de la hoya cant be too bad
Posted: 04 May 2009, 13:16
oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering how hard we now no he can punch
Are you saying i didn't know how hard manny could punch before hand ?gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
dont think pacmans never stopped know one like that b4 he's got freaky strengh & can dig but hatton flatterd him massively.gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
I was thinking that Pacman's slaughter of Hatton might make ODLH think that he's not that bad after all & hasten a return to the ring!gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
I hope not he would just tarnish his record and may get hurt no point in him returningSyntax Error wrote:I was thinking that Pacman's slaughter of Hatton might make ODLH think that he's not that bad after all & hasten a return to the ring!gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
No... but i did not think he had as hard a punch that knocked hatton out, i have seen very few punchs as perfect as thatFinch wrote:Are you saying i didn't know how hard manny could punch before hand ?gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
I wouldn't have thought many knew Manny could spark out world class Light-Welterweights with proven chins inside 2 rounds.Finch wrote:Are you saying i didn't know how hard manny could punch before hand ?gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
does this mean they might try and resurrect the idea of Hatton v de la Hoya!!!Syntax Error wrote:I was thinking that Pacman's slaughter of Hatton might make ODLH think that he's not that bad after all & hasten a return to the ring!gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
Don't give him any ideas!!!punchers chance wrote:does this mean they might try and resurrect the idea of Hatton v de la Hoya!!!Syntax Error wrote:I was thinking that Pacman's slaughter of Hatton might make ODLH think that he's not that bad after all & hasten a return to the ring!gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
Don't be dense.DG. wrote:DLh was always able to take a punch.
He said Pacman does not hit hard!!
Hatton has lost hs punch resistance and coupled with the fact he has not evolved one bit he was prime to get STRETCHED!
Carbo wrote:Don't be dense.DG. wrote:DLh was always able to take a punch.
He said Pacman does not hit hard!!
Hatton has lost hs punch resistance and coupled with the fact he has not evolved one bit he was prime to get STRETCHED!
DLH could always take a punch, which is true, but he was battered from pillar to post.
I have no idea how you can say Hatton has lost his punch resistance, but I don't want to turn this thread into a retread of the other. You gave up on that one, so I suggest you take your argument there.
Hatton's punch resistence MAY have started to slide, but all other indicators suggest it's still there to some extent.
You're the only person here belittling Pacquiao's achievment by trying to imply it was against some bum, who didn't belong in the same ring and who had lost all punch resistance.
Most of us real boxing fans are in awe at Pacquiao's power, skill and agression.
OH well, a boxer said he was never hurt. Ooookkkaaaayyy.. I stand corrected.DG. wrote:Carbo wrote:Don't be dense.DG. wrote:DLh was always able to take a punch.
He said Pacman does not hit hard!!
Hatton has lost hs punch resistance and coupled with the fact he has not evolved one bit he was prime to get STRETCHED!
DLH could always take a punch, which is true, but he was battered from pillar to post.
I have no idea how you can say Hatton has lost his punch resistance, but I don't want to turn this thread into a retread of the other. You gave up on that one, so I suggest you take your argument there.
Hatton's punch resistence MAY have started to slide, but all other indicators suggest it's still there to some extent.
You're the only person here belittling Pacquiao's achievment by trying to imply it was against some bum, who didn't belong in the same ring and who had lost all punch resistance.
Most of us real boxing fans are in awe at Pacquiao's power, skill and agression.
I gave up?It was like me hitting my head against a brick wall, I was bored.
Hatton can not take the punches like he could 5 years ago.
Fact.
Most of us real boxing fans??
I am as real as they come.
Pacman is fast and powerful, but he has never knocked ot ANYONE lke that in hs life.
Oscar said he was never hurt!
lol I was thinking that too, I'm sure that pacman just goes easy on the kid. Probably works more on speed elements than power shots vs Khan.Mat 30 wrote:Slightly off topic but how good must Khan's chin be coming along surviving any time sparring with the big punching Pac Man.
Maybe it is but he hasnt sparred this time and im not sure how hard he hits in sparring also im sure freddy wouldnt want to dent khans confidence further by having him on his arse in sparringMat 30 wrote:Slightly off topic but how good must Khan's chin be coming along surviving any time sparring with the big punching Pac Man.
gunners9191 wrote:oscar must have shown a lot of heart lasting 8 round with manny considering has hard we now no he can punch
Carbo wrote:Don't be dense.DG. wrote:DLh was always able to take a punch.
He said Pacman does not hit hard!!
Hatton has lost hs punch resistance and coupled with the fact he has not evolved one bit he was prime to get STRETCHED!
DLH could always take a punch, which is true, but he was battered from pillar to post.
I have no idea how you can say Hatton has lost his punch resistance, but I don't want to turn this thread into a retread of the other. You gave up on that one, so I suggest you take your argument there.
Hatton's punch resistence MAY have started to slide, but all other indicators suggest it's still there to some extent.
You're the only person here belittling Pacquiao's achievment by trying to imply it was against some bum, who didn't belong in the same ring and who had lost all punch resistance.
Most of us real boxing fans are in awe at Pacquiao's power, skill and agression.