Page 1 of 1
Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 09:34
by Lenny
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog ... d-football
Bunce's emailed comeback is published on the second page of comments. Clearly not everyone is a fan
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 09:57
by DavidPayne
She's a condescending broad int she.
Some of what she says has some truth, but when they come to collect her desk in five years because the Guardian has gone on line and is now staffed entirely by Amateur bloggers who communicate only through 140 character articles, she may seek to recall her glee at Setanta's downfall and wonder if she could have shown more restrain or even acted karma.
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 10:06
by Counter-puncher
re bunce:
He's under a lot of pressure though, upholding the weight and fate of all boxing coverage in this country on his shoulders like some misogynistic Atlas.
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 11:16
by winkveron
She's a bit angry. Clearly not getting any in the bedroom me thinks!
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 11:53
by Punchy Joe
oh yer and Sky coverage is so much better is it? they just were their first thats all, sentanta gave it a good go..... what a nasty little bitch, she's no where near the witty little putdowner she thinks she is, just cos she writes for the Guardian she thinks she's something,
Fecking dog.
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 11:59
by caffrey
writing for the guardian is nothing to brag about
out of touch paper for out of touch people
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 12:09
by Rocky Balboa
winkveron wrote:She's a bit angry. Clearly not getting any in the bedroom me thinks!
Or its that time of the month! Has to be one fo the two, LOL!
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 12:55
by Chambers2
What a load of drivel, she's so far up her own arse her moustache is tickling her tonsils.
I've had 2 goes at reading the full article, but I keep slipping into a coma around the 3rd paragraph
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 13:16
by Punchy Joe
Rocky Balboa wrote:winkveron wrote:She's a bit angry. Clearly not getting any in the bedroom me thinks!
Or its that time of the month! Has to be one fo the two, LOL!
yes she needs a good seeing to alright, preferably up the dot. And yes i am a Daily Sport reading sexist misogynist
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 13:28
by caffrey
Punchy Joe wrote:Rocky Balboa wrote:winkveron wrote:She's a bit angry. Clearly not getting any in the bedroom me thinks!
Or its that time of the month! Has to be one fo the two, LOL!
yes she needs a good seeing to alright, preferably up the dot.
And yes i am a Daily Sport reading sexist misogynist
me too and damn proud
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 13:33
by Twinkle Toes
Named after the car she was conceived in.
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 28 Jun 2009, 05:59
by McCannW14
She thought she could have a pop at the Setanta. Its easy to kick someone when they are down.
What has she ever acheived? Does she have a following? In fact, who the fcuk is she? Ive never heard of her.
Her comeback email to Buncey showed she is a smug cow and she stooped low enough to insult Buncey personally.
This shows what a poor journalist she is.
Do yourself a favour Marina or Allegro or whatever your name is, stop writing about Boxing. Better still stop writing full stop.
When the new Bunceys Boxing Hour is on, she has got to be in for some special treatment.
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 28 Jun 2009, 07:24
by steve689
The Guardian seem to think something of her as she occupies quite a lot of their printed column space; seems she's moved her vitriol online now! Some of her stuff to be fair is okay and she sometimes tackles the political spectrum. No matter what she writes, it often includes big words, grand sentences and is always having a go at somebody
If you see a photo Hyde then I think you all would do her...
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 28 Jun 2009, 07:43
by whiskey
She needs a spit roasting.
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 28 Jun 2009, 07:49
by chinny
she is more famous for sucking piers morgans c0ck than any of the tripe she's written
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 28 Jun 2009, 08:32
by Spud
BIGMARK wrote:Here is the Bunce email:
I noticed your little pop today. Very witty.
Just to let you know that on the boxing front Setanta is a tremendous success. Many classic fights from the last two years have so far been screened, trust me. Cotto v Margarito...ring any bells? Yeah, like it would.
The weekly show, called Steve Bunce's Boxing Hour, is essential for the 100,000 plus boxing nuts who sit and watch. It's a lot more than find your column, sweetheart.
Also, each week over 4,000 boxing emails and texts arrive - our record is 6,000 in one 24 hour period. Boxing fans are a devoted mob and the hundreds that emailed me your little pop will be watching today.
Adios.
Bunce.
i think there has been a bit of history between these two in the past, good come back though
If it was me - I would have ended Buncey's email with the words - "F*ck off you stupid ignorant cow" - its not so I wasn't given that opportunity - or can I?? - how do I get hold of the stupid ****!!!
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 29 Jun 2009, 11:28
by unorthodox
slag.
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 29 Jun 2009, 15:19
by Captain Hook
unorthodox wrote:slag.
:)
Well said, and agreed
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 29 Jun 2009, 17:08
by Neil Jones Jnr
what was her comeback to Bunce's email ?
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 30 Jun 2009, 00:43
by Carbo
You see, she calls boxing fans and Bunce misogynistic, and I think, "condescending cow."
Then I read, "she's clearly not getting it" and "she needs spit roasting."
Oh dear.
Meantime, I don't really like her writing.
It seems to me that it's trying very hard to achieve a certain tone, but doesn't quite make it.
Re: Bunce v Hyde
Posted: 30 Jun 2009, 07:49
by carrotcruncher
steve689 wrote:The Guardian seem to think something of her as she occupies quite a lot of their printed column space; seems she's moved her vitriol online now! Some of her stuff to be fair is okay and she sometimes tackles the political spectrum. No matter what she writes, it often includes big words, grand sentences and is always having a go at somebody
If you see a photo Hyde then I think you all would do her...
rumoured the sports editor knows her well