Page 1 of 2
#2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 18:54
by granberry
HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
where a fighter was declared the winner by 'knockout'
where the fighter who scored the knock down never went to a neutral corner
AND where the 'referee' never counted over the fighter who was down
AND where the 'referee' stopped the fight on instructions given to him by a non-official sitting at ringside.
?
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 22:19
by Collins2000
Post some pictures of lads with big bulging biceps and six packs.
You'll feel better then.

Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 30 Sep 2009, 23:00
by Dempsey1238
granberry wrote:HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
where a fighter was declared the winner by 'knockout'
where the fighter who scored the knock down never went to a neutral corner
AND where the 'referee' never counted over the fighter who was down
AND where the 'referee' stopped the fight on instructions given to him by a non-official sitting at ringside.
?
All in 1 fight??
I know I know which fight your talking about lol.
Can I say Dempsey Willard in the neutral rule thing.
2 MMMM, Louis Maricano, the 2nd knockdown?? Not sure were I go for here.
3, Just 1 that I know of.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 02 Oct 2009, 01:00
by granberry
Dempsey1238 wrote:granberry wrote:HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
where a fighter was declared the winner by 'knockout'
where the fighter who scored the knock down never went to a neutral corner
AND where the 'referee' never counted over the fighter who was down
AND where the 'referee' stopped the fight on instructions given to him by a non-official sitting at ringside.
?
All in 1 fight??
I know I know which fight your talking about lol.
What 'fight' may that be?
LOL
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 02 Oct 2009, 16:58
by granberry
Still waiting for answers from boxrec's crew of boxing 'experts.'
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 02 Oct 2009, 17:10
by Collins2000
granberry wrote:Still waiting for answers from boxrec's crew of boxing 'experts.'
While you are waiting, pull up your piss-stained Y-fronts, crack open another can of lager and post some more pictures of muscular young lads like Buff who you have 'known' over the years.

Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 02 Oct 2009, 22:17
by granberry
Not getting any answers.
Only filth from boxrec's sicko, collins, who is the nephew of one of boxrec's owners who lets him trash the site.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 02 Oct 2009, 23:37
by Collins2000
granberry wrote:Not getting any answers.
gran, do you think they might be ignoring you?
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 02 Oct 2009, 23:40
by Robinson
Tell me who please, who...
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 00:32
by Collins2000
Robinson wrote:Tell me who please, who...
What's the next fight to score?
I got Holmes vs Witherspoon or Dokes vs Weaver (2) here...
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 01:34
by Robinson
Holmes vs Witherspoon ?
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 01:38
by Collins2000
Robinson wrote:Holmes vs Witherspoon ?
Two of my favourites.
Righto.
Must be awful to hate like some of these sick fuks do.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 01:45
by Robinson
Agreed.
I enjoy both men.
Just rewatched both guys fight Mercer earlier this week.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 01:52
by Collins2000
Robinson wrote:Agreed.
I enjoy both men.
Just rewatched both guys fight Mercer earlier this week.
Larry gave him Mercer a boxing lesson as I recall.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 01:55
by Robinson
Worked behind the jab most the night, countered from the ropes well
and frustrated Mercer for most the night.
Witherspoon vs Mercer was a great toe to toe body busting, jaw cracking
bang fest. It needed atleast another two rounds on it.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 02:14
by Collins2000
Almost forgot.
I just downloaded a mint full version of Ali vs Cooper(1).
Let's do that first if you have a full copy. (It should be 40 minutes long including the 20 minute break that OJ thinks happened).
Gran and his lap dog BRR had some ridiculous comments on that fight. Perhaps they will join in scoring with us; probably not as gran has already been told what happened by Uncle Bert.
Then straight onto Holmes vs Witherspoon. Great fighters, great fight. Unless you are a limp-cocked, weak-kneed fag who slurps shite (oooooooooooooooooooooooh, nasty!!!) while jizzing over pictures of Buff and Kid Azteca.

Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 06:33
by Robinson
Where did you DL it from Collins ?
Ill see if I have a full copy of that fight.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 07:50
by Martin Sosa Cameron
When a boy is the K.O. winner?
I don't knows when I remember, for example, Dempsey vs Firpo or second Tunney vs Dempsey...
When? When?
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 14:46
by Brutu
Jack Johnson vrs Tommy Burns
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 14:47
by Brutu
Ali vrs Liston II
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 16:10
by Collins2000
Robinson wrote:Where did you DL it from Collins ?
Ill see if I have a full copy of that fight.
www.thebox.bz
PM me your email address if you need an invite to join
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 17:07
by BoxBuzz
cripes what's the point of this?
I think we discovered via the first Liston Clay fight that the Ali Liston fight mystique is ALL about Liston's lack of belief in himself. Could he have done better? Probably, but he was shell shocked and suffered from that post traumatic stress syndrome thing that's so popular these days. He thought he could "scowl" his way to another victory first time around and coudn't pull it off. And UNLIKE Floyd who gained character from his losses, Liston just "broke and stayed broke" pretty much. At least in the face of Ali.
No matter what skills Liston possessed and they were formidable indeed, he could not summon them in the face of this opponent. granberry for all your self claimed understanding of the physical dynamics of boxing you know nothing about the human psyche and how that often can trump everything else. Not that Liston ever possessed the skills to dominate Ali, he probably did have the skills to beat him or give him a great fight if all things went well, and if his mental state was never an issue.
All the incompetence and drama that played out in that second fight is simply that. It is not credible to attempt to parlay these facts into a "conspiratorial scandal" that folks like granberry like to spin it into. Just a small crowd, big personalities and the "fog of excitement". Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar....and sometimes a fight with unusual aspects is simply a fight with unusual aspects. This was an internal meltdown on Liston's behalf in the face of the voluminously charismatic and effectively talented and skilled Ali.
The "fix" and "conspiracy" were contained within the cerebrum of ONE MAN.....Charles Sonny Liston. Which by definition means that it was NOT truly a conspiracy because that would mean it would have scripted...which it most certainly was not. (Please read up on "chaos". that fight should be the very definition of that word)
On the other hand Paul McCartney was the first Beatle to actually die....now that's a conspiracy with legs. I believe his body will be found in the grassy knoll somewhere in Dallas.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 19:18
by fatcity69
Oh, and there was me thinking that Ali was just too fast and too strong for him.
Wheres Cranberry when I need him.
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 29 Oct 2009, 16:13
by granberry
Still waiting for an answer.
LOL
Re: #2---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....?
Posted: 06 Dec 2009, 02:27
by granberry
Buzz will now tell us what an excellent referee Walcott was.
Go to it, buzz.