BoxRec

Obviously the next fight so who wins ?

U.F.O wrote:Obviously the next fight so who wins ?

No Spoilers please!

Khan, due to the Roach factor

My T Sharp wrote:Khan, due to the Roach factor

Funny thing is khan has stated that (and in caps) HE WILL NEVER FIGHT HATTON , Maybe but if this fight happens surely there has to be questions asked about integrity? No.

It would make sense for Ricky as one last big payday, and also getting Khan signed under his promotional banner.

Khan is probably the only guy out there other than Mayweather with comparable speed to Pacquiao. He doesn't use it like he does but it would cause Hatton problems. I'd still say Hatton would win it because of Khan's chin. I'd probably need to see how Khan does against Kotelnik before calling it. That would show how he handles top level.

Khan would land on Hatton easier than Pacquiao due to his reach. With the inclusion of the Roach/Moorer factor, Khan wins this, and early.

Unless Khan loses to Kotelnik, I should add.

The battle of the dad-influenced fighters. Shah Khan vs Ray Hatton!!

Boxingmad wrote:The battle of the dad-influenced fighters. Shah Khan vs Ray Hatton!!

A fight between hatton and mcloskey might be better than a fight between two failures( meant in the nicest way possible),

it would be big business. hatton won't be the same now. khan may raise himself vs kotelnik.

metropol wrote:A fight between hatton and mcloskey might be better than a fight between two failures( meant in the nicest way possible),

You say meant in the nicest way possible, but how in anyway shape or form is Hatton a failure also Khan for the that matter ?

Khan has a very tough fight vs. Kotelnik to get through first. I honestly don't see this happening.

sky want to keep milking their 2 PPV fghters, it could happen

metropol wrote:A fight between hatton and mcloskey might be better than a fight between two failures( meant in the nicest way possible),

So put an alleged "failure" in against a guy who will never even contend let alone get the chance to become a failure at that level?

The little rotund chap from Manchester arguably achieved more than any Irish fighter in history!

Am I in the twilight zone? Its unreal how highly some here still rate Amir Khan. No real wins, no chin, no stiff opp... Yet he now beats Hatton???

metropol wrote:A fight between hatton and mcloskey might be better than a fight between two failures( meant in the nicest way possible),

Good lord, you been on the ale lad? Hattons two losses have been to two men who were regarded by many as the best fighter on the planet. The way people are banging on it's as if he's just been flattened by some bum.

Ive heard that b4 this fight Hatton had earned over £30 million, no doubt you can stick an extra £10 million, maybe even more on that after last night. So i seriously can't see Hatton fighting Khan, it would have zero selling power outside of the uk and i could only see Hatton fighting on for a serious pay day which to be honest i can't see coming from anywhere now. IMO Hatton will call it a day now.

I think Hatton would win Kahn wouldnt deal with power and Kahn doesnt have the power to keep him off

mark thompson wrote:

metropol wrote:A fight between hatton and mcloskey might be better than a fight between two failures( meant in the nicest way possible),

You say meant in the nicest way possible, but how in anyway shape or form is Hatton a failure also Khan for the that matter ?

Sorry i shouldnt of said it of khan and maybe i put it wrong but hatton made 2 stand out step ups as he puts it had 2 chances to become the best in the world and failed

They deserve each other.

banjo wrote:

metropol wrote:A fight between hatton and mcloskey might be better than a fight between two failures( meant in the nicest way possible),

Good lord, you been on the ale lad? Hattons two losses have been to two men who were regarded by many as the best fighter on the planet. The way people are banging on it's as if he's just been flattened by some bum.

Sorry i was pissed had been out at the leinster - munster game and was on the ale all day

metropol wrote:

banjo wrote:

metropol wrote:A fight between hatton and mcloskey might be better than a fight between two failures( meant in the nicest way possible),

Good lord, you been on the ale lad? Hattons two losses have been to two men who were regarded by many as the best fighter on the planet. The way people are banging on it's as if he's just been flattened by some bum.

Sorry i was pissed had been out at the leinster - munster game and was on the ale all day

oh yeah I remember you saying now mate.

MrSquizz wrote:

kojebee wrote:Hatton V Khan anyone?

I can see it on the marquee now: "Battle of the China-chinned hype jobs!"

I'm all for it: Let's see who has the weakest chin in all of Britain!

Agree?

be a very interesting fight imo,
Got to be either Hatton by K.O or Kahn by stoppage due to cuts