Page 1 of 1
No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 02:01
by bollox
hehe. Is that because the cup is in MELBOURNE? All interstaters bow
to our sporting supremacy. There's even talk of a GF at the MCG
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 02:04
by toppity
bollox wrote:hehe. Is that because the cup is in MELBOURNE? All interstaters bow
to our sporting supremacy. There's even talk of a GF at the MCG
it could be a curtain raiser to the footy grand final.
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 02:06
by bollox
toppity wrote:bollox wrote:hehe. Is that because the cup is in MELBOURNE? All interstaters bow
to our sporting supremacy. There's even talk of a GF at the MCG
it could be a curtain raiser to the footy grand final.
You trying to cause trouble?
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 02:28
by toppity
bollox wrote:toppity wrote:bollox wrote:hehe. Is that because the cup is in MELBOURNE? All interstaters bow
to our sporting supremacy. There's even talk of a GF at the MCG
it could be a curtain raiser to the footy grand final.
You trying to cause trouble?
i do have a habit
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 03:28
by Brute
bollox wrote:hehe. Is that because the cup is in MELBOURNE? All interstaters bow
to our sporting supremacy. There's even talk of a GF at the MCG
Rugby Grand Final? University beat Randwick?
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 07:26
by perfect jet
As a spectacle, it was well short of the previous week Bulldogs v Parra match.
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 07:40
by toppity
perfect jet wrote:As a spectacle, it was well short of the previous week Bulldogs v Parra match.
as a result though, it couldn't have been better.
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 17:29
by Marlin
Brute wrote:bollox wrote:hehe. Is that because the cup is in MELBOURNE? All interstaters bow
to our sporting supremacy. There's even talk of a GF at the MCG
Rugby Grand Final? University beat Randwick?
That is exactly what I was going to say
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 23:08
by bollox
How's Carmichael Hunt gonna go in the AFL? My guess is, he won't make it and will go back to what he's good at. It'd be like an AFL player going over to try and play rugby at the top level. It just wouldn't happen
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 06 Oct 2009, 23:50
by Marlin
K is going over for the sole reason of marketing/promoting the game on the Gold Coast. Some say he has already earned his contract money with the publicity he has generated thus far...
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 08 Oct 2009, 09:32
by Hounddawg
K thought it would be a good idea to try out some of his AFL kicking while still playing League, obviously didn't come off and Henjak pulled him aside and said to him" Mate your a hole runner, so run... don't kick everytime you touch the ball.....
All the best to K,a Milion dollars a season, who would of thought K was worth that. I suppose his stocks would have went down after he couldn't wrestle the number 1 spot of Slater for both QLD and Australia. Mundine made more money in another sport after he played second to Fittler for his career....who knows could be a future Brownlow
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 08 Oct 2009, 18:32
by toppity
No
Re: No discussion re the rugby GF?
Posted: 09 Oct 2009, 23:16
by Brute
The way things are going Melbourne may have problems. News Limited owns The Storm and are trying to cut back on their involvement in NRL. Someone had come up with a daft idea of having a group of eight led by former PM Curly Howard running the game. After a political career of over 30 years Howard has no idea what "impartiality" is.