Page 37 of 40

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 17 Aug 2026, 09:42
by Coco
Nightmare Roy wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 08:24
Baby Face Finster wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 08:18
banjo wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 04:47 80 is far too old to be running a country. Nobody old enough to draw a pension should be in that position.
They should add an amendment to the U.S. constitution that states a President can only serve between the ages of 35-65
Maybe they'll throw that in when they change it so a president can serve 3 terms :lol:
If they do it on like a biological age, surely Trump is only 25!

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 17 Aug 2026, 11:07
by giacomino
Coco wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 09:42
Nightmare Roy wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 08:24
Baby Face Finster wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 08:18

They should add an amendment to the U.S. constitution that states a President can only serve between the ages of 35-65
Maybe they'll throw that in when they change it so a president can serve 3 terms :lol:
If they do it on like a biological age, surely Trump is only 25!
More like 2 because he needs a nap all the time

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 17 Aug 2026, 11:32
by Nightmare Roy
giacomino wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 11:07
Coco wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 09:42
Nightmare Roy wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 08:24
Maybe they'll throw that in when they change it so a president can serve 3 terms :lol:
If they do it on like a biological age, surely Trump is only 25!
More like 2 because he needs a nap all the time
And he wears Nappies

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 17 Aug 2026, 18:10
by conan_the_cribber
banjo wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 04:47 80 is far too old to be running a country. Nobody old enough to draw a pension should be in that position.
Apparently 73 million Americans asked themselves the same question and went "hell no". I'd rather vote for this ancient, mentally impaired, lying con-man, who incited a riot on Jan 6th, than well, an intelligent black woman, who was a former VP and has led a life of public service.

Really, that was the choice and Americans chose that soiled daiper of a person.

And yeah, there should be age limits for all senior offices, President, VP, Cabinet Ministers, Senators and Supreme Court judges.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 17 Aug 2026, 18:44
by jujigatame
conan_the_cribber wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 18:10
banjo wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 04:47 80 is far too old to be running a country. Nobody old enough to draw a pension should be in that position.
Apparently 73 million Americans asked themselves the same question and went "hell no". I'd rather vote for this ancient, mentally impaired, lying con-man, who incited a riot on Jan 6th, than well, an intelligent black woman, who was a former VP and has led a life of public service.

Really, that was the choice and Americans chose that soiled daiper of a person.

And yeah, there should be age limits for all senior offices, President, VP, Cabinet Ministers, Senators and Supreme Court judges.
I have a buddy who almost certainly voted Trump who will call me and goof on Mamdani like he's the worst politician in the land right now. Even among the non-cultists, a lot of Trump voters really do not want to face up to the magnitude of their mistake.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 17 Aug 2026, 18:52
by Tony1244
conan_the_cribber wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 18:10
banjo wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 04:47 80 is far too old to be running a country. Nobody old enough to draw a pension should be in that position.
Apparently 73 million Americans asked themselves the same question and went "hell no". I'd rather vote for this ancient, mentally impaired, lying con-man, who incited a riot on Jan 6th, than well, an intelligent black woman, who was a former VP and has led a life of public service.

Really, that was the choice and Americans chose that soiled daiper of a person.

And yeah, there should be age limits for all senior offices, President, VP, Cabinet Ministers, Senators and Supreme Court judges.
Harris was a joke of a candidate. Courting the Cheneys and Bushes while shunning Dr. Phil, Joe Rogan, Bill Maher, and Howard Stern is full on mental retardation and nothing less. You can't f*cking giggle when being asked serious questions. I'm not saying she is mean. I am not saying she is dumb. I am saying she belongs in the private sector.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 17 Aug 2026, 21:56
by Perkin Warbeck
Another reason to hate Trump:


Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 18 Aug 2026, 00:41
by conan_the_cribber
Tony1244 wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 18:52
conan_the_cribber wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 18:10
banjo wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 04:47 80 is far too old to be running a country. Nobody old enough to draw a pension should be in that position.
Apparently 73 million Americans asked themselves the same question and went "hell no". I'd rather vote for this ancient, mentally impaired, lying con-man, who incited a riot on Jan 6th, than well, an intelligent black woman, who was a former VP and has led a life of public service.

Really, that was the choice and Americans chose that soiled daiper of a person.

And yeah, there should be age limits for all senior offices, President, VP, Cabinet Ministers, Senators and Supreme Court judges.


Harris was a joke of a candidate. Courting the Cheneys and Bushes while shunning Dr. Phil, Joe Rogan, Bill Maher, and Howard Stern is full on mental retardation and nothing less. You can't f*cking giggle when being asked serious questions. I'm not saying she is mean. I am not saying she is dumb. I am saying she belongs in the private sector.
As opposed to what? A guy with dementia, who can barely string a sentence together, A guy that start a riot after repeatedly lying about the election results. People expect perfection in Democrat candidates and yet are happy to accept garbage from Republican candidates. Two standards.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 18 Aug 2026, 10:44
by Tony1244
conan_the_cribber wrote: 18 Aug 2026, 00:41
Tony1244 wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 18:52
conan_the_cribber wrote: 17 Aug 2026, 18:10

Apparently 73 million Americans asked themselves the same question and went "hell no". I'd rather vote for this ancient, mentally impaired, lying con-man, who incited a riot on Jan 6th, than well, an intelligent black woman, who was a former VP and has led a life of public service.

Really, that was the choice and Americans chose that soiled daiper of a person.

And yeah, there should be age limits for all senior offices, President, VP, Cabinet Ministers, Senators and Supreme Court judges.


Harris was a joke of a candidate. Courting the Cheneys and Bushes while shunning Dr. Phil, Joe Rogan, Bill Maher, and Howard Stern is full on mental retardation and nothing less. You can't f*cking giggle when being asked serious questions. I'm not saying she is mean. I am not saying she is dumb. I am saying she belongs in the private sector.
As opposed to what? A guy with dementia, who can barely string a sentence together, A guy that start a riot after repeatedly lying about the election results. People expect perfection in Democrat candidates and yet are happy to accept garbage from Republican candidates. Two standards.
I voted for her. I'm talking abut how the swing voter operates.

Voting for trump after January 6th is inexcusable, but I'm not surprised because people don't remember anything.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 18 Aug 2026, 14:00
by gilgamesh
Most of the people that voted for Trump the 1st time would've been there happily beating on doors, and threatening to hang Mike Pence on January 6th with 'em if they weren't poor White trash. The reason why more people weren't there is because they're too stupid to be able to read about people organizing things or too poor to afford the gas money/plane ticket to get there.

I think any of the people that are steadily taking to the streets with Signs and/or Bricks in a Protest thinking that they're making some kinda difference are absolute f*cking clowns.

Once a few riots breaks out at these things, which it inevitably will...it won't be long before you lose your right to gather in large groups in Public, and then it won't be long before you lose more rights.

That's the big risk of these things. Aside from the possibility of getting hurt or arrested you're also giving the Authorities potential ammunition to strip you of your freedoms.

The Trump Administration isn't listening to your complaints. Don't waste your breath. Don't strain your wrist drawing on a sign. Don't bother even moving your fingers sending out a Tweet of Complaint about the right thing that this Administration should do....they won't do it.

The people voted for doing the Wrong thing for 4 years, and that's what they're gonna get.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 18 Aug 2026, 21:05
by Baby Face Finster
Deadline of midnight tomorrow for Trump and Canada to come to an agreement over Trump's proposed 50% tariff increase on some Canadian products. If Trump goes through with the increase Canada will retaliate in kind. Shit is about to get real if no deal is made and the cost of living in both countries will drastically rise. President Lump has no clue about the damage he will create for both sides if he follows through with his proposed tariff increase. He thinks he can just keep on bullying everyone:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/new-tr ... -9.7311125

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 19 Aug 2026, 03:36
by Nightmare Roy
Baby Face Finster wrote: 18 Aug 2026, 21:05 Deadline of midnight tomorrow for Trump and Canada to come to an agreement over Trump's proposed 50% tariff increase on some Canadian products. If Trump goes through with the increase Canada will retaliate in kind. Shit is about to get real if no deal is made and the cost of living in both countries will drastically rise. President Lump has no clue about the damage he will create for both sides if he follows through with his proposed tariff increase. He thinks he can just keep on bullying everyone:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/new-tr ... -9.7311125
I'm getting the word "TACO"

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 19 Aug 2026, 07:49
by ironbeard
gilgamesh wrote: 18 Aug 2026, 14:00 Most of the people that voted for Trump the 1st time would've been there happily beating on doors, and threatening to hang Mike Pence on January 6th with 'em if they weren't poor White trash. The reason why more people weren't there is because they're too stupid to be able to read about people organizing things or too poor to afford the gas money/plane ticket to get there.

I think any of the people that are steadily taking to the streets with Signs and/or Bricks in a Protest thinking that they're making some kinda difference are absolute f*cking clowns.

Once a few riots breaks out at these things, which it inevitably will...it won't be long before you lose your right to gather in large groups in Public, and then it won't be long before you lose more rights.

That's the big risk of these things. Aside from the possibility of getting hurt or arrested you're also giving the Authorities potential ammunition to strip you of your freedoms.

The Trump Administration isn't listening to your complaints. Don't waste your breath. Don't strain your wrist drawing on a sign. Don't bother even moving your fingers sending out a Tweet of Complaint about the right thing that this Administration should do....they won't do it.

The people voted for doing the Wrong thing for 4 years, and that's what they're gonna get.
Replace “rights” with “privileges,” as the SCOTUS supermajority did July 1, 2024 in their retroactive interpretation that the Constitution has been a cosplay allowed according to the whim of 250 years of autocrats.

You describe privilege, not rights, in your post. Rights cannot be taken away. According to your post the treasonous SCOTUS supermajority’s interpretation is acceptable.

It is not.

Their decision to interpret rights as privilege nullifies the federal government’s legal/contractual authority to govern, including taxation.

This is lawless fascist dictatorship. We possess no rights if we refrain from exercising them in order to keep them. That inaction conserves our privilege. It is acquiescence to subjection.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 19 Aug 2026, 09:00
by Baby Face Finster
U.S. economic numbers are very bad at the moment as a result of President Lump's tariffs. All the tariffs are having the reverse effect to what he believed would happen. Housing starts are way down and lumber prices are way up because of his tariffs against Canadian softwood lumber. His tariffs on lumber has led to both Canadian and American mills closing and as a result the U.S. is buying lumber from Europe because it's currently cheaper. How retarded is that?

https://www.economist.com/interactive/t ... er/economy

https://www.conference-board.org/topics ... ndicators/

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 19 Aug 2026, 12:54
by Perkin Warbeck
Image

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 19 Aug 2026, 12:57
by bmw hector
There is help if you need it. :wave:


Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 19 Aug 2026, 15:13
by Perkin Warbeck

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 19 Aug 2026, 19:43
by Baby Face Finster
Trump is a total turd. Fuck him and anyone that supports his diaper wearing ass.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 20 Aug 2026, 04:17
by banjo
He wants to bin the EMALS system on new aircraft carriers because it's too complicated and expensive and go back to the cheaper less reliable steam catapult system. :doh:

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 20 Aug 2026, 07:41
by TheRiverCityHippy
banjo wrote: 20 Aug 2026, 04:17 He wants to bin the EMALS system on new aircraft carriers because it's too complicated and expensive and go back to the cheaper less reliable steam catapult system. :doh:
Aircraft carriers are rapidly going the way of the Battleship anyway, drones are rendering them obsolete, plus they are just too big a plum target to sensibly offer the enemy in this day and age, if one of those things went down putting aside the human cost for a minute a ship that size plus all those expensive aircraft you have got to be talking hundreds and hundreds of billions - all potentially easily wiped out with just one hypersonic.
Warfare is going through one of those invention of the gun moments where the rulebook gets ripped up and military planners start again from scratch. Never mind aircraft carriers I'll be surprised if there's even such a thing as soldiers in a few years time, human ones anyway.
Trust us to build two of the fvckers just as they are about to have their day.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 20 Aug 2026, 07:58
by banjo
TheRiverCityHippy wrote: 20 Aug 2026, 07:41
banjo wrote: 20 Aug 2026, 04:17 He wants to bin the EMALS system on new aircraft carriers because it's too complicated and expensive and go back to the cheaper less reliable steam catapult system. :doh:
Aircraft carriers are rapidly going the way of the Battleship anyway, drones are rendering them obsolete, plus they are just too big a plum target to sensibly offer the enemy in this day and age, if one of those things went down putting aside the human cost for a minute a ship that size plus all those expensive aircraft you have got to be talking hundreds and hundreds of billions - all potentially easily wiped out with just one hypersonic.
Warfare is going through one of those invention of the gun moments where the rulebook gets ripped up and military planners start again from scratch. Never mind aircraft carriers I'll be surprised if there's even such a thing as soldiers in a few years time, human ones anyway.
Trust us to build two of the fvckers just as they are about to have their day.
They've said for decades soldiers will be obsolete soon, hasn't happened yet, there's always a place for carriers, a mobile airfield is safer than a stationary one, our lot are looking into launching drones from them. Were also messing with laser weaponry, I think it's called Dragonfire, cost a tenner a shot and can hit a £1 coin almost a mile away.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 20 Aug 2026, 08:16
by banjo
Defence against hypersonic missiles has been around for years, ICBM's are hypersonic missiles.

There is no such thing as a hypersonic anti-ship missile, well there is but by the time they reach their terminal phase they are supersonic at most.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 21 Aug 2026, 17:46
by conan_the_cribber


We have to fun these tax cuts somehow, how about cancelling disability benefits.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 22 Aug 2026, 03:08
by Beltane
80-year-old Dementia Donny is infatuated with his 35-year-old age-care nurse who writes him honey-dripping love letters.

Stock up on microwave popcorn folks. The ‘mad king of Miami’ show will keep getting better from here. This shit going on in the White House, it’s fantastic.

Re: The Turd In Chief Is At It Again!

Posted: 22 Aug 2026, 08:09
by Baby Face Finster
Trade deal with the U.S. falls apart after the U.S. tried to change terms at the last minute. Republicans are going to be hit hard at the midterm elections because of Dementia Donny's attempted shakedown in negotiations:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-u ... -9.7311417