Page 4 of 6
Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 18:16
by sweetscience
well its pritty obvious
they either paid more or had a long standing relationship with someone in the industry
fair play to them, if they made a mint from it, i wish id got onto it
Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 18:20
by Spud
sweetscience wrote:well its pritty obvious
they either paid more or had a long standing relationship with someone in the industry
fair play to them, if they made a mint from it, i wish id got onto it
It still means the fans got exploited then doesn't it?
Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 18:24
by states
Spud wrote:
I will not let this go until I find out why the Travel Agents got their hands on so many tickets - someone somewhere knows!!!
Might I suggest that they're not to be found on this forum though?
Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 19:05
by rhino222
if you had accompanied team hatton to vegas for the mayweather fight spud....... would we be getting all of this continual bollocks ?
Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 20:22
by whatashambles
sweetscience wrote:
well its pritty obvious
they either paid more or had a long standing relationship with someone in the industry
fair play to them, if they made a mint from it, i wish id got onto it
It still means the fans got exploited then doesn't it?
What do you expect? Why should they care when they can make a mint. The whole Ricky is just a normal guy thing has always been a load of bollocks.
The Hatton's sold all their tickets and made loads. Do you really expect them to say no in fact keep your millions we'll give tickets to the real fans instead?
Money talks. Why were the majority of tickets £300+ instead of £30. Because they can sell all their tickets at £300. I'm surprised they didn't set face value higher. It could have sold for a lot more.
As for Celebs what do you expect? They're celebs they would have got them no matter.
Frankly who cares. It's the way the world works. if you can't afford the tickets or have to get out a loan don't go. I saved and went to De La Hoya/ Mayweather. It cost me a couple of thousand and meant I couldn't go to Mayweather/Hatton but so be it. You can't have everything in life.
Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 23:37
by Collins2000
Spud wrote:oliverfennell wrote:DavidPayne wrote:Spud has a promoter's suit you know.
Not sure which one, but he must have been significantly bigger than the current tennant.
Derek Williams perhaps.
Can we get back to boxing by the way rather the nuances of Spud's complex psychology?
I know Spud would prefer to, too.
Back to boxing, quite.
Was he knocked out by King or not?
Nope - read the other thread - myself and Kingy roomed together and had quite a week together - spent far too much money enjoying ourselves.
Kingy is like myself an ex squaddie - I like him despite his faults - we had the same sense of humour and as such we got on bloody well. His fist brushed my chin accidentally but contrary to reports he failed to knock me out which says a lot for his boxing abilities - it has to be said when the "accident" happened I was cursing like a silly tw*t.
Myself and Kingy flew out together and flew back together and he even invited me to Thailand but that would have got me into far too much trouble.
Anyhow back to the thread in hand ...
Speaking of ex-squaddies who like sleeping together, is there a chance of you and rhino becoming an item again? I see you have been sniffing around each other in a couple of threads over the last few days.
What's that line you come out with? Something like "I'm not making any accusations, just asking questions."

Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 04:31
by Spud
rhino222 wrote:if you had accompanied team hatton to vegas for the mayweather fight spud....... would we be getting all of this continual bollocks ?
Rhino - I will answer yours first - the honest answer no I would have not - nor would you or any other person if you were in the same position - thats just how boxing and life works.
However whether the likes of you and others believe it or not I do not care - In June whilst we were in Vegas - there was an incident that meant - I MADE A DECISION THAT I WOULD NEVER WORK ON ANOTHER HATTON SHOW AGAIN - I COULD NOT STAND THE BEHIND THE SCENES BACK STABBING WHICH IN MY OPINION WAS GOING ON THEN!!!!
To back my claim that I would never be involved again - The incident was a conversation which took place between myself and 2 other people - immediately that night I reported that conversation to the appropriate people - I was naive in the extreme to expect that everyone would be working together to make a highly successful promotion - in addition I even spoke to 3 members of this forum whilst I was out there in Vegas - that I knew then I would never return under the same sort of circumstances. 2 members of this forum are active and would back my claims although they do not know what the conversation I refer to was about.
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 04:33
by Spud
Collins2000 wrote:Spud wrote:oliverfennell wrote:
Back to boxing, quite.
Was he knocked out by King or not?
Nope - read the other thread - myself and Kingy roomed together and had quite a week together - spent far too much money enjoying ourselves.
Kingy is like myself an ex squaddie - I like him despite his faults - we had the same sense of humour and as such we got on bloody well. His fist brushed my chin accidentally but contrary to reports he failed to knock me out which says a lot for his boxing abilities - it has to be said when the "accident" happened I was cursing like a silly tw*t.
Myself and Kingy flew out together and flew back together and he even invited me to Thailand but that would have got me into far too much trouble.
Anyhow back to the thread in hand ...
Speaking of ex-squaddies who like sleeping together, is there a chance of you and rhino becoming an item again? I see you have been sniffing around each other in a couple of threads over the last few days.
What's that line you come out with? Something like "I'm not making any accusations, just asking questions."

Do not be silly. Rhino will continue to goad me for as long as it entertains his weird sense of humour.
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 04:38
by Spud
whatashambles wrote:sweetscience wrote:
well its pritty obvious
they either paid more or had a long standing relationship with someone in the industry
fair play to them, if they made a mint from it, i wish id got onto it
It still means the fans got exploited then doesn't it?
What do you expect? Why should they care when they can make a mint. The whole Ricky is just a normal guy thing has always been a load of bollocks.
The Hatton's sold all their tickets and made loads. Do you really expect them to say no in fact keep your millions we'll give tickets to the real fans instead?
Money talks. Why were the majority of tickets £300+ instead of £30. Because they can sell all their tickets at £300. I'm surprised they didn't set face value higher. It could have sold for a lot more.
As for Celebs what do you expect? They're celebs they would have got them no matter.
Frankly who cares. It's the way the world works. if you can't afford the tickets or have to get out a loan don't go. I saved and went to De La Hoya/ Mayweather. It cost me a couple of thousand and meant I couldn't go to Mayweather/Hatton but so be it. You can't have everything in life.
I will repeat and you and others need to get it in your heads - I was not and am still not referring all of this b*llocks just on the Hatton's - that would be wrong of me to do so.
The whole saga concerning tickets on this promotion in my opinion was wrong - it was outrageous for so many Travel Agents to have had their hands on so many tickets and to then make a considerable mark up on those tickets.
The only thing I will quite openly blame Team Hatton for is - they had the forsight to negoitiate a very very good deal for Ricky - yet they failed to get a good deal for the fans in that in my opinion the allocation of 3,900 tickets for Hatton fans was derisory.
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 04:54
by dondada
Terry D wrote:beagleboy wrote:boxingchat wrote:It is heavily rumoured that Billy Graham and chief bag-carrier Paul Speak nearly came to blows several times during preparation. Graham has never liked nor suffered the camera wearing ex-cop who is noting more than a hanger-on who bows to Hatton's every whim and makes sure Ray's bum is sparkly clean.
Billy feels that too many people are back-slapping and arranging things for Hatton when he should be concentrating on getting in shape.
It's been brewing along time and Speak is being blamed by Graham for alot of the problems within.
Speak knws jack-all about boxing or business being a career copper all his life. Even Lonsdale were dropped with no repalcement sponsor due to Speak being greedy.
The Hatton camp (Excluding Ricky) acted like drunken louts for most of their US stay with the aforementioned getting increasingly irritable with each other throughout.
Thanks BC
For all the high-brow journo's on here, we get more info from BC's entertaining snippets
That's enough praise or he'll get me a WBU shot

Fair point. BC is entertaining enough and throws stuff up but the other side of the story is that if there is one sniff of criticism against allegedly on here he'll run it straight to his boss and the strand will be ran straight off the forum. Any really bad stuff will see this helpful guy ensure that Boxrec, and the poster if possible one day, gets hit hard.
They are not the Robin Hoods of blabber mouthing. Taking information from the closed camps and spreading it amongst fellow fans for the love of transparency in the sport. We are not seeing a huge up swell in altruism here. Just two axes grinding away.
I'll be brief.
Terry (above) is right.
Boxing Chat is right.
Spud is right.
Ben is right.
A lot of you are saying 'so what, that's life' about the ticket situation. This is certainly pragmatic but a bit defeatist - especially when we have to suffer the 'man of the people' charade. Deep down I certainly believe it to be true but it didn't extend to a lot of fairness for his legion of fans.
There are a lot of people on here pushing their own agendas because they are involved with promoters or used to be - it's difficult to cut through the nonsense. And when you do...the lawyers come calling anyway!

Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 05:14
by Khaosai-Galaxy
search wrote:well it seems Spud has uined enough forums and this is his next stop. lets look at his CV...
Eastsideboxing forum - became Mod and banned several members of this board on a powertrip. Ruined the board and got banned.
Doghouse Boxing - same story the owner Glaxor banned him.
Previously worked for Hennessy and slated Hatton all accross the boards.
Started working for Hobson and became a Hatton fan all of a sudden.
Continually feels the need to start topics where the underlying message is , "I KNOW MORE THAN YOU BUT I AM NOT TELLING YOU".
All this from a 40-50 year old man.
Got to say, what a flipping idiot.
Ban him I say before the forum turns into garbage. He is a Prize A Prat.
He also once contacted a forum members workplace and tried to get them fired after they dared question him on ESB
classy!
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 06:50
by Sammy Mendelson
Spud wrote:rhino222 wrote:if you had accompanied team hatton to vegas for the mayweather fight spud....... would we be getting all of this continual bollocks ?
Rhino - I will answer yours first - the honest answer no I would have not - nor would you or any other person if you were in the same position - thats just how boxing and life works.
However whether the likes of you and others believe it or not I do not care - In June whilst we were in Vegas - there was an incident that meant - I MADE A DECISION THAT I WOULD NEVER WORK ON ANOTHER HATTON SHOW AGAIN - I COULD NOT STAND THE BEHIND THE SCENES BACK STABBING WHICH IN MY OPINION WAS GOING ON THEN!!!!
To back my claim that I would never be involved again - The incident was a conversation which took place between myself and 2 other people - immediately that night I reported that conversation to the appropriate people - I was naive in the extreme to expect that everyone would be working together to make a highly successful promotion - in addition I even spoke to 3 members of this forum whilst I was out there in Vegas - that I knew then I would never return under the same sort of circumstances. 2 members of this forum are active and would back my claims although they do not know what the conversation I refer to was about.
So you were involved in a conversation with two others who clearly trusted you enough to be party to it. You decided they were "back stabbing" and scurried off to slag them off to the "appropriate people". What's the word I'm looking for..? I think it starts with H and ends with ypocrit!
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 08:21
by boxingchat
I would be interested to know whether Spud has EVER bought a ticket for any show he has ever been to. Usually he is just another Boxing groupie hanging on to his latest Promoter buddy's short tail until one-by-one they realise he is just a knob and get rid of him.
To think our teaxes used to pay for this prick to be in the armed forces albeit just a wages clerk but nevertheless he wasn't even deemed suitable for target practice for the insurgents.
Mind you with a head like that he was hardly fair sport.
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 08:55
by beagleboy
Spud wrote:oliverfennell wrote:DavidPayne wrote:Spud has a promoter's suit you know.
Not sure which one, but he must have been significantly bigger than the current tennant.
Derek Williams perhaps.
Can we get back to boxing by the way rather the nuances of Spud's complex psychology?
I know Spud would prefer to, too.
Back to boxing, quite.
Was he knocked out by King or not?
Nope - read the other thread - myself and Kingy roomed together and had quite a week together - spent far too much money enjoying ourselves.
Kingy is like myself an ex squaddie - I like him despite his faults - we had the same sense of humour and as such we got on bloody well. His fist brushed my chin accidentally but contrary to reports he failed to knock me out which says a lot for his boxing abilities - it has to be said when the "accident" happened I was cursing like a silly tw*t.
Myself and Kingy flew out together and flew back together and he even invited me to Thailand but that would have got me into far too much trouble.
Anyhow back to the thread in hand ...
spud, you seem to be constantly dropping this man's name
Are you aware of the charges he is facing?
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 09:02
by Sammy Mendelson
beagleboy wrote:Are you aware of the charges he is facing?
Perhaps you should remind him. What are they?
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 10:04
by nickd
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 10:22
by Sammy Mendelson
Who knows? Prostitutes with heroin addictions are not exactly reknowned for being the most trustworthy members of society.
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 11:07
by Chambers2
Sammy Mendelson wrote:Who knows? Prostitutes with heroin addictions are not exactly reknowned for being the most trustworthy members of society.
Only one was named as a smackhead
3 independent accusations of rape! Hes admitted to having sex with all 3, but he said that all 3 consented. No fcuking way that happens 3 times in 3 years!!
Its 'Section 42' for Kingy IMO, hopefully he can get to some of them other filthy bastards in there
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 11:20
by Sammy Mendelson
Well, we will have to await the jury's verdict. Let us not fall in the trap of assuming guilt before it is proven beyond all reasonable doubt.
Any defence worth a dime will be able to destroy any trace of credibility the three accusers may claim to have.
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 11:59
by scurlaruntings
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 12:18
by Sammy Mendelson
It will get even worse now you are here.
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 12:24
by oliverfennell
Spud wrote:If you were right - there is thread after thread that could be pulled to bits how you lot - have gone off track and completely ruined reasoned boxing debate.
You and others go and f*ck yourself if you think I am going anywhere - until of course I am banned.
Its f*cking amazing how you w*nkers cling together agreeing with each other craving for acceptance and slagging Spud - crack on its all rather amusing.
Ah, I see clearly now! Everybody else is wrong and you are right.
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 12:30
by scurlaruntings
Sammy Mendelson wrote:
It will get even worse now you are here.
Your telling me.I still cant believe that idiot is even around.What happened to his lacky Lightsoot.He used to be a decent poster but he used to lick some ass boy! Come back to ESB Spud!

Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 12:31
by oliverfennell
Spud wrote:rhino222 wrote:if you had accompanied team hatton to vegas for the mayweather fight spud....... would we be getting all of this continual bollocks ?
Rhino - I will answer yours first - the honest answer no I would have not - nor would you or any other person if you were in the same position - thats just how boxing and life works.
However whether the likes of you and others believe it or not I do not care - In June whilst we were in Vegas - there was an incident that meant - I MADE A DECISION THAT I WOULD NEVER WORK ON ANOTHER HATTON SHOW AGAIN - I COULD NOT STAND THE BEHIND THE SCENES BACK STABBING WHICH IN MY OPINION WAS GOING ON THEN!!!!
To back my claim that I would never be involved again - The incident was a conversation which took place between myself and 2 other people - immediately that night I reported that conversation to the appropriate people - I was naive in the extreme to expect that everyone would be working together to make a highly successful promotion - in addition I even spoke to 3 members of this forum whilst I was out there in Vegas - that I knew then I would never return under the same sort of circumstances. 2 members of this forum are active and would back my claims although they do not know what the conversation I refer to was about.
How can somebody back you up if they don't know what it's about? Do you have the kind of friends here who would show blind faith to you under any circumstances.
"If Spud said it's true, then it must be. He wouldn't lie. He wouldn't tell me what it was about, but he wouldn't lie."
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 12:35
by oliverfennell
Sammy Mendelson wrote:Well, we will have to await the jury's verdict. Let us not fall in the trap of assuming guilt before it is proven beyond all reasonable doubt.
Any defence worth a dime will be able to destroy any trace of credibility the three accusers may claim to have.
Yep, let's tread carefully on this one. I suggest withholding comment until a verdict is reached, either way.