Page 1 of 1
One fight only..
Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 16:52
by Rocky Balboa
If you had to choose just ONE fight to come true, who would it be & why?
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 17:02
by BARNEYKX
ROCKY MARCIANO V MOHAMMED ALI
Ali probably box the head of Rocky and cut him up bad while taunting him
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 17:07
by alexpaterson
B.Leonard vs R.Duran the 2 best LW ever very intresting fight would be intresting to see it
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 17:21
by raylawpc
Jack Johnson v. Jim Jeffries, March 28, 1905, with Eddie Graney as referee. I've always believed that Jeff would have defeated Johnson if they had fought in Jeff's prime. I'd like to know if I was right.
A few Runner's up that came to mind:
Jack Johnson v. Sam Langford - anytime after 1910.
Benny Leonard v. Mickey Walker for Walker's welterweight title. August or September, 1924 (a fight that was scheduled to happen but didn't due to a broken hand suffered by Leonard.)
Joe Louis v. Jimmy Bivins - the Japanese don't invade Pearl Harbor and Louis defends against Bivins in 1945 in the midst of Bivins win streak.
Sam Langford v. Stanley Ketchel - Walter Dipley misses and Ketchel defends the middleweight title against Langford in early 1911.
Tommy Ryan v. Joe Walcott - Ryan crosses the color line and defends his welterweight title against the dangerous Barbados Demon in 1897.
SSR v. Charley Burley - the up-and-coming Robinson fights Charley Burley in 1945 (catchweights).
But for the winds of fate, each of these fights could have happened.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 17:29
by yancey
Frazier-Marciano, prime for prime.
Frazier by tko in 10.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 18:27
by Goodnight, Irene
Foreman-Liston, but, boy, literally hundreds of bouts spring to mind. This should be turned into a, "One Dreamfight Per Division" idea.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 19:31
by HomicideHenry
Hard decision to make. I'll break it up into a few categories [weight classes/catchweight]:
Heavyweight:
Jack Dempsey vs Joe louis
or.....
Rocky Marciano vs Muhammad Ali
Cruiserweight:
Evander Holyfield vs David Haye
Light Heavyweight:
Gene Tunney vs Ezzard Charles
or.....
Archie Moore vs Michael Spinks
Middleweights:
Harry Greb vs Sugar Ray Robinson
Catchweight:
Roberto Duran vs Manny Pacquia @ 140
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 04:22
by Ezzard
There are plenty of fights that could/should have happened but didn’t…
Dempsey-Wills would probably have the most significant of them.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 14:02
by yiddle
duran vs whitaker
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 17:56
by bjermaine
i like raylawpc's fights because they could have all actually happened. in a fantasy matchup, i would pick roy jones vs ray robinson at 160 just to shut everyone up.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
or i might want to see a sam langford vs charley burley fight at 160 for the "greatest fighter never to win a title" title.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 18:35
by Collins2000
bjermaine wrote:i like raylawpc's fights because they could have all actually happened. in a fantasy matchup, i would pick roy jones vs ray robinson at 160 just to shut everyone up.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
or i might want to see a sam langford vs charley burley fight at 160 for the "greatest fighter never to win a title" title.
What footage of Langford exists?
Graham Houston just did a review of Moyle's recent book on The Boston Tar baby and it has piqued my interest.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 19:14
by bjermaine
Collins2000 wrote:bjermaine wrote:i like raylawpc's fights because they could have all actually happened. in a fantasy matchup, i would pick roy jones vs ray robinson at 160 just to shut everyone up.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
or i might want to see a sam langford vs charley burley fight at 160 for the "greatest fighter never to win a title" title.
What footage of Langford exists?
Graham Houston just did a review of Moyle's recent book on The Boston Tar baby and it has piqued my interest.
i believe the only footage is his 1911 fight against bill lang which langford won by dq in the 6th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRRYS9Rh7Bk
and his march 1910 fight with fireman jim flynn which langford wins by ko in the 8th.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU90MwTU7yc
the lang footage is good. i'm about half-way through moyle's book on langford. it's a good read.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 19:23
by Ric
How about per "traditional" division: fly, bantam, feather, light, welter, middle, LH, and heavy?
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 19:26
by Collins2000
bjermaine wrote:Collins2000 wrote:bjermaine wrote:i like raylawpc's fights because they could have all actually happened. in a fantasy matchup, i would pick roy jones vs ray robinson at 160 just to shut everyone up.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
or i might want to see a sam langford vs charley burley fight at 160 for the "greatest fighter never to win a title" title.
What footage of Langford exists?
Graham Houston just did a review of Moyle's recent book on The Boston Tar baby and it has piqued my interest.
i believe the only footage is his 1911 fight against bill lang which langford won by dq in the 6th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRRYS9Rh7Bk
and his march 1910 fight with fireman jim flynn which langford wins by ko in the 8th.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU90MwTU7yc
the lang footage is good. i'm about half-way through moyle's book on langford. it's a good read.
Thanks! I will have a look at those bouts tonight.
Houston's review of the book:
http://www.fightwriter.com/?q=node/2319
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 19:40
by bjermaine
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 19:57
by danieljenkins
aaron pryor vs duran try to beat that !
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 30 Jul 2009, 23:39
by My2Sense
HomicideHenry wrote:
Middleweights:
Harry Greb vs Sugar Ray Robinson
First one that came to my mind.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 31 Jul 2009, 09:54
by Ezzard
Sanchez - Pedroza
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 31 Jul 2009, 10:06
by elmersalsa
Carlos Monzon vs Marvin Hagler
Roberto Duran vs Henry Armstrong
Wilfredo Gomez vs Marco Antonio Barrera
Eder Jofre vs Carlos Zarate
Matthew Saad Muhammad vs Bob Foster
Danny Lopez vs Manny Pacquiao
Mike Tyson vs George Foreman
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 31 Jul 2009, 10:07
by elmersalsa
Ezzard wrote:There are plenty of fights that could/should have happened but didn’t…
Dempsey-Wills would probably have the most significant of them.
Your picks were excellent Ezzard. You also pick Sanchez vs Pedroza...Oh man, great picks

Re: One fight only..
Posted: 31 Jul 2009, 10:09
by Ezzard
elmersalsa wrote:Ezzard wrote:There are plenty of fights that could/should have happened but didn’t…
Dempsey-Wills would probably have the most significant of them.
Your picks were excellent Ezzard. You also pick Sanchez vs Pedroza...Oh man, great picks

Here's another one I know you'll like Hearns-McCallum at 154.
Re: One fight only..
Posted: 31 Jul 2009, 11:17
by giacomino
Way too many to pick just one. Here are a few:
Pascual Perez v Jimmy Wilde
Jung-Koo Chang v Myung-Woo Yuh
Ruben Olivares v Khaosi Galaxy (bantamweight)
Sandy Saddler v Terry McGovern
Duran v Pryor, Chavez, Pernell Whitaker or Manny P
Monzon v Hagler
W. Benitez v N. Locche
Whitaker v S.R. Leonard, welterweight