Re: top prospects
Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 05:39
Nathan Cleverly, Kell Brook, Stephen Smith and Billy Joe Saunders.
I like Scott Quigg too.
I like Scott Quigg too.
Frank Will be signing Quigg soon then? When I trained down the collyhurst for a brief time he was jsut starting out with Reece Roberts and he had come from a kick-boxing background I think, he looked very young but he had something about him and is improving all the time.boxingchat wrote:Nathan Cleverly, Kell Brook, Stephen Smith and Billy Joe Saunders.
I like Scott Quigg too.
boxingchat wrote:Nathan Cleverly, Kell Brook, Stephen Smith and Billy Joe Saunders.
I like Scott Quigg too.
I would say in some fights he has looked better than Brook. In the McIntosh fight he showed he can fight, as well as box someone's ears off. The Oakey win on paper was a belter, but us boxing fans know that Oakey took the fight at about 90 seconds notice, so that win is slightly flawed. Brook looked sensational against McIntyre though, but is McIntyre really that good? I'm not so sure. Lomax did well winning PrizeFighter but it's obvious he's not really British class - the same goes for Billy Boyle, as well as Mr. Jones.lefthook82 wrote:Nathan Cleverly is solid but I dont know if he is a top prospect. Time will tell. Maybe in 5-10 fights time.
To be fair Oakey was training for a fight against a relatively similar in style and size opponent (though not of the same level). Cleverley was training for Dean Francis who is of course a similar level opponent as Oakey but a very different style.The Oakey win on paper was a belter, but us boxing fans know that Oakey took the fight at about 90 seconds notice, so that win is slightly flawed
And most importantly if they rematched now can anyone on the forum envisage anything but a comprehensive win for Cleverley, probably by stoppage? I certainly can't.CJB wrote:To be fair Oakey was training for a fight against a relatively similar in style and size opponent (though not of the same level). Cleverley was training for Dean Francis who is of course a similar level opponent as Oakey but a very different style.The Oakey win on paper was a belter, but us boxing fans know that Oakey took the fight at about 90 seconds notice, so that win is slightly flawed
You could argue either way as to who had a more difficult job adjusting their plans, but I don't think you should discredit what was a very good win and fight based on the late notice of opponent change.
He was quite fat that night though - he prepared for a knockover job, not Nathan Cleverly.CJB wrote:To be fair Oakey was training for a fight against a relatively similar in style and size opponent (though not of the same level). Cleverley was training for Dean Francis who is of course a similar level opponent as Oakey but a very different style.The Oakey win on paper was a belter, but us boxing fans know that Oakey took the fight at about 90 seconds notice, so that win is slightly flawed