Page 4 of 4

Posted: 01 Sep 2007, 10:24
by kevo
Max Molyneux wrote:No way In hell does Kessler have a chance.
Of course he has a chance!!!

Tha statement doesn't make you blinkered, it makes you delusional!

Posted: 01 Sep 2007, 13:31
by Max Molyneux
Kevo wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:No way In hell does Kessler have a chance.
Of course he has a chance!!!

Tha statement doesn't make you blinkered, it makes you delusional!
I was the same when all the Lacy hype was going on.

Kessler's a little better but I still feel the same.

People who bought the Lacy hype were even more delusional when defending his struggles against Sheika.

Posted: 01 Sep 2007, 13:35
by kevo
Max Molyneux wrote:
Kevo wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:No way In hell does Kessler have a chance.
Of course he has a chance!!!

Tha statement doesn't make you blinkered, it makes you delusional!
I was the same when all the Lacy hype was going on.

Kessler's a little better but I still feel the same.

People who bought the Lacy hype were even more delusional when defending his struggles against Sheika.
But even the people that bought into the Lacy Hype didn't say Calzaghe had no chance, they just made Lacy the favourite.
Max Molyneux wrote:No way In hell does Kessler have a chance.
There's no way you can defend that statement, Kessler is the number two behind Calzaghe, and a close number two at that. To say he hasn't a chance in hell is just plain stupid!

Posted: 01 Sep 2007, 13:56
by Max Molyneux
Kessler Is no doubt the No 2 and I'd favour him against anyone else but Calzaghe.

They made Lacy the favourite but said he wasn't struggling against guys like Sheika when he clearly was.

Kessler fans are worse when they rate Andrade so highly when he hasn't done anything except beat a past his prime Otis Grant and beat journymen. Some thought Andrade would give a tough fight and even be a threat.

Some I think might of thought Adrade was better than Lacy. Lacy won a title whats Adrade done?

Posted: 02 Sep 2007, 09:53
by WildWaylon
Autobarn wrote:
WildWaylon wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Kessler is no threat. He got his titles by saving up coupons cut out from Cornflakes boxes. He will lose in November because Calzaghe has more faster hands & a more tighter defense. He is only coming over to cash in. How can he call himself a champ; he never even beat a US Olympian. He already knows he's going to lose because he has gone to Monaco for training - something he's never done before for other fights. It's not even a good fight. It will be too one-sided. We need to see Joe vs a stylish American like Winky Wright.
I am quite amazed you should think this is a one sided fight - Yes we know how good Joe is but even so it could be his toughest fight to date and it wouldnt surprise me if it was - Its a great match up between two champions who want to unify and Kessler is comming here to try to win and not for any other reason - Kessler is a genuine threat, and no way is this fight a forgone conclusion for either man - If Joe wins, and I think he will, fights with Hopkins or Wright could follow, I hope so anyway - At the moment though this is the best fight to have and if Joe can beat Kessler and be the holder of all three belts it will be a fantastic acheivement - I firmly believe Joe will retire on a high having proved he is one of our best champions ever.
I'm having a sick joke. You should read further ABOVE if you cannot see what is obviously a tone of IRONY.
I am even more confused as the word irony is not exactly applicable - As for bad spelling or bad English you see plenty on here so its not exactly unusual, however my own spelling is not wonderful which is why I have always employed good secretaries - The one thing noticeable about your post was that it wasnt in keeping with the sort of thing you usually write which is generally worth reading and pretty accurate - Sorry I missed the joke, you should speak proper just like what I do. :lol: :lol: :lol: