O'Donnell v Glover
Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 05:02
Just heard this is going ahead without the title been at stake, anyone know the reason for this.
They were my thoughts. surely this cant be the reason though can itHorse wrote:Glover has been beating decent opposition recently. I think it would be unfair if he was not considered to be a good enough opponent to challenge for the belt by the board.
This is the main event of a bill to be televised on ITV4. Without this fight being for the Commonwealth title then it is a very poor main event, so I can't think of any other reason that this would not be for the Commonwealth belt.rf wrote:They were my thoughts. surely this cant be the reason though can it
huh, how does the title not being at stake make it any less of a main event?Horse wrote:This is the main event of a bill to be televised on ITV4. Without this fight being for the Commonwealth title then it is a very poor main event, so I can't think of any other reason that this would not be for the Commonwealth belt.rf wrote:They were my thoughts. surely this cant be the reason though can it
What are the viewers going to think? Having a title on the line makes people more interested.Lenny wrote:huh, how does the title not being at stake make it any less of a main event?
It doesnt make it any less of a fight but wondered why Glover has not got the chance to fight for this title.Lenny wrote:huh, how does the title not being at stake make it any less of a main event?Horse wrote:This is the main event of a bill to be televised on ITV4. Without this fight being for the Commonwealth title then it is a very poor main event, so I can't think of any other reason that this would not be for the Commonwealth belt.rf wrote:They were my thoughts. surely this cant be the reason though can it
probablyDavidPayne wrote:No but O'Donnell's weight was read out as 147 3/4 if I'm not mistaken, don't know if the two things were related.
I don't think it had anything to do with him being overweight since we knew the title wasn't on the line days before the weigh inAdamj1987 wrote:probablyDavidPayne wrote:No but O'Donnell's weight was read out as 147 3/4 if I'm not mistaken, don't know if the two things were related.