Page 1 of 3

Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 26 Jul 2009, 17:33
by lirva
I was very young when this fight happened but remember watching it. Don't remember too much of it but I was talking to a friend of mine who said Eubank had the fight there for the taking in the 10th round when he had Collins down but didn't push on. My mate basically said Eubank could have easily won the fight there and would have done if not for the Watson experience.

It's not on youtube. Can anybody confirm this??

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 26 Jul 2009, 17:43
by Deserter
lirva wrote:I was very young when this fight happened but remember watching it. Don't remember too much of it but I was talking to a friend of mine who said Eubank had the fight there for the taking in the 10th round when he had Collins down but didn't push on. My mate basically said Eubank could have easily won the fight there and would have done if not for the Watson experience.

It's not on youtube. Can anybody confirm this??
There's definitely some truth in that. Collins won the fight fair and square, but it did appear that Eubank could have finished it in the 10th - whether that can be attributed to the Watson incident or just that he didn't have enough 'gas in the tank' at that stage of the fight is open to debate, as it should be noted that Collins set a fierce pace from the opening bell and Eubank always struggled in that scenario - as evidenced in the Watson fight, despite the awful outcome.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 26 Jul 2009, 19:38
by lirva
would be great if someone could slap it on youtube or something!

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 26 Jul 2009, 23:52
by Badass
lirva wrote:would be great if someone could slap it on youtube or something!
Why don't you just buy a copy of the fight instead of asking people to put it up on youtube?

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 00:04
by lirva
Badass wrote:
lirva wrote:would be great if someone could slap it on youtube or something!
Why don't you just buy a copy of the fight instead of asking people to put it up on youtube?
It's cheaper. I'm a student.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 03:15
by ERIC GUY
then you will be waiting a long time till you see it I would think

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 16:13
by Deserter
feargalocuinneagain wrote::box: Collins had a granite chin. He was smiling when that fool dropped him to the canvas. Collins was in no danger!!
:roll: :roll:

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 18:09
by knowitall
feargalocuinneagain wrote::box: Collins had a granite chin. He was smiling when that fool dropped him to the canvas. Collins was in no danger!!
:TU: I have this on dvd. There was no time in this fight when Collins was even near to being stopped. This is just typical crap that English fans say to make themselves feel better about Eubank losing.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 18:41
by Hagler2002
feargalocuinneagain wrote::box: Collins had a granite chin. He was smiling when that fool dropped him to the canvas. Collins was in no danger!!
I've just watched it and he certainly went on his bike after the knockdown so to say he was in no danger in nonsense.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 18:56
by slapbangwhallop
knowitall wrote:
feargalocuinneagain wrote::box: Collins had a granite chin. He was smiling when that fool dropped him to the canvas. Collins was in no danger!!
:TU: I have this on dvd. There was no time in this fight when Collins was even near to being stopped. This is just typical crap that English fans say to make themselves feel better about Eubank losing.
stup up you - Eubank was washed up and past it when Collin beat him *cough*twice*cough* - and so was Benn!! :lol: :lol:

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 19:00
by banjo
sligobhoy67 wrote:
knowitall wrote:
feargalocuinneagain wrote::box: Collins had a granite chin. He was smiling when that fool dropped him to the canvas. Collins was in no danger!!
:TU: I have this on dvd. There was no time in this fight when Collins was even near to being stopped. This is just typical crap that English fans say to make themselves feel better about Eubank losing.
stup up you - Eubank was washed up and past it when Collin beat him *cough*twice*cough* - and so was Benn!! :lol: :lol:
Actually Benn was shot to shit, that had been obvious since the McLellan fight. Both wins over Eubank were good though although a couple of other fighters could have had a good claim to beating him before Collins did.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 19:11
by slapbangwhallop
banjo wrote:
sligobhoy67 wrote:
knowitall wrote:
:TU: I have this on dvd. There was no time in this fight when Collins was even near to being stopped. This is just typical crap that English fans say to make themselves feel better about Eubank losing.
stup up you - Eubank was washed up and past it when Collin beat him *cough*twice*cough* - and so was Benn!! :lol: :lol:
Actually Benn was shot to poop, that had been obvious since the McLellan fight. Both wins over Eubank were good though although a couple of other fighters could have had a good claim to beating him before Collins did.
stop joining in on the bandwagon that is the biggest myth around (apart from John Duddy was hyped)!

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 20:05
by hitman_hatton1
a little like the thompson fight he didn't put the pedal down the way he should have.

collins was in some shit.

not seen those 2 fights for ages now. :o

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 06:40
by Autobarn
Benn v Eubank and Eubank v Watson were way above domestic fights.

Eubank didn't fight much international comp, but he was in some epic world class battles such as Benn 1, Watson 2, Thompson 1. These fights were more lucrative and classier than, say, Hall v Small or Mitchell v Johanesson (even though I love this latter fight).

I'd call Arthur-Foster Jr a glorified domestic fight without hesistation, but not the Eubank-Benn-Watson fights.

I'd never call Benn just a domestic fighter, as he won his 2 titles away from home, beat the likes of DeWitt, McClellan and Barkley, improved to a draw in Eubank rematch. When Toney took 10 rounds to beat Barkley (9 rds longer than Benn), it made Toney a top 2 "pound for pounder."


Eubank should have been light heavy by the time of the Collins fights. Didn't have the temperament or stamina. Due to funny attitude and bad habits of long time WBO champ, Collins survived and won. Collins had good not great career. OK he beats old Benn and Eubank, but same thing would have happened to him had the Calzaghe fight been made rather than the likes of Craig Cummins...Dem Oirish, dey tink dat Collins was great. But woiy was he defending his turtle vs Craig Cummings? Woi was his getting knocked down by Cummins?

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 07:15
by Autobarn
Traitor!

These fights were big events and I'm not sure that anyone really cared about the likes of, say, Michael Nunn v Frankie Liles or Hopkins v Mercado.

Eubank v Watson 1 was definitely poor: scrappy and both guys weight drained. I see Eubank as a guy whose title fights weren't "regulated" properly in terms of quality, allowing him to get away with too many bad mistakes. Benn did beat one of the Yanks who was in favour, McClellan.

Eubank would have possibly been an excellent light heavyweight but hey, the Germans had the WBO title. Benn and Eubank were champs when Jones was fighting guys with made up records and when Toney was only just getting the better of Sanderline Williams.

I'm not sure British fans got overexcited about the fights mentioned. Benn and Euabnk had the right ingredients - in and out the ring - to justify their stage.

Definitely, Lewis was the gold standard of British boxing. He won the biggest prize, took part in the biggest fights.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 08:51
by ApolloCreed
But woiy was he defending his turtle
Pathetic.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 09:00
by mickey1975
Autobarn wrote:Benn v Eubank and Eubank v Watson were way above domestic fights.

Eubank didn't fight much international comp, but he was in some epic world class battles such as Benn 1, Watson 2, Thompson 1. These fights were more lucrative and classier than, say, Hall v Small or Mitchell v Johanesson (even though I love this latter fight).

I'd call Arthur-Foster Jr a glorified domestic fight without hesistation, but not the Eubank-Benn-Watson fights.

I'd never call Benn just a domestic fighter, as he won his 2 titles away from home, beat the likes of DeWitt, McClellan and Barkley, improved to a draw in Eubank rematch. When Toney took 10 rounds to beat Barkley (9 rds longer than Benn), it made Toney a top 2 "pound for pounder."


Eubank should have been light heavy by the time of the Collins fights. Didn't have the temperament or stamina. Due to funny attitude and bad habits of long time WBO champ, Collins survived and won. Collins had good not great career. OK he beats old Benn and Eubank, but same thing would have happened to him had the Calzaghe fight been made rather than the likes of Craig Cummins...Dem Oirish, dey tink dat Collins was great. But woiy was he defending his turtle vs Craig Cummings? Woi was his getting knocked down by Cummins?
benn was clearly a world class fighter.as were eubank,watson and collins.the arthur-foster bout just doesent compare.as time passes,people will appreciate how good our super middles were.im not saying they were all timers,but they were very,very good fighters

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 09:38
by Autobarn
ApolloCreed wrote:
But woiy was he defending his turtle
Pathetic.
well, so was a title fight with craig cummings, and getting knocked down by him to boot

wins over eubank and benn are good, but it was hardly aglorious title run, was it?

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 09:40
by Autobarn
mickey1975 wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Benn v Eubank and Eubank v Watson were way above domestic fights.

Eubank didn't fight much international comp, but he was in some epic world class battles such as Benn 1, Watson 2, Thompson 1. These fights were more lucrative and classier than, say, Hall v Small or Mitchell v Johanesson (even though I love this latter fight).

I'd call Arthur-Foster Jr a glorified domestic fight without hesistation, but not the Eubank-Benn-Watson fights.

I'd never call Benn just a domestic fighter, as he won his 2 titles away from home, beat the likes of DeWitt, McClellan and Barkley, improved to a draw in Eubank rematch. When Toney took 10 rounds to beat Barkley (9 rds longer than Benn), it made Toney a top 2 "pound for pounder."


Eubank should have been light heavy by the time of the Collins fights. Didn't have the temperament or stamina. Due to funny attitude and bad habits of long time WBO champ, Collins survived and won. Collins had good not great career. OK he beats old Benn and Eubank, but same thing would have happened to him had the Calzaghe fight been made rather than the likes of Craig Cummins...Dem Oirish, dey tink dat Collins was great. But woiy was he defending his turtle vs Craig Cummings? Woi was his getting knocked down by Cummins?
benn was clearly a world class fighter.as were eubank,watson and collins.the arthur-foster bout just doesent compare.as time passes,people will appreciate how good our super middles were.im not saying they were all timers,but they were very,very good fighters
sure, they were all regarded as top 10 world class, and put on great fights at times. a lot of guys between middle and light heavy sat in titles and had few memorable fights, so eubank-benn 1, eubank-watson 2, eubank-thompson (both), are quite astonishing fights

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 10:33
by Old bones Ian
I remember when Collins was matched with Mike McCullum, i'd not seen Collins fight and thought he'd be brave but get stopped in a few rounds and not be heard of much again. Collins proved his toughness that night, he'd only had 16 fights when he fought McCullum who was taking part in his 37th fight and his 10th world title fight.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 11:35
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Terry D wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Benn v Eubank and Eubank v Watson were way above domestic fights.

Eubank didn't fight much international comp, but he was in some epic world class battles such as Benn 1, Watson 2, Thompson 1. These fights were more lucrative and classier than, say, Hall v Small or Mitchell v Johanesson (even though I love this latter fight).

I'd call Arthur-Foster Jr a glorified domestic fight without hesistation, but not the Eubank-Benn-Watson fights.

I'd never call Benn just a domestic fighter, as he won his 2 titles away from home, beat the likes of DeWitt, McClellan and Barkley, improved to a draw in Eubank rematch. When Toney took 10 rounds to beat Barkley (9 rds longer than Benn), it made Toney a top 2 "pound for pounder."


Eubank should have been light heavy by the time of the Collins fights. Didn't have the temperament or stamina. Due to funny attitude and bad habits of long time WBO champ, Collins survived and won. Collins had good not great career. OK he beats old Benn and Eubank, but same thing would have happened to him had the Calzaghe fight been made rather than the likes of Craig Cummins.
Toney broke Iran down, Benn blasted him down, hit him illegally, and The Blade was protesting when losing to the 3-knockdown rule, file it under Dokes-Weaver 1, or Spoon versus Smith 2 (I think it was the rematch, cannot be arsed checking). The performance of Toney in defeating Iran was better than anything Benn, Eubank, even Watson, ever produced in terms of pure boxing technique.

You say yourself that Eubank was in battles with the likes of Benn, Watson, and Thompson, who are/were, in my opinion, domestic fighters, Benn raised his game when thing were stacked in his favour, but the likes of Benn, Eubank, and Collins lived under the grace of the likes of Toney and Jones, who would have spanked the granny out of them had the Brits fancied their chances against top-class prime rump, but they didn't, they just stayed here and smashed one another, Benn aside, who took on some US scraps.

Eubank-Benn-Watson were glorified domestic scraps, witness the Ring centenary record book listing Benn-Eubank 1 as a solid domestic battle, solid, not great, that got the Brits over-excited, they have a point, the fight was good, I've seen far, far better, we got caught up in the event, and it colours our perception of the fight, Edouard-Gibbs is a better fight, in my opinion.

Eubank-Watson I was poor, a terrible anti-climax, and the second fight was all about Chris' flaws, then came the dramtic ending, and the near-sacred status that was then bestowed on Watson's career, including his defusing of Benn, solid enough, but look at McCallum-Watson, and then tell me Watson was world class, what, then, was McCallum? Milky way class?

Eubank can sit around and smile enigmatically when asked if he 'let' Collins and Thompson off the hook, in reality he need to keep winning, he needed that dough, so he would have hammered Steve into the ground, had he had the energy to do so, he didn't, so he couldn't.

Eubank, Benn, and Watson, they gave us great nights, but they were not great fighters, Toney, McCallum, and Jones are/were.

Down the line, when people sit to talk about recent British greats (by that I mean easily top ten in their division) they will talk Lennox Lewis. Joe Calzaghe's name will come up, but SMW boss is akin to being named King Sh*t of Turd Mountain, it is a shallow division, and his LHW exploits are hardly worth mentioning.
I sort of agree and disagree with you here Terry. I suppose it depends on your definition of World Class, Jones/Toney/McCallum/BHOPs aren't just world class they are 4 of the best MWs ever, same with Nunn up until him going down hill.

Eubank-Benn 1 probably wasn't a 'real' world title fight, it was the genuine best in Britain/Europe so in a way the WBO belt gave it a glorified British Title/Euro Title banner. At the time everyone in Britain considered both as World Champs, which made them sporting icons. Eubank/Benn/Watson aren't in their class but Eubank/Benn would have given them all good scraps minus Jones who dominates the lot. Benn proved he could beat a P4P top MW in beating GMAN, although perhaps McClellan's pre-existing brain injury may have helped him.

The Barkley fight was very impressive and a world class display, yes it was the 3 KD rule but surely Barkley was getting put away early there and look how Barkley had just performed against Duran. Lets also not forget Eubank proved himself the best in Europe not only beating Benn/Watson but also another 168lb titlist in Rochiaggani who in turn was probably jobbed against Darius Michauski (sp) and beat Nunn.

So Both were Top5 in the world in 1 of best Middleweight Eras we've seen and there have been plenty of worse Middleweight Champions in history, and you could argue the likes of Lamotta and Pavlik weren't World Class if you're goin to argue Benn/Eubank weren't. Ultimately neither were Linear/Ring Champs and ultimately they weren't as good as the great forementioned Yanks/Jamaican, but that doesn't mean they weren't world class, they just weren't Milky Way Class :lol:

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 11:39
by slapbangwhallop
Autobarn wrote:Benn v Eubank and Eubank v Watson were way above domestic fights.

Eubank didn't fight much international comp, but he was in some epic world class battles such as Benn 1, Watson 2, Thompson 1. These fights were more lucrative and classier than, say, Hall v Small or Mitchell v Johanesson (even though I love this latter fight).

I'd call Arthur-Foster Jr a glorified domestic fight without hesistation, but not the Eubank-Benn-Watson fights.

I'd never call Benn just a domestic fighter, as he won his 2 titles away from home, beat the likes of DeWitt, McClellan and Barkley, improved to a draw in Eubank rematch. When Toney took 10 rounds to beat Barkley (9 rds longer than Benn), it made Toney a top 2 "pound for pounder."


Eubank should have been light heavy by the time of the Collins fights. Didn't have the temperament or stamina. Due to funny attitude and bad habits of long time WBO champ, Collins survived and won. Collins had good not great career. OK he beats old Benn and Eubank, but same thing would have happened to him had the Calzaghe fight been made rather than the likes of Craig Cummins...Dem Oirish, dey tink dat Collins was great. But woiy was he defending his turtle vs Craig Cummings? Woi was his getting knocked down by Cummins?
I dont think that Collins was "great" - he was extremely limited. Yet he beat two of Britain's biggest names.

Why was that? is it because Collin actually was great and infact "super great" because he beat these two "superstar" - twice - both twice!? Is it because Benn and Eubank were faded, mere shadows of their former selves? Is it because he got lucky?

Nah, none of those, its because Benn and Eubank werent that good in the first place and Collins had a shovel bigger than both of them - big enough to dig deep and grind the result out - a crackin wee chin didnt do him any harm either!

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 11:46
by teddy007
"mere shadows of their former selves"

That's what I think.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 11:54
by J
Yup collins certainly got benn at the right time.

good fighter though steve. solid and brave.

Re: Eubank vs Collins

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 13:09
by Autobarn
sligobhoy67 wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Benn v Eubank and Eubank v Watson were way above domestic fights.

Eubank didn't fight much international comp, but he was in some epic world class battles such as Benn 1, Watson 2, Thompson 1. These fights were more lucrative and classier than, say, Hall v Small or Mitchell v Johanesson (even though I love this latter fight).

I'd call Arthur-Foster Jr a glorified domestic fight without hesistation, but not the Eubank-Benn-Watson fights.

I'd never call Benn just a domestic fighter, as he won his 2 titles away from home, beat the likes of DeWitt, McClellan and Barkley, improved to a draw in Eubank rematch. When Toney took 10 rounds to beat Barkley (9 rds longer than Benn), it made Toney a top 2 "pound for pounder."


Eubank should have been light heavy by the time of the Collins fights. Didn't have the temperament or stamina. Due to funny attitude and bad habits of long time WBO champ, Collins survived and won. Collins had good not great career. OK he beats old Benn and Eubank, but same thing would have happened to him had the Calzaghe fight been made rather than the likes of Craig Cummins...Dem Oirish, dey tink dat Collins was great. But woiy was he defending his turtle vs Craig Cummings? Woi was his getting knocked down by Cummins?
I dont think that Collins was "great" - he was extremely limited. Yet he beat two of Britain's biggest names.

Why was that? is it because Collin actually was great and infact "super great" because he beat these two "superstar" - twice - both twice!? Is it because Benn and Eubank were faded, mere shadows of their former selves? Is it because he got lucky?

Nah, none of those, its because Benn and Eubank werent that good in the first place and Collins had a shovel bigger than both of them - big enough to dig deep and grind the result out - a crackin wee chin didnt do him any harm either!
they were all very good world class fighters. eubank has KOs of benn and watson but was horirble inconsistent. benn lost to best of britain but beat top international foes, including a sensational win over mclellan. collins was also very good, but perhaps had to take hard fights when everything wasn't in his favour (kalambay, reggie johnson) but then things evened out when he got eubank and benn at the right time. collins had a good run, and we can only agonise over "what if" regarding a calzaghe fight. who knows how differently both me's careers would have panned out? i just can't help but think that as good a run as collins had, he lacked a signature win.

i think we should value the benn-eubank-watson round robin. these were far better fights than the yanks put on.