Page 1 of 1

O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 05:02
by rf
Just heard this is going ahead without the title been at stake, anyone know the reason for this.

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 05:08
by Horse
Glover has been beating decent opposition recently. I think it would be unfair if he was not considered to be a good enough opponent to challenge for the belt by the board.

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 05:10
by rf
Horse wrote:Glover has been beating decent opposition recently. I think it would be unfair if he was not considered to be a good enough opponent to challenge for the belt by the board.
They were my thoughts. surely this cant be the reason though can it

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 05:26
by Horse
rf wrote:They were my thoughts. surely this cant be the reason though can it
This is the main event of a bill to be televised on ITV4. Without this fight being for the Commonwealth title then it is a very poor main event, so I can't think of any other reason that this would not be for the Commonwealth belt.

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 07:22
by Lenny
Horse wrote:
rf wrote:They were my thoughts. surely this cant be the reason though can it
This is the main event of a bill to be televised on ITV4. Without this fight being for the Commonwealth title then it is a very poor main event, so I can't think of any other reason that this would not be for the Commonwealth belt.
huh, how does the title not being at stake make it any less of a main event?

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 07:54
by Horse
Lenny wrote:huh, how does the title not being at stake make it any less of a main event?
What are the viewers going to think? Having a title on the line makes people more interested.

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 07:58
by 15829
not really althogh o'donnel is a champion he still needs a few learning fights which this is

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 08:02
by rf
Lenny wrote:
Horse wrote:
rf wrote:They were my thoughts. surely this cant be the reason though can it
This is the main event of a bill to be televised on ITV4. Without this fight being for the Commonwealth title then it is a very poor main event, so I can't think of any other reason that this would not be for the Commonwealth belt.
huh, how does the title not being at stake make it any less of a main event?
It doesnt make it any less of a fight but wondered why Glover has not got the chance to fight for this title.

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 08:04
by saturday_kid
Yeah but a learning fight is pretty poor for a televised main event. The bill was poor anyway for TV, now without it being for the Commonwealth scrap its even worse.

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 02 Sep 2009, 08:41
by Adamj1987
at least glover will deffo be fighting for english title in october but its pretty shit the title isnt on the line

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 08 Sep 2009, 04:21
by jonny
Did ITV mention why the title was not on the line ?

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 08 Sep 2009, 05:28
by DavidPayne
No but O'Donnell's weight was read out as 147 3/4 if I'm not mistaken, don't know if the two things were related.

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 08 Sep 2009, 08:46
by Adamj1987
DavidPayne wrote:No but O'Donnell's weight was read out as 147 3/4 if I'm not mistaken, don't know if the two things were related.
probably

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 08 Sep 2009, 09:32
by WestEndRiot
Adamj1987 wrote:
DavidPayne wrote:No but O'Donnell's weight was read out as 147 3/4 if I'm not mistaken, don't know if the two things were related.
probably
I don't think it had anything to do with him being overweight since we knew the title wasn't on the line days before the weigh in

Re: O'Donnell v Glover

Posted: 08 Sep 2009, 11:48
by alexpaterson
I was impressed with O'Donnell he looked very fast his combinations were classy he kept him at range and boxed well

I want to see a rematch with Watson