BoxRec

theres no proof of that yet.

J wrote:cos cotto beat mosely perhaps?

Had the Sugar man winning that 1

J wrote:academic.

sorry dont normally correct spellings just ironic to get academic wrong...apologies for the pomposity.

I sort of knew I'd f*cked up the spelling on that 1 and am now rightfully crushed

J wrote:theres no proof of that yet.

There is wnough to say something weird went on.

You do not just suspend people without good reason...hang on a minute, yes they do!

But you are right - time will tell!

Personally I think Cotto was lucky to get the decision over Shane, not a robbery but a close fight although I only saw it on the night and haven't seen it since. 8)

DG. wrote:

J wrote:theres no proof of that yet.

There is wnough to say something weird went on.

You do not just suspend people without good reason...hang on a minute, yes they do!

But you are right - time will tell!

There is nothing untoward to be proven regarding the margerito cotto fight nothing at all, nothing nada nix. Though i suppose you are gonna argue IF he is guilty in the Mosely fight then he MUST have done so in the Cotto fight. Dubious logic at best.

In addition nothing has been proven in the mosely fight yet. What happened to innocent til proven guilty? He is suspended while investigations take place, thats quite common you will find, it often happens if allegations are made, he isnt likely to fight in the next 2 months is he, I, So the impact if he is found innocent = zero. Hence the suspension.

Yes agree PN i had Mosely nicking the cotto fight as well unfortunately the judges didnt mate....

DG. wrote:

J wrote:cos cotto beat mosely perhaps?

Well done!

And after Antonio 'Hands of Plaster of Paris' Margarito beat Cotto by maybe using concrete it may mean that Cotto was robbed against AMHOPM!

Cotto's trainer said that Margarito's wraps were fine.

Asterix wrote:

DG. wrote:

J wrote:cos cotto beat mosely perhaps?

Well done!

And after Antonio 'Hands of Plaster of Paris' Margarito beat Cotto by maybe using concrete it may mean that Cotto was robbed against AMHOPM!

Cotto's trainer said that Margarito's wraps were fine.

Well, he wol hardly say now.

'They were like effing concrete!'

Chances are he did not see the whole process.

DG. wrote:Well, he wol hardly say now.

'They were like effing concrete!'

Chances are he did not see the whole process.

Actually, I'd expect him to scream bloody murder if there was a chance Margarito was cheating.

Asterix wrote:

DG. wrote:Well, he wol hardly say now.

'They were like effing concrete!'

Chances are he did not see the whole process.

Actually, I'd expect him to scream bloody murder if there was a chance Margarito was cheating.

But that would be an admission that he let his nephew get MASHED down when he thought something was wrong with thwe wraps.

If anyone will say something felt 'wrong' it will be Cotto.

DG. wrote:

Asterix wrote:Actually, I'd expect him to scream bloody murder if there was a chance Margarito was cheating.

But that would be an admission that he let his nephew get MASHED down when he thought something was wrong with thwe wraps.

If anyone will say something felt 'wrong' it will be Cotto.

No. I'm talking about Evangelista not knowing whether or not Margarito's wraps were loaded.

Asterix wrote:

DG. wrote:

Asterix wrote:Actually, I'd expect him to scream bloody murder if there was a chance Margarito was cheating.

But that would be an admission that he let his nephew get MASHED down when he thought something was wrong with thwe wraps.

If anyone will say something felt 'wrong' it will be Cotto.

No. I'm talking about Evangelista not knowing whether or not Margarito's wraps were loaded.

Is he not the trainer?

Would he not be present when the hands werer wrapped?

Yes to both!

DG. wrote:Is he not the trainer?

Would he not be present when the hands werer wrapped?

Yes to both!

You said earlier that he probably did not see the whole process. It's like you're arguing two polar points.

More to the point what was Mosley on to produce that type of performance, especially after looking like shit against Mayorga 8)

banjo wrote:More to the point what was Mosley on to produce that type of performance, especially after looking like shit against Mayorga 8)

I think he was more motivated and found Margarito's style a lot easier to deal with than Mayorga's.

banjo wrote:More to the point what was Mosley on to produce that type of performance, especially after looking like shit against Mayorga 8)

Some jerk Chicken with West Indian Hot pepper sauce.

Works for me!

haha the pepper sauce out here is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaaasss!

J wrote:haha the pepper sauce out here is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaaasss!

I have heard it was responsible for Lennox being so good!

first time i tried it i sprayed it all over my dinner like ketchup wont be doing that again.

J wrote: first time i tried it i sprayed it all over my dinner like ketchup wont be doing that again.

Thats a no no!

No!!! If Accrington Stanley beat Man Utd in the FA Cup would they be considered the best team in the world?

winkveron wrote:No!!! If Accrington Stanley beat Man Utd in the FA Cup would they be considered the best team in the world?

Imo, yes. :P

J wrote:yawns in apathy at DG's boringly predicatable conTinuation of hatton bashing.

Does anyone take his opinion seriously regardiing Hatton just curious?

Cue DG to explode into his usual J is a this that or other.....yawn.

TEDIOUS IN THE EXTREME.

In reposnse tot he thread off the back oa good performance and being dominant at 140 i'd put him top 3/4. Should he go on to fight one of Cotto / Mosely or maybe Marquez and be successful then I think he would have a pretty good claim for the 1 spot.

Big ifs though those...

See, that's what we need, nice sensible post from J there, top 5 if he beats Pacquaio, nowt wrong with that, but he's got to beat a few more to go top spot, or beat Mayweather in a rematch.

sensivble moi? surely not.

by the way home along 24th july til 7th august mrs back in uk so got house to myself, get your arse out here Jim.

I'll see what I can do mate!