BoxRec

...would HE be P4P number 1?

no stupid question

if pacman KO'd ali now would he be the greatest ever? nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

deadpan wrote:...would HE be P4P number 1?

Yes.

Isn't that how it works?

If Woking beat Manchester United are they not one of the best teams in Europe?


To answer the real question.

Is Hatton P4P Number 1 if he beats Pacman?

Amy Whinehouse says ( Welcome back you crack ho!).

No,no,no!

pac man isnt p4p no1 anyway its marquez

pac man isnt p4p no1 anyway its marquez

No Pacman is No 1

If Hatton did win and claim to be p4p no 1 he'd probably go down as the worst one in the history of Boxing :)

imo marquez won both fights against pac man

exittored wrote:

pac man isnt p4p no1 anyway its marquez

No Pacman is No 1

If Hatton did win and claim to be p4p no 1 he'd probably go down as the worst one in the history of Boxing :)

He probably would be one of the worst i cant think of another that would be as bad . There probably are but cant think of any now.
I think the idea of p4p is not weight related so if fury fought pac (Obviously hypothetical) he would be handicapped by furys size . The idea of p4p is based on skill , I think , could someone clear this up for me . For example if dlh had beat manny would he have went 1 in the ring rankings? ie the man who beats the man policy

metropol wrote:

exittored wrote:

pac man isnt p4p no1 anyway its marquez

No Pacman is No 1

If Hatton did win and claim to be p4p no 1 he'd probably go down as the worst one in the history of Boxing :)

He probably would be one of the worst i cant think of another that would be as bad . There probably are but cant think of any now.
I think the idea of p4p is not weight related so if fury fought pac (Obviously hypothetical) he would be handicapped by furys size . The idea of p4p is based on skill , I think , could someone clear this up for me . For example if dlh had beat manny would he have went 1 in the ring rankings? ie the man who beats the man policy

i thinks it more on the manner of how they win/lose etc the ring said before th DLH is DLH won but it was close it wouldnt affect manny because he'd jumped so high but if it was a crushin DLH win manny would slip down the rankings and DLH in but not at number 1

That was my original point, albeit presented flippantly. I don’t see that Hatton gets P4P number 1 by beating a man who has generally performed several divisions below him.

Hatton even contradicts his own logic. He claims he lost to PBF because he was fighting outside of his natural division, but feels if he beats Manny, who is clearly boxing out of his, he is the number 1 fighter on the planet.

deadpan wrote:That was my original point, albeit presented flippantly. I don’t see that Hatton get
s P4P number 1 by beating a man who has generally performed several divisions below him.

Hatton even contradicts his own logic. He claims he lost to PBF because he was fighting outside of his natural division, but feels if he beats Manny, who is clearly boxing out of his, he is the number 1 fighter on the planet.

But the way it is looked at is that they both weight in the same so the are the same size , do you get me?

Pacman would stop Fury within 45 seconds.

With a barrage of low blows.

diggler wrote:pac man isnt p4p no1 anyway its marquez

Then I guess when Ricky beats Pac he will be the P4P "ordinary champion" or interim, then when he beats up Marquez, he'll be the P4P "super champion"?

MightyWarrior wrote:

diggler wrote:pac man isnt p4p no1 anyway its marquez

Then I guess when Ricky beats Pac he will be the P4P "ordinary champion" or interim, then when he beats up Marquez, he'll be the P4P "super champion"?

Lol , I think ill give up watching boxing when that day comes

P4P is gimmick. it doesn't mean anything. I wish Hatton would stop banging on about it.

If Mayweather comes back will he not become P4P best

deadpan wrote:With a barrage of low blows.

He'd Knee cap him....

Give Hatton some credit guys ! If he beats Hatton then yes he is number 1 pound for pound in the world ! End of !

cookjason3 wrote:Give Hatton some credit guys ! If he beats Hatton then yes he is number 1 pound for pound in the world ! End of !

Eh?

Hatton beats Hatton?

Hatton is not even top 10!

What a stupid thread... there not even the same weight division. Manny is a welterweight, Fury is a heavyweight... nearly 4 stones difference... some people are so dents.

MRPLOW182 wrote:What a stupid thread... there not even the same weight division. Manny is a welterweight, Fury is a heavyweight... nearly 4 stones difference... some people are so dents.

I'm wondering whether you did that on purpose. You know what. Well, you should.

Asterix wrote:

MRPLOW182 wrote:What a stupid thread... there not even the same weight division. Manny is a welterweight, Fury is a heavyweight... nearly 4 stones difference... some people are so dents.

I'm wondering whether you did that on purpose. You know what. Well, you should.

ok light welter but hes not fort at the weight yet. Still its a big difference and Fury would start favourite because of his reach advantage and uppercuts.

MRPLOW182 wrote:

Asterix wrote:

MRPLOW182 wrote:What a stupid thread... there not even the same weight division. Manny is a welterweight, Fury is a heavyweight... nearly 4 stones difference... some people are so dents.

I'm wondering whether you did that on purpose. You know what. Well, you should.

ok light welter but hes not fort at the weight yet. Still its a big difference and Fury would start favourite because of his reach advantage and uppercuts.

OK, Mr Plow, that's not what I was referring to. I was referring to your "some people are so dents" comment. Dense, not dents. Also, fought, not fort.

I only say to help you.

[quote="Asterix]
OK, Mr Plow, that's not what I was referring to. I was referring to your "some people are so dents" comment. Dense, not dents. Also, fought, not fort.

I only say to help you.[/quote]oh ha ha lol.... my fault. I type faster then calzaghe punches sometimes. teehee. i woz rite about the proposed fury-pacioao match though.... too big, too strong.