matthews, correct?

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:07
by steve689
armageto wrote:The promotion favors Matthews, correct?
Correct Thomas :TU:

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:08
by armageto
steve689 wrote:
armageto wrote:The promotion favors Matthews, correct?
Correct Thomas :TU:
I see Matthews winning a close one then....

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:09
by My T Sharp
Rd 11

Will Simpson have to decide on keeping the British or WBU????

Not alot of work from Simpson.

Matthews 10-9

(Simpson 105-104)

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:09
by JC
Matthews' use of the laces would make Fitzie Zivic blush.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:09
by steve689
Me too, Matthews is so cynical pushing his head into Simpson's cut it's pretty disgraceful. It's close now though into round 12.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:11
by armageto
Simpson might be killing his own cause here by not letting his hands go in the championship rounds......

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:13
by steve689
Simpson seemed to touch down but he didnt go, Simpson won that round he was busier IMO Matthews hasn't impressed me at all he is very ordinary and was very reluctant to shake Simpsons hand dont know why the dirty c**t.

Simpson wins on the 689 card!

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:14
by My T Sharp
Duke McKenzie has Simpson 1 up, John Rawling has it even, Barry McGuigan has Matthews 1 up...going into last round

Rd 12


Matthews slams Simpson against the ropes, did he touch down...

Mickey Vann says no, fight on

Fight goes the distance

Matthews 10-9

114-114

McKenzie & McGuigan gave the round to Simpson

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:15
by steve689
Barry McGuigan had it even but it doesn't matter what he thinks as he has zero credibility anymore anyway :P Duke went for Simpson, Rawling for Matthews.

The moment of truth awaits....

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:16
by My T Sharp
Quick decision from Michael Pass

118-112 O'Connell
117-110 Paris
113-111 Rogers

Matthews wins :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:16
by JC
Those scores are total bullshit, should be investigated.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:16
by steve689
118-112, 117-110 & 113-111

118-112 and 117-110 what type of home fighter, home promotion scoring is that. fornicating terrible.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
by lvlarc
Totally corrupt scores. FARCE!

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
by My T Sharp
Was that impossible with the scoring??

1 knock down and 2pts deducted

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
by armageto
My T Sharp wrote:Quick decision from Michael Pass

118-112 O'Connell
117-110 Paris
113-111 Rogers

Matthews wins :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

I'm glad he won for my parlay, but those scores look like utter B.S. My theory of the promotional fighter holds true again....

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
by Romi
WOWWWWWWWWWW!!!!! My fcking heart stopped about 10 times the past 45 mins... MANY Thx for the updates EVERYBODY!!!!!!

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
by jomothepure
118-112 O'Connell
117-110 Paris

fornicate off. Matthews was a dirty little prick too. Simpson did extremely well up until the cut - for a "challenger" that is

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:17
by steve689
Wasn't it Dave Parris that scored 117-112 for Lenny Daws V Barry Morrison? He needs to be dismissed under the trade descriptions act for posing as a judge.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 20:18
by armageto
Thanks for the RBR...bad judging strikes again!!