BoxRec

Captain Hook wrote:

mark thompson wrote:good post captain and RJJ most probably would have beaten JC 10 years ago thats coz RJJ was in his prime then, but Calzaghe wasn't 10 years ago, he has shone in the last 4 years or so, so it's an unfair comparison that people make saying prime for prime because when the likes of RJJ, Bhop and Trinidad and whoever else were in their prime Calzaghe was not, Calzaghe beat a prime Lacy, and Kessler and would have done the same to Pavlik easily had Bhop not done it already .

Possibly, but if we're talking prime Joe v prime RJJ I'd go for Jones by wide points victory. He was just sublime.

mark thompson wrote:

Captain Hook wrote:

mark thompson wrote:good post captain and RJJ most probably would have beaten JC 10 years ago thats coz RJJ was in his prime then, but Calzaghe wasn't 10 years ago, he has shone in the last 4 years or so, so it's an unfair comparison that people make saying prime for prime because when the likes of RJJ, Bhop and Trinidad and whoever else were in their prime Calzaghe was not, Calzaghe beat a prime Lacy, and Kessler and would have done the same to Pavlik easily had Bhop not done it already .

Possibly, but if we're talking prime Joe v prime RJJ I'd go for Jones by wide points victory. He was just sublime.

Your probably right but thats just a mythical match up isn't ?