Page 1 of 3
graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 09:56
by 15829
its on david coldwells facebook should be a decent fight if earl loses this surley he will retire hes an accident waiting to happen. think woodhouse by corner retirement
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:00
by Adamj1987
ill go for woodhouse
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:03
by rhino222
earl is in danger of getting hurt, he would have beaten woodhouse with ease 5 years ago, but now, graham is a spent shot force, a nice lad, and he needs those close to him and who love him to tell him to call it a day.
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:06
by forcefraser
rhino222 wrote:earl is in danger of getting hurt, he would have beaten woodhouse with ease 5 years ago, but now, graham is a spent shot force, a nice lad, and he needs those close to him and who love him to tell him to call it a day.
Agreed. Since the Katsidis beating, Earl has looked on shaky legs every time he has fought.
Good servant to the game, but should really call it a day. That being said, who are we to tell a guy who probably loves the sport and needs the pay packets, that he should hang up the gloves?
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:10
by whicker
Should be a good fight, yeah. What show is it on?
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:13
by 15829
its at the Gemtec Arena,KC Stadium HULL think coldwells promoting its 8x3 at light welterweight
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:30
by alexpaterson
I havent been impressed with Woodhouse he has a good story so e might sell seats but as yet im not convinced by his talent Earl KO imo
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:31
by Adamj1987
earl has no punch resistance left
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:32
by 15829
if earls got anything left the he would easily win but in his last few fights hes looked like a shot fighter
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:32
by Adamj1987
diggler wrote:if earls got anything left the he would easily win but in his last few fights hes looked like a shot fighter
he has indeed
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:44
by rf
Should have retired after the Khan fight. Shame
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:46
by The Law
alexpaterson wrote:I havent been impressed with Woodhouse he has a good story so e might sell seats but as yet im not convinced by his talent
x 2
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:56
by whicker
diggler wrote:if earls got anything left the he would easily win but in his last few fights hes looked like a shot fighter
Which fights? Wasn't easy to tell with Khan, it was over so quickly.
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:57
by Adamj1987
whicker wrote:diggler wrote:if earls got anything left the he would easily win but in his last few fights hes looked like a shot fighter
Which fights?
khan for 1
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 10:58
by whicker
Adamj1987 wrote:whicker wrote:diggler wrote:if earls got anything left the he would easily win but in his last few fights hes looked like a shot fighter
Which fights?
khan for 1
Yeah, he's had 2 first round stoppages (ouch) - but that CAN happen.
This fight will tell us more.
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 11:00
by rhino222
Adamj1987 wrote:whicker wrote:diggler wrote:if earls got anything left the he would easily win but in his last few fights hes looked like a shot fighter
Which fights?
khan for 1
Castle for 2
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 11:00
by 15829
hes had a lot of hard fights even when hes won hes been in a war and katsidis took the last bit of fight earl had
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 11:01
by Adamj1987
he comfortably beat karl taylor but that showed us nothing he was expected to beat taylor easy
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 11:35
by Captain Hook
Three years ago this would have been all Earl but I'm sad to say he's had it. TKO for Woodhouse.
Shame, but can't see it going any other way.
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 12:57
by Coco
What weight is it made at?
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 13:40
by Tommy Gunn13
is this a joke thread????
yes Earl is shot to pieces&woodhouse is a novice at best...
how can the bbbc sanction this fight???
earl ex title challanger vs a novice..... WTF!!!
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 13:59
by Spud
Dave,
Has the fight definitely been made?
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 14:39
by 15829
Coco wrote:What weight is it made at?
lightwelter weight
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 15:37
by Coco
diggler wrote:Coco wrote:What weight is it made at?
lightwelter weight
If they make it 10 stone exactly Woodhouse will surely be tight at the weight
Re: graham earl v curtis woodhouse
Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 15:55
by whicker
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:is this a joke thread????
yes Earl is shot to pieces&woodhouse is a novice at best...
how can the bbbc sanction this fight???
earl ex title challanger vs a novice..... WTF!!!
It seems pretty balanced- why not?