Page 4 of 4
Re: Hamed/Barrerra
Posted: 27 Mar 2009, 18:15
by nobby_nobbins
I agree. The lightning fast, hungry Naz of 95 would have humiliated Barrera. Naz did everything wrong but his reflexes and speed allowed him to get away with it. Take away these assets and he was a sitting duck.
Re: Hamed/Barrerra
Posted: 30 Mar 2009, 07:01
by SLK
which version of MAB are you pitting against your '95 edition of Naz?
The 96 version that went toe to toe with McKinney, the 2000 version that went toe to toe with Morales, the 2001 counter puncher that beat Hamed?
You're doing him proud & I'm not sure he deserves such loyalty considering him comments during his very last fight
