Page 1 of 1
McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 16:56
by whicker
... in their rematch.
Remarkable odds, given that most people felt he clearly won the first one.
With all the hoo-har-shhee-boo-harr surrounding the given result of the first one, Fury I think would need to win this clearly in order to get his hand raised. Maybe.
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 17:01
by opticald
DEFINITLY a value play
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 17:26
by Rixxy
i think tyson will basically need to ko mcdermott in the re-match becuase everyone will remember the first fight between them.
In my eyes tyson will win but it will be another close contest. What are the odds for a tyson win?
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 17:34
by whicker
Rixxy wrote:i think tyson will basically need to ko mcdermott in the re-match becuase everyone will remember the first fight between them.
In my eyes tyson will win but it will be another close contest. What are the odds for a tyson win?
Well, 1/2 if you can get it, or 4/9.
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 17:57
by Gazmac81
i think Fury will get it clearer this time
Mcdermott should have had his night of glory and it was taken away from him
What more can he do than that performance
Well we know what more he can do but will he be able to KO Fury

Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 18:02
by whicker
Gazmac81 wrote:i think Fury will get it clearer this time
Why, though? How will he improve between now and December?
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 20:33
by BroughtonRulesRefuge
whicker wrote:... in their rematch.
Remarkable odds, given that most people felt he clearly won the first one.
With all the hoo-har-shhee-boo-harr surrounding the given result of the first one, Fury I think would need to win this clearly in order to get his hand raised. Maybe.
- Ah, hah, hardy har, har.............Fury clan to be richer than the Queen herself after this bout.
Bet the farms lads, Fury knocked McD mouthpiece out twice and had him fleeing for his life into the ropes and the gentle arms of the everluvvin' ref who has been savaged for saving McD's ample bacon from being deep fried.
Fury knows it, and more importantly McD knows he fled for his life, and won't be able to hide this time. Just pray the collective force of slack jaws hitting the floor when it happens doesn't set off an earthquake to spoil the festivities!
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 21:48
by whicker
Thats an interesting angle... perhaps we have all got so caught up in the "McDermott was robbed" psyche that people are forgetting that Tyson looked the better man in that fight?
Still, that doesn't sound quite right to me.
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 01 Oct 2009, 03:20
by mickey1975
going on last saturdays performance,fury's power isnt going to improve.
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 01 Oct 2009, 03:53
by black panther
Fury needs a trainer who will be strict with him and take no BS. I get the impression all these people around him telling him he is big puncher etc. has gone to his head somewhat. The fact of the matter is his conditioning is not what it should be, he throws "arm-punches" and lacks snap. That said he's still only a baby and has potential. I don't think people should right him off just yet - he's still somewhat a novice. I believe the McDermott experience will have done him the world of good. With the right trainer and right attitude he could improve dramatically - he just needs to stop believing in his own hype a bit. I'll take Tyson in the rematch - by stoppage. McDermott's best chance was last time out - hopefully Fury will only get better from here on in.
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 01 Oct 2009, 04:47
by Gazmac81
My reason is that i think he will now realize what he needs to do to win and will come up with the right tactics to do this , maybe he underestimated John in the first one.
i cant see Mcdermott producing another performance like that
I hope Mcdermott gets right in about him again though and gets the victory.
i just feel he has had his best chance of that stolen though.
should still be a good fight and the build up should be good
whicker wrote:Gazmac81 wrote:i think Fury will get it clearer this time
Why, though? How will he improve between now and December?
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 01 Oct 2009, 04:50
by Gazmac81
Fled For his Life , talk about Exaggerating
Maybe if Fury stops fixing his hair inbetween getting punched then he would have done much more to convince the majority that he was the better man,
although seems the Ref sees it different.
BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:whicker wrote:... in their rematch.
Remarkable odds, given that most people felt he clearly won the first one.
With all the hoo-har-shhee-boo-harr surrounding the given result of the first one, Fury I think would need to win this clearly in order to get his hand raised. Maybe.
- Ah, hah, hardy har, har.............Fury clan to be richer than the Queen herself after this bout.
Bet the farms lads, Fury knocked McD mouthpiece out twice and had him fleeing for his life into the ropes and the gentle arms of the everluvvin' ref who has been savaged for saving McD's ample bacon from being deep fried.
Fury knows it, and more importantly McD knows he fled for his life, and won't be able to hide this time. Just pray the collective force of slack jaws hitting the floor when it happens doesn't set off an earthquake to spoil the festivities!
Re: McDermott 2-1 to beat Fury
Posted: 01 Oct 2009, 11:09
by whicker
Is it psychological? Had McDermott been given the verdict, become English champion, and been rematched with Fury, would people still say Fury was the 1/2 favourite?