Page 1 of 1

Better Card?

Posted: 18 Jul 2009, 19:28
by alexpaterson
ITV-Hennessy Cleverly vs McIntosh, Glover-Thaxton, Fury-The Giant, The Woman

SKY-FW Khan vs Kotelnik, Olypmpians, Small vs Hall

Which was the better bill?

Re: Better Card?

Posted: 18 Jul 2009, 19:34
by WayoftheCass
Considering Brock, Enzo Mac and Mitchell were all on the undercard to plus Thaxton and Fury were up against supposed no-hoper journeymen I think you have to give this one to Sky hand down. :TU:

Re: Better Card?

Posted: 18 Jul 2009, 19:42
by crusader
Sky>ITV

Two female bumbs, an over the hill Thaxton, and Tyson Fury against a no hoper is pretty easy to beat.

Khan vs Kotelnik was decent, and the drama was always there with Khans chin and the title on the line. Small vs Hall was competitive and the ending was quick and explosive. And the Olympians all gave us a look at the next batch off world class British fighters (At least in my view).

Cleverly's fight was ok but it doesn't make up for the others.

Re: Better Card?

Posted: 18 Jul 2009, 19:47
by alexpaterson
I thought SKY would be miles better but all the Olympians were bound to win Hall-Small was poor for 4 rounds then came alive when the cut happened and it opened the fight up also Khan-Kotelnik was brilliant Khan was dazzling but ITV had the more competitive bill imo Glover-Thaxton was a great watch very entertaining Glover was blood and guts and deserved his win also Cleverly-McIntosh was good but Clev was in a diffrent league. Fury wasnt much cope though. Both good billsI prefered the ITV

Re: Better Card?

Posted: 18 Jul 2009, 20:15
by brian13
Sky's was better

Re: Better Card?

Posted: 18 Jul 2009, 20:23
by TheCobra
Sky was better but they showed the wrong fights, why not Brook and Macc, stupid and annoying, why do I need to see the olympians beating up journeymen instead of proper fighters at more advanced stages of their career in much mbetter matches.