Page 1 of 2

Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 21 May 2009, 16:31
by Poncey
Who wins?

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 21 May 2009, 16:37
by The_Don1
I'm betting Guzman struggles to make weight, pulls out shortly before the fight and announces his move up to welterweight, patterns repeats itself until he eventually settles at super middleweight.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 21 May 2009, 16:38
by crusader
He's already done that. I have a hunch that Sakio Bika is actually Joan Guzman

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 21 May 2009, 16:50
by Poncey
Nah, Guzman's woman doesn't look like a man.
Image

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 21 May 2009, 16:55
by KNOCKOUT KING
..........

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 21 May 2009, 18:43
by Wales
Guzman UD, great fighter, wasted talent.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 21 May 2009, 19:24
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Wow huge Guzman fan, been very impressed with Bradley too who might just be a sleeping giant himself. No idea how Guzman will handle 140 but he's weighed 147 on fight night looking in good condition so I'll stick my neck out and say he handles it well, realises its his last big shot and come in great shape. Guzman is the superior boxer, so:

Guzman UD 8-4 (if its fair judging)

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 21 May 2009, 19:31
by RLewis
Bradley beats him out of sight

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 22 May 2009, 04:15
by Counter-puncher
agree RLewis. tho i am biased towards bradley. i like him.

Guzman is the more skilled but he's going to be fighting someone bigger and more relentless than anyone he's yet seen. he'll be ringrusty and its not the fight to be getting over that.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 22 May 2009, 05:18
by Old bones Ian
Guzman won't turn up

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 22 May 2009, 05:37
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Its been rejected by the WBO, TWATS

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 22 May 2009, 06:02
by Counter-puncher
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Its been rejected by the WBO, TWATS
haha. thats the definition of irony.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 22 May 2009, 10:44
by jameswilson
Counter-puncher wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Its been rejected by the WBO, TWATS
haha. thats the definition of irony.
It sure is.

They don't want this but they will accept Enzo Maccrinelli vs Bobby Gunn.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 22 May 2009, 14:03
by Autobarn
hopefully it'll be juan diaz v guzman, which was in the rumour mill recently. then we might see guzman get a bit of a beating, as diaz can get on top of a fighter pretty quickly.

not sure what guzman would have been like at 140. (i think he went over lightweight limit once and was very slappy and negative, v jauregei?). bradley is nothing special and doesn't hit any harder than many 135-pounders. bradley-guzman was not a fight i wanted to happen, so i won't complain about this.

WBO could have sanctioned bradley-guzman - guzman potentially could have become a "4 weight world champion" (all WBO titles, whihc makes you wonder why they didn't go for it).

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 09 Jun 2009, 13:04
by DG.
Guzmans mother just passed away according to fiight news.

Very sad.

RIP.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 09 Jun 2009, 13:20
by Chambers2
RIP


Guzman's a special fighter IMO, he'd box Bradleys ears off blindfolded

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 10 Jun 2009, 10:09
by DG.
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Nah, Guzman's woman doesn't look like a man.
Image
Seeing as that picture is of Sakio Bikanand his woman it is hard to tell!

Or are you saying Bika's woman looks like a man?

:lol:

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 10 Jun 2009, 10:20
by Asterix
Guzman, on his day, is a fantastic boxer. I can see an argument for either boxer winning. I hope that it's Bradley, though, as I hate Guzman's style.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 10 Jun 2009, 15:41
by caffrey
guzman would outbox anyone apart from the very best,he has truly outstanding skills . By all acounts he has a poor attitude in regards to training and preparation hence his weight making antics.I dont think he ll have the opportunity to prove how good he is.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 11 Jun 2009, 15:41
by Captain Hook
Guzman is way, way better than Bradley IMO

Sad news about his mum..

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 11 Jun 2009, 19:30
by briantracy09
That bird is pig ugly.

I think Guzman will play with Bradley and KO him easy. Brad was pretty shaken up by Holt. Guzman is in another league entirely.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 12 Jun 2009, 04:25
by Counter-puncher
am i right in saying Guzman hasn't KO'd anyone in about his last 10 fights though, or at least since he went north of 122lbs.....?

EDIT: yes i am right. i thought so.

it's always confused me the confidence people have shown in Guzman stopping various mooted opponents over the last 2 years, though the fact that Guzman never actually makes the fight makes them easy predictions to make with little chance of being proved wrong.

ok so he may be streets ahead of bradley skillwise, but in terms of fitness, attitude, etc bradley has him there i think.

and so what, if Holt had Bradley on the deck? Holt's a big puncher, who actually has knockouts of people bigger than Agapito fricken Sanchez on his record, Bradley ran into a cracking left hook, and was up and fighting back in short order.

i think Bradley would do this on workrate and pressure, when Guzman's 35 punches a round don't stop him or have him backing off he'll end up taking rounds just like he did off Witter, IMO.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 12 Jun 2009, 04:35
by jamesmcdonnell
Bridge too far for Guzman, if he had discipline he wouldn't be fighting at 140.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 12 Jun 2009, 07:12
by harrygreb
bradley has impressed me too. he wins convincingly.

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Posted: 12 Jun 2009, 07:44
by Asterix
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Bridge too far for Guzman, if he had discipline he wouldn't be fighting at 140.
I'm not so sure it's all because of discipline. He seems like one of those fighters who drained so much that he's now jumping up weight divisions quickly because his body won't accept anything else (just like with Pacquiao, whose body forced him up to lightweight, and even at lightweight he was a big drainer!)