Page 1 of 1
Brodie v Crolla on... or is it?
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 09:56
by dbflex
http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/BN08/detail.asp?id=1300
Terry Dooley speaks to both trainers, plus 'Million Dollar' himself about a Manchester derby pitting recent past against possible future. All feedback appreciated.
Re: Brodie v Crolla on... or is it?
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:22
by teddy007
Cheers dude, nice interview and thenks for clearing that up.
Re: Brodie v Crolla on... or is it?
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:23
by thepocketrocket
Great interview, as always!
Why exactly did Crolla leave Arnie???
Re: Brodie v Crolla on... or is it?
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:29
by DavidPayne
"Don't blame it on sunshine, don't blame it on moonlight, blame it on the trainer"
Re: Brodie v Crolla on... or is it?
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:32
by teddy007
thepocketrocket wrote:Great interview, as always!
Why exactly did Crolla leave Arnie???
Because Arnie is contracted to train Warren fighters only I believe which could be argued is why he has a strong stable in the North West. He needs to make a sucess of some of his fighters and needs to win some 50/50 fights which he didn't do with Crolla, i'm not slagging Arnie that is just the facts at the moment.
Re: Brodie v Crolla on... or is it?
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:38
by teddy007
Terry D wrote:Tedd answers in his own unique style. To be fair Crolla was a solid jab and movement away from beating Sykes in my opinion. The jab would have kept Gary off balance allowing Crolla to land some better shots and possibly carry the decision.
Crolla's move to Joe G was amicable and it all worked out nicely. This will be a stiff test of his nerve though.
Once the date is set we'll let you know. I've also assured Joe Gallagher that we will contact him when we know the final details of the fight, just to keep him in the loop.
Totaly aggree Terry he could of beaten Sykes but thats what I mean when Arnie needs to start winning 50/50 fights from a tacticts point of view