Page 1 of 1
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 18 Apr 2009, 14:45
by hitman_hatton1
great news for him.
any news on scott harrison.
in boxing news about 3 or 4 weeks back they said his trial in spain was starting on april 26th.
no news on the walsh brothers then bigmark.
![[icon_twisted.gif] :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 Apr 2009, 06:57
by Poncey
Sounds lime someone was setting Bradley up. Good to see it wasn't true.
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 Apr 2009, 13:37
by liamlion
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Sounds lime someone was setting Bradley up. Good to see it wasn't true.
Thats one hell of an assumption... are you privy to the prosecution papers?
All being said, its good news for the lad and surely a mighty relief lifted from him.
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 04:26
by SAPFO
Poncey wrote:Sounds lime someone was setting Bradley up. Good to see it wasn't true.
It would cost a small fraction of that to do him more serious damage. So a set-up makes no sense to me.
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 04:53
by Jeff Thomas
Maybe Jessica Fletcher put it there?
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 05:18
by TBONE
if i wanted to set someone up ,i would plant it in the car ,not the garden.....very luck boy .
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 08:08
by n1ebf
who'd be thick enough to walk in Sauders gaden and plant cocaine? I have it from a lad that's been in with some good name and fought for the British title that Saunders is the best he's been in a ring with and expects him to make World Champ.
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 10:06
by SAPFO
Personally, I think it was either his, or holding it for a mate. Who the fornicate would waste 12 grand stitching someone up?
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 12:47
by mickey1975
carlbcfc wrote:Personally, I think it was either his, or holding it for a mate. Who the eff would waste 12 grand stitching someone up?
The 12k will have been worth about 3k to whoever owned it.The Police always exaggerate for effect and go on the price each gram will go for at the end of the supply line.The bulk buyer will get it for a lot less
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 13:41
by J
READ IT WHAT WAS THOUGHT TO BE COCAINE....
could have been anything.
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 14:35
by SAPFO
Even so, 3 grand for a stitch up is still a bit much. Anyone fancy stitching me up? Just leave it round the back, i'll phone the old bill for you
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 16:06
by larry cake
carlbcfc wrote:Personally, I think it was either his, or holding it for a mate. Who the eff would waste 12 grand stitching someone up?
are you a policeman with a grudge?
why bring this topic up again a year after the charges have been dropped?
the bottom line is he has been cleared of any wrong doing, so therfore in the eyes of the law he is innocent.
if he had been charged and subsequently found guilty, and people came on a forum saying that he is innocent, they would be laughed at, and called naive.
Re: CHARGES AGAINST Bradley Saunders dropped
Posted: 20 May 2010, 16:38
by SAPFO
Curiosity. Not a copper by the way.