Page 1 of 1
EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 28 May 2009, 17:35
by andyscottboxing
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 28 May 2009, 19:12
by oilup
38 views, lol.
Nobody cares about this FNF farce.
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 28 May 2009, 20:42
by whicker
Well, it could be a good fight. Who knows until it happens?
They have Sutherland on the undercard, and also Sykes V Crolla will be a good fight.
Rest of the undercard, not very sure about to be honest - nothing stands out at all.
Is this a dinner show? They offer boxing only £35, or boxing and dinner £75.
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 28 May 2009, 20:55
by oilup
whicker wrote:Well, it could be a good fight. Who knows until it happens?
They have Sutherland on the undercard, and also Sykes V Crolla will be a good fight.
Rest of the undercard, not very sure about to be honest - nothing stands out at all.
Is this a dinner show? They offer boxing only £35, or boxing and dinner £75.
Ah yes, Sutherland against another no hoper, really wets the appetite that.
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 03:58
by Night-Nurse
Theres a good 6 rounder between Lee Selby and Samir Mounamire, dont think Smair really shown as a pro yet but this could bring out the best in him!
Should be an entertaining affair!
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 04:40
by Londonirish
Ahmed, Lunnlatic
Going to be an easy fight for Edwars imo...
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 08:36
by THEBUTCH
Ahmed gave Edwards some torrid moments and that was on Ahmeds' debut and has improved since then, but so too has Edwards. It could well be competitive for 4 or 5 rounds, but you would then expect the vastly more seasoned Edwards to take over.
I'm sure this will be an improvement on Edwards-Bloy because Ahmed has got more fire in his belly and will keep trying even when the tank's empty.
No wonder this title fight is getting so much stick from the posters on here. Despite the lack of depth at 8st, Ahmed should have at least boxed for an Area, English title or eliminator first. He simply has no credentials to be boxing for a British title.
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 08:42
by bombhead
I think Crolla v Sykes will be a quality fight, should be a good 50/50 scrap!
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 08:43
by Night-Nurse
Agreed...Sykes been in top form in gym, best ive seen in last 2 years!
Reports are crolla has been the same....so im expecting fight of night!
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 08:58
by TerribleTerry
bombhead wrote:I think Crolla v Sykes will be a quality fight, should be a good 50/50 scrap!
Cracking fight - British boxing needs these sort of cross roads fights for young prospects. Looking forward to this more than the main event

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 09:07
by Fearful_Freddie
What language is Edwards speaking? I hardly understood any of that.
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 09:11
by bombhead
TerribleTerry wrote:bombhead wrote:I think Crolla v Sykes will be a quality fight, should be a good 50/50 scrap!
Cracking fight - British boxing needs these sort of cross roads fights for young prospects. Looking forward to this more than the main event

Will definetely be fight of the night, could be one of the domestic fights of the year. Really looking forward to this one!!
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 29 May 2009, 13:05
by BigEars
THEBUTCH wrote:No wonder this title fight is getting so much stick from the posters on here. Despite the lack of depth at 8st, Ahmed should have at least boxed for an Area, English title or eliminator first. He simply has no credentials to be boxing for a British title.
Especially so when you consider his win over Wilton was a gift !
Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE
Posted: 01 Jun 2009, 08:45
by THEBUTCH
Well, well.....Ahmed gave that a bloody good go. He couldn't have tried any harder.
I still say he didn't deserve his shot, but 10/10 for effort.