Page 1 of 1
was hatton pacman for ring LWW title?
Posted: 03 May 2009, 06:03
by sgtcecil
was talking about this with my mate and i didnt think it was but sure i saw manny hold the belt after the fight. for a fight to be for a ring mag title, dont both the boxers need to be in the top 3 of the ring rankings? pacman wasnt in the ring LWW rankings so i thought that it shouldnt have been for the ring title (pacman 5 in ring WW rankings)
Re: was hatton pacman for ring LWW title?
Posted: 03 May 2009, 07:42
by DannyP72
I'm pretty sure the belt goes to whomever beats the previous holder. The both top 3 in the rankings rule is only for vacant belts.
Re: was hatton pacman for ring LWW title?
Posted: 03 May 2009, 08:28
by metropol
I think its just the man who beats the man no matter where hes ranked
Re: was hatton pacman for ring LWW title?
Posted: 03 May 2009, 08:39
by banjo
According to this yes -
http://www.ringtv.com/blog/
The ratings haven't been updated yet though.
Re: was hatton pacman for ring LWW title?
Posted: 03 May 2009, 10:35
by sgtcecil
cheers for clearing that up
Re: was hatton pacman for ring LWW title?
Posted: 03 May 2009, 12:16
by RLewis
Yes it was