Re: Conor Benn - What Next?
Posted: 24 Mar 2023, 15:01
Benn just tweeted “fight news soon”
I don’t think it was intentional though, he’s just that thickKiwiRider wrote: ↑23 Mar 2023, 23:07He has made a brilliant heel when I think about it.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑23 Mar 2023, 18:34 benn has looked awful at every stage of this, an example of how not to react to a controversy.............you could argue he's trying to go full on heel mode now, but he's too whiney to do that well
Hard core boxing fans want to see him smashed.
ashall2 wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 15:23
I don’t think it was intentional though, he’s just that thickKiwiRider wrote: ↑23 Mar 2023, 23:07He has made a brilliant heel when I think about it.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑23 Mar 2023, 18:34 benn has looked awful at every stage of this, an example of how not to react to a controversy.............you could argue he's trying to go full on heel mode now, but he's too whiney to do that well
Hard core boxing fans want to see him smashed.![]()
Bit by agonising bit, this sport just saps your soul….Controversial wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 09:40 Conor Benn vs Chris Eubank Jr is reportedly now "close to being announced" for June 3rd in Abu Dhabi, UAE after it was scrapped due to Benn's positive drugs tests last year. It's claimed they'll fight at full 160lbs middleweight limit. [According to @SunSport]
Yep!! I thought Eubank activated the Smith rematchDeserter wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 10:04Bit by agonising bit, this sport just saps your soul….Controversial wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 09:40 Conor Benn vs Chris Eubank Jr is reportedly now "close to being announced" for June 3rd in Abu Dhabi, UAE after it was scrapped due to Benn's positive drugs tests last year. It's claimed they'll fight at full 160lbs middleweight limit. [According to @SunSport]
as lucrative as this sh!t show may be, i doubt either are getting 100 million!whatashambles wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 11:39 More disappointed in Eubank than Benn in this. What kind of example does it set? Failed two tests, fails to submit necessary info to British Board of Boxing Control and yet still gets rewarded with (probably) a nine figure sum.
Get on them pads bro. The rewards are immensemargaret thatcher wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 11:51as lucrative as this sh!t show may be, i doubt either are getting 100 million!whatashambles wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 11:39 More disappointed in Eubank than Benn in this. What kind of example does it set? Failed two tests, fails to submit necessary info to British Board of Boxing Control and yet still gets rewarded with (probably) a nine figure sum.
Deserter wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 10:04Bit by agonising bit, this sport just saps your soul….Controversial wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 09:40 Conor Benn vs Chris Eubank Jr is reportedly now "close to being announced" for June 3rd in Abu Dhabi, UAE after it was scrapped due to Benn's positive drugs tests last year. It's claimed they'll fight at full 160lbs middleweight limit. [According to @SunSport]
SorryDeserter wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 10:04Bit by agonising bit, this sport just saps your soul….Controversial wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 09:40 Conor Benn vs Chris Eubank Jr is reportedly now "close to being announced" for June 3rd in Abu Dhabi, UAE after it was scrapped due to Benn's positive drugs tests last year. It's claimed they'll fight at full 160lbs middleweight limit. [According to @SunSport]
The Middle East Sanctioning board.stevec@france wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 12:51 who will sanction this tho ...
Benn is now a known drug cheat who is supposed to be A clearing his name and B intending to sue the BBOBC.
Big risk for Matchroom this as its really grimy .
and of course Eubank cant fight anyway as Liam Smith showed .
Sue the BBBC for what?stevec@france wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 12:51 who will sanction this tho ...
Benn is now a known drug cheat who is supposed to be A clearing his name and B intending to sue the BBOBC.
Big risk for Matchroom this as its really grimy .
and of course Eubank cant fight anyway as Liam Smith showed .
How can they when Benn doesn’t hold a BBBC license?polecateddy wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 12:56 It will be interesting to see if ‘The Board’ and UKAD actually stay silent if some disgusting deal is done to fight overseas? Presumably they’re itching to pull the trigger on a 2-4 year ban/suspension. Well you’d hope they are!
UKAD can rule on their own investigation, and I suppose the board could mirror them by saying Benn is suspended from applying for a license for X amount of time. I find it particularly unpalatable that Hearn thinks he's bigger than the Board and UKAD, and he can just talk his way to a lenient treatment. No Hearn it's 2-4 years, bugger off back to Essex!maverick23 wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 14:26How can they when Benn doesn’t hold a BBBC license?polecateddy wrote: ↑27 Mar 2023, 12:56 It will be interesting to see if ‘The Board’ and UKAD actually stay silent if some disgusting deal is done to fight overseas? Presumably they’re itching to pull the trigger on a 2-4 year ban/suspension. Well you’d hope they are!