Page 1 of 1

Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 07:44
by Old bones Ian
Mitchells opponent tonight is Lanquaye Wilson a superbantam, i've seen a few different records for him, around the 6-3 mark.

But will be a huge weight difference i think, shouldn't be allowed. Its not as if there are no superfeathers around

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 07:48
by Dioufy
Fecking WBO - this fight should've been an eliminator for a shot at the champ.

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 07:52
by Counter-puncher
nowt to do with your favourite sanctioning body mate, this is strictly a tuneup/ get riod of the cobwebs fight as far as i know

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 07:54
by Dioufy
I'm not really talking about this fight, as it is a joke itself. I am just venting my frustration that Mitchell, who I really like, gets a shot at the main belt without having done much above British level. This is a perfect time for an eliminator to fight Martinez.

WarrenBoxingOrganisation.

Haye was spot on.

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 07:58
by Old bones Ian
Well lets hope Lanquaye Wilson has not actually got the record held on Boxrec, as his last fight was over 2 years ago.

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 07:59
by Counter-puncher
Dioufy wrote:I'm not really talking about this fight, as it is a joke itself. I am just venting my frustration that Mitchell, who I really like, gets a shot at the main belt without having done much above British level. This is a perfect time for an eliminator to fight Martinez.

WarrenBoxingOrganisation.

Haye was spot on.
aah i get you. well he wouldn't have fought the eliminator without a warmup anyway so you were still barking up the wrong tree :lol: :wink:

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 08:01
by Dioufy
Then he shouldn't get a shot at a 'world title' then. Mitchell would have done absolutely nothing to earn that shot. If Mitchell feels he needs a warm-up then fine, but that has to be a warm-up to an eliminator, not a freaking world title shot.

I wonder if I can get myself to be mandated for a shot if Mitchell does win?

:roll:

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 08:06
by Counter-puncher
Dioufy wrote:
I wonder if I can get myself to be mandated for a shot if Mitchell does win?

:roll:
not if its your time of the month likeit seems today no promoters would want to deal with you :lol:

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 08:12
by Coco
Dioufy wrote:Then he shouldn't get a shot at a 'world title' then. Mitchell would have done absolutely nothing to earn that shot. If Mitchell feels he needs a warm-up then fine, but that has to be a warm-up to an eliminator, not a freaking world title shot.

I wonder if I can get myself to be mandated for a shot if Mitchell does win?

:roll:
I don't think there would be a big enough reward/risk ratio for FW!

Re: Kevin Mitchell v Super Bantam

Posted: 22 May 2009, 08:14
by Dioufy
I'm not angry, not at the WBO anyways. I am waaay past that stage - FRANCISCO VALCARCEL (if he is the president) better watch his back.

:roll: